clo Posted April 6 #26 Share Posted April 6 22 minutes ago, ronrick1943 said: But we shouldn't say never---it could happen-it just hasn't happen yet on "O". Exactly. The times they are a changing 😞 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snaefell3 Posted April 6 #27 Share Posted April 6 3 hours ago, Snaefell3 said: It was human error/negligence; it could as easily been O. 2 hours ago, ORV said: No, it's never happened with O. So let's not create issues where none have EVER existed. Cheerleading is one thing, but claiming O is not subject to human error is another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare ORV Posted April 6 #28 Share Posted April 6 1 minute ago, Snaefell3 said: Cheerleading is one thing, but claiming O is not subject to human error is another. Get back to me when it happens on O. Nothing to do with cheerleading. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snaefell3 Posted April 6 #29 Share Posted April 6 3 hours ago, ORV said: Get back to me when it happens on O. Nothing to do with cheerleading. What was that boilerplate caveat that I keep seeing? "Past performance is no guarantee of future results". 🤷♂️ But as I said upthread... Now that we have a terrible example, *nobody* is going to be making *that* mistake any time soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snaefell3 Posted April 7 #30 Share Posted April 7 On 4/5/2024 at 10:37 PM, Snaefell3 said: But as I said upthread... Now that we have a terrible example, *nobody* is going to be making *that* mistake any time soon. Pass the salt, please. I've got some words to eat. Genting Dream left 46?, 50? passengers at the dock in Singapore on Mar 29 2024. No word on whether they were "guarantee" or "assigned a cabin", but they'd "printed out their boarding passes". All I can say is it's China-owned, Jake. ::shrugs:: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clo Posted April 7 #31 Share Posted April 7 On 4/5/2024 at 7:04 PM, Snaefell3 said: Cheerleading is one thing, but claiming O is not subject to human error is another. I saw a Convo on a food site. Everyone had loved the item except one person who quite politely said what she didn't like. Oh my, did she ever get bashed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clo Posted April 7 #32 Share Posted April 7 On 4/5/2024 at 10:37 PM, Snaefell3 said: What was that boilerplate caveat that I keep seeing? "Past performance is no guarantee of future results". 🤷♂️ But as I said upthread... Now that we have a terrible example, *nobody* is going to be making *that* mistake any time soon. And how many billions in debt is the O parent company??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snaefell3 Posted April 7 #33 Share Posted April 7 7 minutes ago, clo said: And how many billions in debt is the O parent company??? Not sure how that relates to forgetting to do move-up/down/over offers and leaving folks on the dock or not, but $12 billion, about half of it from the shutdown. On the other hand, NCLH is in the black and looking up: $8.6B earnings for '23; estimated $9.3B for '24, and $10.0B for '25. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now