Jump to content

jeynon

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

Posts posted by jeynon

  1. On 6/17/2017 at 4:47 PM, LindsayCumber1997 said:

    Wondering if it's acceptable for my husband, who is active duty military to wear his dress blues on formal night?

     

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Forums

    Definitely appropriate!  I am retired Navy O-5 and would not hesitate.  I have been on cruises where retired flag officers dressed out in Dinner Dress Uniforms...the most formal a Navy officer can dress. (equivalent to civilian Tuxedo wear) Wear the Service Dress Blues with pride!

    • Like 1
  2. 1 hour ago, harkinmr said:

    The answer is very simple.  Because the cruise lines are trying to reduce the risk of an outbreak onboard, as well as the severity of that outbreak and the consequences of such (i.e., full ship quarantine and/or halting the cruise with a return to the port of origin).  A 100% vaccinated cruise ship allows them to address those issues in a much easier and less risky fashion.  Certainly easier and less risky than an unvaccinated crew and passenger cohort.

     

    As to your point on health questionnaires being deemed "satisfactory", passengers have been notoriously dishonest when completing those questionnaires and have brought infectious diseases like the flu onboard and sickened passengers.  Cruise lines may want to try to get away with just the questionnaire, but they know that it generally is not trustworthy.

     

    Vaccines are not "experimental gene therapy".  Please don't spread misinformation.

    Fully vaccinated crew and passenger list will only be a false sense of health security. Already it is acknowledged that mRNA vaccines most likely will not prevent transmission of variants. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/variants-may-be-responsible-for-coronavirus-cases-that-evade-vaccines-cdc-finds/ar-BB1fTPKW?li=BBnbfcL

     

    In response to your "gene therapy statement, Copied from Moderna website: 

    What is mRNA?

    Messenger RNA, or mRNA, plays a fundamental role in human biology, transferring the instructions stored in DNA to make the proteins required in every living cell. mRNA provides instructions to cells to make protein. Moderna’s approach is to use mRNA medicines to instruct a patient’s own cells to produce proteins that could prevent, treat, or cure disease. We are also working to advance the development mRNA therapeutics that restore the activity of missing enzymes responsible for various rare diseases, such as methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) and propionic acidemia (PA).  Perhaps "gene therapy" semantically is incorrect, however by Moderna's own admission the messenger RNA over rides the bodies natural DNA instructions. By any stretch of the terminology, it cannot be called a true vaccine.

  3. 26 minutes ago, HappyInVan said:

     

    Could you provide links to these claims???

     

    "A recent report by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington found that if 95% of Americans wore masks, almost 70,000 lives would be saved. 

    N95 masks offer the best protection, but they are in short supply, and the CDC is asking people not to go out and buy them, because they are urgently needed by health care workers."

     

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/22/health/coronavirus-how-to-protect-yourself-wellness/index.html

     

    http://www.healthdata.org/sites/default/files/files/Projects/COVID/briefing_US_20201112.pdf

     

     

    UCLA study was conducted in 2001 in response to Anthrax attacks. Conclusion of study, Surgical masks were too porous to prevent the inhalation of the spores which are larger than Corona Virus...as stated in the research.  http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/detect/antdetect_intro.html  Additional links regarding ineffectiveness of surgical and cloth masks:   https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

    the New England Journal of Medicine on May 21, 2020:

    We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

    So, one can only conclude the "science" is agenda driven and politicized to invoke a system of medical tyranny and a global agenda.  The Bible tells us that no one will be able to buy or sell without the Mark.  We have never in our lifetime seen such disregard for personal liberty and freedoms, all in the guise of our savior, big Government wants to protect us from ourselves!  

  4. 9 hours ago, Laminator said:

    I agree with you. I don't want to be stuck in our cabin for 2 weeks while some bureaucrats figure out what to do with us.

    You all are living in altered reality, false sense of security by getting an experimental vaccine that you and others will no longer be able to become infected or transmit the virus to anyone else. Fauci and the CDC already acknowledge that, although the "chances" are low, it does not ensure 100% prevention of spread of infection.  The mRNA drug producers acknowledge their products will require continued "boosters", and most likely will not prevent infection from variants or mutations of the Covid 19 virus. I will bet you that you still believe masks prevent the spread of the virus and yet the majority of the people now being infected attest to following the protocol of wearing masks in public. . If in fact the vaccine is effective and masks prevent the spread of the virus, then a reasonable person should no longer be living in a state of fear and apprehension!

  5. Totally agree with this position not requiring an experimental vaccine in order to travel. The CDC will not confirm that it will keep anyone from becoming infected, or becoming a "spreader". Masks and social distancing are still prescribed for those who have been vaccinated.  If masks are in fact effective in preventing transmission, or becoming infected by the virus, and the PCR test is in fact accurate...why the concern and demand for everyone to be vaccinated? It is a false sense of security to believe over 3000 passengers on a cruise ship who have been fully vaccinated are no longer potential spreaders.  Already mRNA gene therapy providers are admitting "booster" shots will be needed, and the vaccines may not protect anyone from variants and mutations of the Corona Virus.  Health questionnaires have been deemed satisfactory, taking passengers word that they do not knowingly have contagious diseases that are far more contagious, and have significantly higher mortality rates!  Travel involves risk. Every individual needs to decide for themselves whether the benefits out weigh the risks.  I willing take my chances with the belief that I have a 99.7 percent chance of surviving Covid 19 without taking an experimental gene therapy drug. Just say NO to vaccine passports...hey, my body my choice, Right?

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...