Jump to content
NemoCrownie

Royal Caribbean banning emotional support animals

Recommended Posts

Knowing someone who has a Guide Dog (Registered for the Blind) --- who is an amazing, wonderful, stunning and intelligent superstar of a dog (!) --- I personally would not worry about having an extra clean after following on. To me the issue is NOT these wonderful registered service dogs and the people they support but the idiots who misuse the policy ........

 

Let's not get in to issues re cleaning cabins after service dogs -- there by the grace of God go any of us ....

"Accidents" happen....Just asked the question if this was normally done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ha, Ha. Good one. And to answer AU pilot, yes, it was that cruise. I would think that anyone with blood sugar sensitivities would be able to tell when they need a boost. without a dog to sense it. Or am I just misinformed about this?

 

 

If someone is diabetic and has an excessive drop in blood sugar they will go into a state were it appears like they are very drunk with a similar impact on their reasoning ability. As such it is important to identify low blood sugar early. One of the reasons fragile diabetics will test blood sugar several times a day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are happy that Royal grew a pair, and put a stop to this . We love pets but not on airlines and cruise ships. Now if we could get cruise lines to hold the line concerning dress codes in dinning room. Looking special a few nights is so nice to see both the women and men. It is my opinion it is not to much to ask, and might leave good impression on the younger group to dress somewhat formal and look proud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If someone is diabetic and has an excessive drop in blood sugar they will go into a state were it appears like they are very drunk with a similar impact on their reasoning ability. As such it is important to identify low blood sugar early. One of the reasons fragile diabetics will test blood sugar several times a day.

One of our friends has type 1 diabetes, and a couple extended family members have type 2 diabetes. All of them faithfully check their blood sugar, and have no need for specially trained dogs to alert them to drops in blood sugar. Why do some people require services animals to alert them instead of simply checking their blood sugar regularly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
I have read here on CC where there were a few issues with 'service animals' aboard some X ships, yet personally, I have never seen or seen any evidence of them on our sailings...

 

How prevalent are they aboard, I wonder or does anyone have experience as such, either using or seeing them aboard?

 

The few service dogs we have seen on cruise ships were very well behaved, as were their human companions.

We would be happy to be on a cruise with them anytime.

 

You may have been on ships with them and not even noticed them because they are usually on the floor by their owner's feet in theaters and lounges, and under the table in restaurants.

It is a shame that the people with fake "emotional support" animals create a bad impression and cause problems for those with true service animals.

Edited by fleckle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
........Let's not get in to issues re cleaning cabins after service dogs -- there by the grace of God go any of us ....

 

The two legit Service Dogs I talked about earlier had large sandboxes on the Balcony and the steward took care of the boxes each day. Our friends with the dogs talked about how well they were helped, and were going to make sure the steward and team were taken care of. The SR was quite nice and clean, probably bettter than the cat box I have to clean up!! Boy do I get ‘looks’ from that cat when I lapse!

 

Den

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One of our friends has type 1 diabetes, and a couple extended family members have type 2 diabetes. All of them faithfully check their blood sugar, and have no need for specially trained dogs to alert them to drops in blood sugar. Why do some people require services animals to alert them instead of simply checking their blood sugar regularly?

 

 

If by having a service dog that could alert you (not saying that the person who said that her dog was trained to do that, which I actually doubt. Especially since she said she self trained it.) you could have good control and reduce the number of blood samples taken per day, wouldn't you.

 

The purpose of a service dog is to improve quality of life for the impacted person. I am quite sure that many people with service dogs could survive without them, but their quality of life would be impacted.

 

The one person I know who has one, is a fragile diabetic, who requires more monitoring then normal. The dog was trained to do two primary functions. To notify him if something was wrong. The second thing is if he did not respond correctly was to pull on a rope attached to a device that automatically generated a 911 call with a recorded message.

 

Having the dog has allowed him to live alone and has saved his life at least once that I know of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those of you hoping the airlines will follow suit, they can't. US Airlines are covered by a law other than the ADA, the Air Carrier Access Act, which requires them to accept emotional support animals, but they have all gotten stricter on required documentation from a doctor, etc.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
If by having a service dog that could alert you (not saying that the person who said that her dog was trained to do that, which I actually doubt. Especially since she said she self trained it.) you could have good control and reduce the number of blood samples taken per day, wouldn't you.

 

The purpose of a service dog is to improve quality of life for the impacted person. I am quite sure that many people with service dogs could survive without them, but their quality of life would be impacted.

 

The one person I know who has one, is a fragile diabetic, who requires more monitoring then normal. The dog was trained to do two primary functions. To notify him if something was wrong. The second thing is if he did not respond correctly was to pull on a rope attached to a device that automatically generated a 911 call with a recorded message.

 

Having the dog has allowed him to live alone and has saved his life at least once that I know of.

Thank you for your response. I see the usefulness of a trained service dog for someone whose diabetes is so severe that he wouldn’t be able to live alone otherwise. However, that person probably wouldn’t feel up to traveling, especially if he also requires renal dialysis.

 

I queried my diabetic friends & family last night. They prefer being able to live their lives as normally as possible, and two travel quite frequently for both work and holidays. So, no they don’t want service dogs. They’ve eagerly awaited non-invasive glucose monitoring devices, at least one of which was approved by the FDA last year. The new devices have pros and cons, but some diabetics do use them successfully.

 

I think many people inaccurately use the term “service dog” when referring to both trained service dogs and companion dogs. The purpose of a trained service dog is to allow someone who would not otherwise be able to function independently to have the most normal life possible. Untrained pets do provide emotional support, but pet owners do not require their pets with them to function independently. I missed my dogs when I traveled, but I never felt that my quality of life (or my ability to function independently) was degraded while I was separated from them.

 

Trained service dogs belong with their owners on planes, trains and cruise ships. Companion animals belong with pet sitters, or in kennels, when their owners travel. I applaud Royal Caribbean for stemming the ridiculous proliferation of companion animals being pushed around their ships in prams.

Edited by Silkroad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The two legit Service Dogs I talked about earlier had large sandboxes on the Balcony and the steward took care of the boxes each day. Our friends with the dogs talked about how well they were helped, and were going to make sure the steward and team were taken care of. The SR was quite nice and clean, probably bettter than the cat box I have to clean up!! Boy do I get ‘looks’ from that cat when I lapse!

 

Den

 

At least you get looks!

 

 

I get no warning except the strong odor in a place other than the litter box...

 

bon voyage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for laughs Ham, Mr. Click, and alfredo22.

 

 

My wife and I applaud the efforts of Royal Caribbean to implement an updated policy and define the distinctions in these cases.

We too, have seen and experienced the differences in the behaviors of humans and their service dogs, and those people traveling with their pets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Only one time I have seen a couple of Schnauzers in a baby stroller onboard the Oasis OTS

Last week I complimented a schnauzer that was in a baby stroller....the parents were none too pleased...one UGLY baby...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We are happy that Royal grew a pair, and put a stop to this . We love pets but not on airlines and cruise ships. Now if we could get cruise lines to hold the line concerning dress codes in dinning room. Looking special a few nights is so nice to see both the women and men. It is my opinion it is not to much to ask, and might leave good impression on the younger group to dress somewhat formal and look proud.

 

Nice try to turn this into another dress code discussion! That's called hijacking around here. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I saw this and came to Cruise Critic to see what was being posted. I can't believe it isn't being discussed so I will start the discussion and say I hope this will also apply to Celebrity and I hope it is enforced.

 

https://cruisefever.net/royal-...imals-from-their-cruise-ships/

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

This is a GREAT thing-- far different that true trained SERVICE dogs

 

as one with allergies/asthma-- flying near a cat makes me ill. and the abuse of the purpose of support animals --which are often PETS-- has made this necessary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We are happy that Royal grew a pair, and put a stop to this . We love pets but not on airlines and cruise ships. Now if we could get cruise lines to hold the line concerning dress codes in dinning room. Looking special a few nights is so nice to see both the women and men. It is my opinion it is not to much to ask, and might leave good impression on the younger group to dress somewhat formal and look proud.

Stick to the subject matter at hand!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here’s the true test to find out if a dog is truly a service animal....and it really works.

 

Talk to the owner and admire the dog. Say how wonderful it is when service dogs allow folks to be independent and how amazing it is that dogs can be trained for so many support activities. Ask what kind of support their dog provides...and pause to wait for the answer. Ask how it was trained? How much does a service dog cost? Etc

 

The owners of true service dogs love their animals as part of the family and are happy to talk about them. The frauds start to clam up and get nervous...they shut you off.

 

Try it...,you’ll be shocked at how many owners almost panic if you ask about their precious fifi...

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Forums

I go one better: Had a fake service dog hop up to try & grab food from my table.(had one of those fake online service dog vests) I pushed the dog away(big mutt type dog) I then said to the owner "What service does your dog provide?" The owner said "Oh he's for handicapped people". I said that's NOT what I asked. What service does the dog provide? The guy started getting snotty. Well, I then snapped a pic with my phone, told the guy I was calling the police & that he will be charged for fraud & pay up to $2000 fine & 6 months in jail.

That clown shot out of the Sam's Club as fast as he could run. The greeter at the entrance saw the entire episode & prevents the guy from coming in from now on. Sometimes you have to be a jerk to get things done right.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am pleased to learn of RCL’s decision. People were exploiting the real need of service dogs by trying to bring pets onboard under the guise of an emotional support dog. On a recent Summit cruise we heard a dog barking at dinner in the MDR. We could not believe what we heard.

Sure enough, the next night we observed a woman wheeling into the restaurant a small dog in a carriage. We said something to the waiter who basically shrugged and said it was up to the maitre’d to allow such things to happen.

I hope this ban spreads to other cruise lines companies and airlines.

IMHO people bringing dogs to all sorts of places has gotten out of hand.

Just today, I was walking on our small town’s Main Street.

There is a small food market that has sidewalk tables for outside eating.

A man was sitting at one of the tables with two small dogs. One was on his lap,the other on a leash blocking most of the sidewalk. As I approached that section of the sidewalk, I assumed the man would have the dog move closer to the table giving me room to walk. It was not the

case, I had to step around the dog ,going on the curb,to get passed it.

In retrospect, I should have nicely asked the man to move his dog so I could pass, but confrontation is not my thing.

If he wouldn't move his dog from my path, he'd be able to take the next trip to the moon to pick him up. I have NO problem being confrontational with D/B's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And therein lies the problem. You, me or the Cruise line do not know whether that dog is a legitimate Service Dog. The cruise line follows the ADA and the ADA does not allow any host or service provider to ask for documentation as to whether the dog is a service animal. They are allowed to ask two questions, 1. Is this a service animal and 2. what task does it provide. Additionally, in the US there is no such thing as registering service dogs that is official and the dogs under most circumstances do not need be on a leash or wear a vest. Below is a link from the US justice Dept which is a pretty good explanation of the law under the ADA. Also, service dogs and support dogs are two totally different things. There are many cases where there are small dogs that are there to detect diabetes but usually that dog will be carried by the owner so it can detect the breath.

 

One other thing which you will see in the directive, if you have an allergy due to the dog, guess what, you lose...

 

https://www.ada.gov/service_animals_2010.htm

That stupid law is absolutely rampant with allowing fraud!

There should be viable certification & heavy fines for those who commit fraud. You're in law enforcement, I think you know what I mean. If you're a business owner, you can't really ask any pertinent proof of authenticity. I'd love to know what leftist snowflakes wrote the law & fire the lot of them. The laws NEED to be rewritten to weed out the fraudsters who make up probably over 75% of the supposed service/emotional animals out there. Support "Peacock", indeed!(remember that one from several months ago?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That stupid law is absolutely rampant with allowing fraud!

There should be viable certification & heavy fines for those who commit fraud. You're in law enforcement, I think you know what I mean. If you're a business owner, you can't really ask any pertinent proof of authenticity. I'd love to know what leftist snowflakes wrote the law & fire the lot of them. The laws NEED to be rewritten to weed out the fraudsters who make up probably over 75% of the supposed service/emotional animals out there. Support "Peacock", indeed!(remember that one from several months ago?)

 

I only provided the link which says it is illegal to ask for documentation, I may not agree with it and do see it but that’s the law. There are loads of videos on you tube and very often when people ask for documentation and refuse entry, they are visited within a few days by the feds. Problem with fraud is how do you prove it when you can’t ask for the proof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually know someone with an emotional support dog. This person has PTSD & the dog allows this person to live a much more fulfilled 'normal' life than would otherwise be possible. They have certification from a Dr. (a real Dr., not something they paid for on the internet) the dog wears a vest (that clearly spells out that he is an emotional support dog, not the orange type) They could have easily faked a true support dog vest, but don't, & so they stand the risk of overly aggressive people asking questions. Unless they are walking, he just lies quietly at the owner's feet.

 

I completely agree that the dogs in strollers, dogs eating off of plates, not using the proper places to relieve themselves is out of control, but before you choose to "make a stand" & try to shame someone who has one of these dogs working with them, just remember you may be confronting a war veteran, a former police officer, or firefighter with PTSD who needs the support of that animal... & no, that does not, in my opinion, make them a snowflake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I actually know someone with an emotional support dog. This person has PTSD & the dog allows this person to live a much more fulfilled 'normal' life than would otherwise be possible. They have certification from a Dr. (a real Dr., not something they paid for on the internet) the dog wears a vest (that clearly spells out that he is an emotional support dog, not the orange type) They could have easily faked a true support dog vest, but don't, & so they stand the risk of overly aggressive people asking questions. Unless they are walking, he just lies quietly at the owner's feet.

 

I completely agree that the dogs in strollers, dogs eating off of plates, not using the proper places to relieve themselves is out of control, but before you choose to "make a stand" & try to shame someone who has one of these dogs working with them, just remember you may be confronting a war veteran, a former police officer, or firefighter with PTSD who needs the support of that animal... & no, that does not, in my opinion, make them a snowflake.

You really need to tell this person that his/her dog is a service dog, as PTSD is a covered disability under the ADA rules and regulations (see below) and this person needs to throw away the emotional support dog vest away, because emotional support dogs are not allowed in public buildings (only allowed in airplanes and housing), whereas service dogs are allowed everywhere.

 

Service animals are defined as dogs that are individually trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities. Examples of such work or tasks include guiding people who are blind, alerting people who are deaf, pulling a wheelchair, alerting and protecting a person who is having a seizure, reminding a person with mental illness to take prescribed medications, calming a person with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) during an anxiety attack, or performing other duties. Service animals are working animals, not pets. The work or task a dog has been trained to provide must be directly related to the person’s disability.

https://www.ada.gov/service_animals_2010.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I only provided the link which says it is illegal to ask for documentation, I may not agree with it and do see it but that’s the law. There are loads of videos on you tube and very often when people ask for documentation and refuse entry, they are visited within a few days by the feds. Problem with fraud is how do you prove it when you can’t ask for the proof.

That's why I can't stand the officious govt. idiots who think they know better than all of the rest of us. Had they thought it out to require proper documentation without having to know about the "disability", it would have made this a moot point. As it is now, it almost "purposely" makes it way too easy to commit fraud. I'm glad that at least some states are starting to punish those who skirt the law. There's also talk about revamping the ADA law to weed out the fakers out there. It amazes me that you can go online & get these fake service vests,often with an attorney's name attached to the web page telling you that no one can prove you're committing fraud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no such thing as written proof of a service dog and it is illegal to ask for any written proof. One can ask two questions: Is this a service dog? and What task does it perform?

You're right there is no written proof, but there damn well should be & I'm glad that some states are finally starting to do something about it. It is ONLY illegal for a business owner to demand written proof. As a private citizen I can ask any question I choose. If the person I ask becomes confrontational, that is always a good sign of a fake. Yes, I will & have shamed those who commit fraud. Have you ever had to help separate a dog fight, because a fake service dog went in a store & attacked a service dog. It happened to 2 friends. The owner of the fake service dog wound up paying for the injuries to her service dog & herself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're right there is no written proof, but there damn well should be & I'm glad that some states are finally starting to do something about it. It is ONLY illegal for a business owner to demand written proof. As a private citizen I can ask any question I choose. If the person I ask becomes confrontational, that is always a good sign of a fake. Yes, I will & have shamed those who commit fraud. Have you ever had to help separate a dog fight, because a fake service dog went in a store & attacked a service dog. It happened to 2 friends. The owner of the fake service dog wound up paying for the injuries to her service dog & herself.

 

Two points regarding your posts.

 

1. I have read that the reason they do not require ID is because of the Hippa laws in the US. Don't know for certain.

 

2. Any person who you may confront is under no obligation to answer any of your questions. If it was me and you approached me I would just ignore you. Problem is I think some people come out with their fake dogs and don't check to see what the law actually says, their just dumb, its the informed person that can get by with the fake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for your response. I see the usefulness of a trained service dog for someone whose diabetes is so severe that he wouldn’t be able to live alone otherwise. However, that person probably wouldn’t feel up to traveling, especially if he also requires renal dialysis.

 

I queried my diabetic friends & family last night. They prefer being able to live their lives as normally as possible, and two travel quite frequently for both work and holidays. So, no they don’t want service dogs. They’ve eagerly awaited non-invasive glucose monitoring devices, at least one of which was approved by the FDA last year. The new devices have pros and cons, but some diabetics do use them successfully.

 

Lows for some people with T1 come on very fast, with little warning. By the time the person could register that they're low, their cognitive function can be affected which delays treatment and leads to a potentially dangerous situation. Your friends sound like they aren't in this camp, which is great for them - but that's not the case for everyone. For those people, the dogs are an important part of being able to live a normal life. For parents of young children, the dogs are a godsend, allowing everyone to sleep better at night. I've been there, done that, got the kid with T1 diabetes and an insulin pump to prove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're right there is no written proof, but there damn well should be & I'm glad that some states are finally starting to do something about it. It is ONLY illegal for a business owner to demand written proof. As a private citizen I can ask any question I choose. If the person I ask becomes confrontational, that is always a good sign of a fake. Yes, I will & have shamed those who commit fraud. Have you ever had to help separate a dog fight, because a fake service dog went in a store & attacked a service dog. It happened to 2 friends. The owner of the fake service dog wound up paying for the injuries to her service dog & herself.
I agree, there should be some sort of registration; ala, handicap license plates, but if you talk with any of the service dog organizations, many don't want this, because they feel (which I don't quite understand) is that the privacy of the person with the dog is at risk.

 

One of my friends took his dog, Katie, on her first airline trip and they said they will never do it again, because of the untrained emotional support dogs and their behavior, which is so unfortunate that he will never fly again.

 

No, I've never had to separate a fight between a service dog (who are trained not to fight back) and an emotional support dog, but I don't think it is up to individuals to interrogate people with dogs, since one wouldn't know who has a true service dog and an emotional support or faker dog. It should be left up to the authorities. What we can do is write letters to our local, state and national governments and ask them to do something about the fakers and ask for a national service dog registration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Two points regarding your posts.

 

1. I have read that the reason they do not require ID is because of the Hippa laws in the US. Don't know for certain.

 

If there can be handicap license plates, which require documentation, it shouldn't be an issue for service dogs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before we go around the bend on officious govt idiots should require documents and thinking we can intervene and ask questions, it is the people cheating that are the issue. If they are going to get service vests, they are going to get a fake document. They are the problem not the program. And confronting, or asking questions? That’s all a disabled person needs is us playing investigator.Kind of like the current situation where neighbors are calling 911 because a black fireman was going door to door checking the neighborhood.

 

And what happens if they ignore you, which is what I’d do, or not respond the way you think they should? Nothing. You are going to embarrass or harass the legit person and you aren’t going to shame the perpetrator. The lady with the lap dog or in the carriage or barking pet doesnt care. She knows everyone knows she’s faking it.

 

When I saw the pet in the restaurant, and I started to get upset, my wife reminded me, that is what the lady wants, so sit back and enjoy our situation and ignore her idiocy. The only ones really being inconvenienced is the waitstaff and that’s the decison of the restaurant/company/Cruise Line.

 

I think I’ve taken “Don Quiote” to heart more and have quit jousting windmills. I remember when Don Q’s family wanted to lock him away and sang “We Are Only Thinking Of Him!”. Great reminder.....for me.

 

Den

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said earlier there are a lot if videos on this subject and the ignorance of store keepers, police, owners of dogs and just people confronting dogs legitimate or not. Would anyone get arrested because you saw an actual service dog and didn’t want to enter the establishment. Check the videos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lows for some people with T1 come on very fast, with little warning. By the time the person could register that they're low, their cognitive function can be affected which delays treatment and leads to a potentially dangerous situation. Your friends sound like they aren't in this camp, which is great for them - but that's not the case for everyone. For those people, the dogs are an important part of being able to live a normal life. For parents of young children, the dogs are a godsend, allowing everyone to sleep better at night. I've been there, done that, got the kid with T1 diabetes and an insulin pump to prove it.

Thank you. That’s good to know. You’re right. I haven’t personally known anyone whose lows came that fast. That sounds like a nightmare for parents!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As a private citizen I can ask any question I choose. If the person I ask becomes confrontational, that is always a good sign of a fake. Yes, I will & have shamed those who commit fraud.

 

So, in your grand omniscience you have an infallible knowledge of exactly who is or who is not a fraud. You can tell at a glance with 100% accuracy that a dog is not there because his person has diabetes, epilepsy, or PTSD. And only a fraudster would become upset with some nosy, confrontational stranger who has no business demanding answers to anything, let alone something as deeply personal as their medical history? You're willing to confront anyone with a dog, because in YOUR opinion they are a fake? Sorry, but 2 wrongs don't make a right. And the harassment you admit to is not right.

 

I truly hope you meet my DDs BIL and his dog one day. His dog has been a godsend, as he has suffered from PTSD after being injured by an IED in Afghanistan years ago. On a bad day, if you confronted him in such an intrusive manner, you would likely find yourself staring up at him from the floor. On a good day, especially if the dog was on his toes, he'd probably just ask for security or cops to charge you with harassment and haul you away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so happy the cruise lines are taking the stand against emotional support dogs. First of all, please know I have nothing against service animals. They should be able to go just about anywhere. Support animals are a different story. It's not that I don't believe they can help some people handle situations. But there is so much abuse and where does it end?? There are a number of programs which use horses and horseback riding to work with emotionally challenged individuals. Should people be able to bring their emotional support horse onboard? Or what about emotional support peacocks, like that dolt on an airplane tried to bring? Or maybe emotional support pigs, or emotional support monkeys? Where would it end?!

 

And finally, I have a number of people in my family with psychological issues including panic attacks, depression, severe anxiety, and more, so I do not say this lightly or uncaring. But if you are so unstable that you must have an emotional support animal with you in order to travel, then perhaps your issues are not enough under control that you should be traveling at all. (again, I am not talking about service animals!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree, there should be some sort of registration; ala, handicap license plates, but if you talk with any of the service dog organizations, many don't want this, because they feel (which I don't quite understand) is that the privacy of the person with the dog is at risk.

 

One of my friends took his dog, Katie, on her first airline trip and they said they will never do it again, because of the untrained emotional support dogs and their behavior, which is so unfortunate that he will never fly again.

 

No, I've never had to separate a fight between a service dog (who are trained not to fight back) and an emotional support dog, but I don't think it is up to individuals to interrogate people with dogs, since one wouldn't know who has a true service dog and an emotional support or faker dog. It should be left up to the authorities. What we can do is write letters to our local, state and national governments and ask them to do something about the fakers and ask for a national service dog registration.

The fight by the way was between a service dog & a large Pitbull mix. The service dog nearly had to get put down. The cost to the owner with the Phony "service" dog amounted to well over $100K between medical bills & pain & suffering law suit.. I feel you are absolutely correct in writing to govt. officials about setting up a legit service dog registration. States are at least starting to take action on this, as it should be. Banning emotional support animals, or at least caging them on airlines would be a great step.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Before we go around the bend on officious govt idiots should require documents and thinking we can intervene and ask questions, it is the people cheating that are the issue. If they are going to get service vests, they are going to get a fake document. They are the problem not the program. And confronting, or asking questions? That’s all a disabled person needs is us playing investigator.Kind of like the current situation where neighbors are calling 911 because a black fireman was going door to door checking the neighborhood.

 

And what happens if they ignore you, which is what I’d do, or not respond the way you think they should? Nothing. You are going to embarrass or harass the legit person and you aren’t going to shame the perpetrator. The lady with the lap dog or in the carriage or barking pet doesnt care. She knows everyone knows she’s faking it.

 

When I saw the pet in the restaurant, and I started to get upset, my wife reminded me, that is what the lady wants, so sit back and enjoy our situation and ignore her idiocy. The only ones really being inconvenienced is the waitstaff and that’s the decison of the restaurant/company/Cruise Line.

 

I think I’ve taken “Don Quiote” to heart more and have quit jousting windmills. I remember when Don Q’s family wanted to lock him away and sang “We Are Only Thinking Of Him!”. Great reminder.....for me.

 

Den

I'm in the food industry, so having "pets" around food is NOT a good thing. Yes, I've done the pic snap & "fake" reporting to the police as well as the $2000 fine & 6 mo. in jail for fraud. Hate to say, every time I did it, it worked. It's easy to spot the fake. A service animal is well trained, the fakes obviously are not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As I said earlier there are a lot if videos on this subject and the ignorance of store keepers, police, owners of dogs and just people confronting dogs legitimate or not. Would anyone get arrested because you saw an actual service dog and didn’t want to enter the establishment. Check the videos.

There's a pub in Woodstock, VT that has a sign on the door simply saying that service dogs are allowed but that emotional pets are not. It goes into pretty good detail differentiating the 2. I asked the mgr. about it & he said it works fine. He said the main problem was dealing with out of town tourists who insist on bring their pets in. He calls the police & they take care of the problem. I don't remember the name of the place, but it's on the same side as the Woodstock Inn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great move RCCL!! Hopefully the airlines follow and fast. People are definitely abusing and making a complete mockery of a real need for a small few. I’m sure no one has a problem with a person that has a disability and requires a trained dog. I think it was a good decision

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have been on a cruise with a true service animal (blind owner) and another with perhaps 6-8 seeing eye dogs; their owners were in a group, with family members, All the dogs were impeccably behaved; there was an area on the promenade deck--large box with wood mulch--on each cruise for the animals' sanitary habits.

 

I have seen several 'support' dogs as well. One at least was obviously just a pet and was allowed to run all over different venues, much like any small pet dog. I wasn't particularly bothered, but I could see some people were.

 

I see no reason support animals shouldn't be registered, licensed and actually trained, as true service dogs are. I can also see no reason anyone who truly needed one wouldn't be glad to go through the process. Refusing to do this, or getting some fake certification should disallow the pet.

 

I know that there are many people who do have small service animals for legitimate reasons, such as seizure detection. It's too bad that the selfish who just want to take their pet along manage to muddy the waters for the true need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Explore the Night. Sweepstakes - Enter now for a chance to win win a free cruise for two with Azamara Club Cruises!
      • Forum Assistance
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Member Cruise Reviews
      • Community Contests
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×