Jump to content

JWJs

Members
  • Posts

    2,246
  • Joined

Posts posted by JWJs

  1. As he always does, Dave has given you very good information and advice above. I'll add that I do have the 18-200mm lens as a walking around/travel lens for my a6000; I recognize the compromises, but when I am traveling, particularly with my spouse, changing lenses is often not the best option. The 18-200 has worked well for me for the purpose for which I bought it. (I have the 16-50mm kit lens as well, and often just keep that on the camera. I certainly would not want the 18-200 to be my only lens for the a6000.)

     

    Here are a couple of images that I shot with the 18-200 during a trip to Paris last fall:

     

    Opera%20House%20ceiling%20detail%202%201024x683_zpsgvlyzdck.jpg

     

    (detall of the Chagall ceiling in the Paris Opera House, 68mm)

     

     

    Place%20des%20Vosges%20fountain%202smaller%201024x741_zpsf1ssxchm.jpg

     

    (Place des Vosges, 92mm)

     

    Thanks for the info and pictures. Sure helps to make decisions. :)

  2. The LE version is an ok lens for a all-in-one option. The original SEL18200 was a bit sharper, though slightly larger and heavier. I never really looked at all-in-ones as an option since a lot of my photography is travel and family events where the 16-50 (remarkably good if you know it's limits) kit lens fit my needs best. I also usually carry a second body with the 55-210 (another winner withing it's limits) attached when a longer reach may be needed, so the long end of the 18-200 was covered as well. Both of the kit lenses are optically better than the 18-200 but the trade-off in image quality for convenience is a personal choice.

     

    I recently picked up the 18-105 f/4 G lens a a sharper option for travel and while it certainly is better than the 16-50 optically, it is rather large (about the same as the 18-200). I got used to the size and was very pleased with the results but lugging the larger lens isn't for everyone. I did keep the 16-50 since it is an excellent jacket pocket option on the A6000 and will continue to be the choice for business travel.

     

    If the reason you haven't used the camera in a year is the bulk of the 18-200, I would suggest picking up a 16-50 for your travel needs.

     

    Here is a link to our late 2014 trip on the Allure. The 16-50 was used for the majority of the shots.

     

    http://galleries.pptphoto.com/allure

     

    Dave

     

    Thank you. I am major considering purchasing the 16-50. Just a few days until we leave for our cruise so I need to get the purchase done. I also need to purchase filters. Thanks again. I appreciate the information.

  3. What's your opinion of the E 18-200 lens--(SEL 18200LE)? Purchased for a cruise and still in the box. This is the only one I have for my 6000. I have had this camera for a year now and have not used it. Need to know best lenses for the cruise. Thank you.

  4.  

    What a fab review. Love your writing style and your family interactions.

     

    It would be so nice to have a means to post some "thumbs up" for each one of your reports. AND...love the pictures you post...excellent photography!

     

    We are looking forward to sailing on this ship in a few short weeks. I was getting seriously worried about the size of the ship and some other things but some of the Cruise Critic community calmed me down.

  5.  

    We have a cruise booked on the Pacific Princess departing Port Everglades on 4/25. This is the last cruise before dry dock and it appears there are a ton of staterooms that have not been booked...around 100 as far as I can determine.

     

    The cruise is 17 nights, Port Everglades to San Pedro.

     

    Would you book this cruise? My concerns are: 1) It is a small ship. 2) If it's not full, will it be s boring cruise? 3) Will part of the service crew be on vacation? 4) Will activities be limited?

  6. Hi Pia. Thanks for posting live from the Coral! Looking forward to reading more posts as you sail along.

    Congratulations on your upgrade from Obstructed View Guarantee all the way to a Mini! Awesome! We got a nice upgrade on our recent Sapphire cruise...from Obstructed View Guarantee to a Balcony. Sure made us happy as I know you and Mike are about your upgrade.

    We only brought on two bottles of wine on our Sapphire cruise out of San Pedro. Good for you bringing on a case with no problem!!!! Should always be that way for sure!

    Best regards.

    JJ

  7. Thank you! :)

     

    My camera is the Nikon 1 J1. My father's camera is the Canon EOS Rebel. And then my sister's camera (which hasn't appeared yet and won't until we get to port) is the Nikon AW100. If you're curious about which camera was used for a particular photo or even the settings used to take them, if you click on the filename link, Flickr will tell you what camera and the exact shutter speed, aperature, etc. for each photo. It's pretty !

     

    Thanks for the camera and Flickr info! Especially cool is the Flickr info! I need a new website for my pictures....was using Webshots which changed to Smile. Don't care for Smile at all...Flickr may be it for me. Thanks again. :) And...I continue to enjoy your photo/review. Love your style!

  8. We did not notice excessive vibration when we had E736 for our Coral Panama Canal cruise.

     

    It was a wonderful cabin. :):):) Would not hesitate to book E736 on the Coral again. The Coral Princess is our favorite ship.

  9. Thanks Sue for all of the fabulous pictures and comments! You just can't beat looking through all of your posts/pictures (more than a couple of times) when you are "hungry" for a cruise like I am right now!

     

    BTW...your photography is wonderful. Great shots! Still love the one with the "little fish" hanging out with you the "bestest" :) and I loved all of your beach and ship pics!

     

    The camera you used was a Canon? And which lens or lenses?

×
×
  • Create New...