Jump to content

wripro

Members
  • Posts

    15,290
  • Joined

Posts posted by wripro

  1. If you are comparing crossing on QM2 with a luxury liner there are several things to remember.. The QM2 crosses the North Atlantic which is much rougher then the South Atlantic which the cruise ships use. I have crossed several times on Silversea and Seabourn and it was always very smooth. These are repositioning cruises to get their ships from Europe to the Caribbean or vice versa. However, if you want a true crossing experience then the QM2 is the way to go. It's six or seven days nonstop the way it was in the old days. As long as you're aware of the caveats I mentioned in my earlier post you'll be ok. Remember that despite peoples' claims that Cunard's ships have a class system that is only true about where you dine. The rest of the ship is one class and that is why you won't have the same experience as on a luxury line. Still, I'd say go for it at least once.

  2. If you are considering a crossing on QM2 I think you would be all right. However, not on a cruise where you have to disembark and embark at ports every day and you are competing with thousands of other people for space. Just be prepared not ti have the same sort of intimate experience. That said, I repeat that the food and service in QG were excellent.

  3. I have sailed Seabourn and Silversea extensively and also done Queen's Grill on the QE2 and QM2. IMO the food and service in QG compares to the luxury lines, it is really excellent. BUT, and this is a big BUT, the minute you leave the QG and its lounge you are in the midst of a mass market ship with 2600 other passengers and the atmosphere and service there do not even come close to the Seabourn or Silversea.

  4. To me "privileged passage" is a sign of "floundering bottom line." If SS were filling all its ships with the current dress code they would never experiment with country club casual. But in an effort to reach a new market who do not like to dress up they are willing to sacrifice what has made them so special in the first place. They would never give up the $400 per couple they charge for early embarkation and late disembarkation. I know it's only one cruise. For now!!!! But if they sell that one out you can bet it will be followed by many more. Now, this is not the end of the world....just the end of SS as we know it.

  5. uk1,

     

    When I said it didn't cost me an extra dime I meant that I didn't have to pay $200 for early embarkation as I would have on Silversea in order to enjoy a nice leisurely lunch in the dining room. According to your logic those who do not elect early embarkation on Silversea are paying for something they will not receive as they cannot even board until 3PM.

  6. Years ago, starting in 1994 when I first sailed Silversea, there was never a problem embarking at noon. If the suites weren't ready we were allowed to sit in the Panorama Lounge and have tea or a drink until we could get in. I'm not sure when this strict embarkation at 3PM started and they began charging for early embarkation, but it goes against the feeling of being a guest rather than a paying passenger.

     

    On my last Seabourn cruise we embarked at 11:45 and our suites were not ready so we were invited to go to the dining room for lunch with the in transit passengers. By the time we finished the embarkation process had begun. And it didn't cost me an extra dime.

×
×
  • Create New...

If you are already a Cruise Critic member, please log in with your existing account information or your email address and password.