Jump to content

Southampton Mayflower Terminal


thecatcher

Recommended Posts

Recently embarked the Queen Victoria this time by Mayflower terminal for the first time. What a dump. It took 1 1/2 hours from joining the check-in queue to boarding. Unlike Ocean terminal there is no seating. Is this shambles reserved for Cunard passengers or is it normal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shambolic check-in is down to the cruise line or their shore agents.

We've always had very smooth embarkation/disembarkation at Mayflower on P&O cruises.

 

And Cunard passengers generally give good reports on embarkations. But they very rarely use Mayflower, they normally use QE11 terminal (Southampton's struffy & most archaic terminal) or Ocean terminal.

 

Mebbe a late change of terminal caught their staff out?

Or just a bad day at the office.

 

JB :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shambolic check-in is down to the cruise line or their shore agents.

We've always had very smooth embarkation/disembarkation at Mayflower on P&O cruises.

 

And Cunard passengers generally give good reports on embarkations. But they very rarely use Mayflower, they normally use QE11 terminal (Southampton's struffy & most archaic terminal) or Ocean terminal.

 

Mebbe a late change of terminal caught their staff out?

Or just a bad day at the office.

 

JB :)

 

Cunard mostly use the Ocean terminal and only seem to use the QE2 terminal when there's a big ship (such as Azura) in Ocean.

 

We've always had Ocean terminal with Cunard apart from one occasion when we used the Mayflower Terminal and there was seating there.

 

With Ocean Terminal we sit first and then book in. With the Mayflower Terminal we booked in first and then sat and waited to be called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a large seating area in Mayflower for our Princess cruise.

You don't say when this was but it may be in the meantime Mayflower has undergone a transformation. There was, what could have been a large seating area, but it had no seats. The space was occupied by the snake like procession of queuing passengers. Maybe Princess are more customer friendly than Cunard which in my experience is not difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We also had a large seating area when we used the Mayflower terminal. This was last year with Cunard.

 

We booked in first and then we waited in the seating area upstairs. This is the opposite way round to what we have done in the Ocean terminal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We also had a large seating area when we used the Mayflower terminal. This was last year with Cunard.

 

We booked in first and then we waited in the seating area upstairs. This is the opposite way round to what we have done in the Ocean terminal.

 

Thanks to you and others for your replies, now I think I get it. For us check-in was so slow, in view of the number of passengers waiting, that it regulated embarkation so that a seating area after check-in wasn't necessary. We didn't see a seating area. Another hold up in our security channel was that only one of two scanners was manned.

As another poster has suggested we arrived at a busy time. Maybe true, but neither I nor others had been given preferred arrival times which works well at Ocean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail Beyond the Ordinary with Oceania Cruises
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: The Widest View in the Whole Wide World
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...