Jump to content

Freedom AMP- new livery?


kruzerci
 Share

Recommended Posts

Stumbled across this on Instagram today. Hopefully they aren’t planning on expanding the new blue Voyager of the Seas livery to Freedom and future amplifications 🤮, but it looks like they may be preparing it for a new hull color. 

CF80DBA6-C381-46E6-A75C-49034FD36B76.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if it's just me but seeing the blue hull makes the ship older to me. I prefer the solid white but if Freedom get's the blue i'm still going on my cruise in October. I'll live with whatever color they decide.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FlowBroTy said:

I am probably the only one here that likes it!


I like it.  It is also supposed to be the paint that provides less resistance when moving in the water. On that note could they not add a tint to the colour to have the same capabilities but be white?

 

Light blue or white, I’m still going. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Whilst on the ship you are at least spared the sight of it. Just as Guy de Maupassant, the French writer, lunched every day in the restaurant underneath the Eiffel Tower though he hated the sight of it said "inside the restaurant was one of the few places in Paris where I could sit and not actually see the Tower".

 

Regards,

 

Cublet

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2020 at 12:51 PM, A&L_Ont said:


I like it.  It is also supposed to be the paint that provides less resistance when moving in the water. On that note could they not add a tint to the colour to have the same capabilities but be white?

 

Light blue or white, I’m still going. 

No, the paint used above the waterline is vastly different from that used below the waterline.  The "topsides" paint that everyone is commenting on is simply a two part polyurethane or epoxy paint.  The "bottom" paint you are referring to, which is used strictly below the waterline (you can see a partial band of it right at the water on the Voyager pictures above), is a two part polyurethane or epoxy coating that contains a high quantity of Teflon (PTFE) to provide a hard, slippery surface.  While the new blue paint on Voyager's topsides would cost around $50-70/gallon, the bottom paint is around $300-400/gallon.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, icsys said:

The new livery is Rust

 

E084BBC6-CC53-4342-8AB0-1EC0873AEFDA.jpeg

 

This is known as "flash" rust, and is caused simply by the humidity in the air on steel that has been blasted to SA2 quality.  This used to be a problem, and was why they blasted a segment of a ship and then coated it right away.  Today's anti-corrosive paints (primers), are formulated to attack this flash rust, convert it to a stable element, and bond it to the steel, so this kind of thing is no longer a problem for today's marine coatings.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, chengkp75 said:

No, the paint used above the waterline is vastly different from that used below the waterline.  The "topsides" paint that everyone is commenting on is simply a two part polyurethane or epoxy paint.  The "bottom" paint you are referring to, which is used strictly below the waterline (you can see a partial band of it right at the water on the Voyager pictures above), is a two part polyurethane or epoxy coating that contains a high quantity of Teflon (PTFE) to provide a hard, slippery surface.  While the new blue paint on Voyager's topsides would cost around $50-70/gallon, the bottom paint is around $300-400/gallon.


Thanks for the info Chief. In theory they could have kept the white above the water line VS the light blue. Just keeping with the new colour scheme going forward I guess. 

Edited by A&L_Ont
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't love how the blue looks up close, but in the other photos from farther away its not nearly as bad.

 

chengkp75 - Thanks for posting that interesting info! I always enjoy reading your comments and thank you for your expertise that you share with everyone here on CC.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, A&L_Ont said:


Thanks for the info Chief. In theory they could have kept the white above the water line VS the light blue. Just keeping with the new colour scheme going forward I guess. 

Yes, they could have.  Sometimes on older ships it is better to blast down to bare steel and start over with all new coatings (typically two coats of anti-corrosive and two coats of top coat), or sometimes they will just "sand sweep" and take off the outer layer and recoat.  I'm not sure if that is the same blue as Oasis and Quantum, as those blues tend to "disappear" into white in certain lighting, time will tell as more photos of Voyager appear.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It took people a bit of time to notice it on Oasis when she first came out. Throw in some bright sun and reflection from the deep blue ocean it isn’t too noticeable.
 

It isn’t RC traditional colours but it seems to be that as ships are hitting dry dock and being amplified they are getting the new paint scheme. When you are on board looking out you never notice it. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail Beyond the Ordinary with Oceania Cruises
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: The Widest View in the Whole Wide World
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...