Jump to content

mimip

Members
  • Posts

    777
  • Joined

Posts posted by mimip

  1. 12 minutes ago, Daniel A said:

    Absolutely correct.  But along with rights come responsibilities.  Posting false information such as Princess or the CDC requiring 'Fit to Sail' letters and other misinformation as 'facts' is worse than not being helpful.

    I was the one who discussed “Fit to Sail” letters but specifically said that they were a requirement of Celebrity, Royal Caribbean and Norwegian.  Never did I see it in reference to Princess.

    • Thanks 1
  2. 6 minutes ago, Daniel A said:

    You're writing on a Princess Forum.  If you're posting information about Celebrity on this forum, you're creating some confusion as some of what you are posting here doesn't apply to the readers of this forum.

     

    I'm not trying to be snarky to you, I'm just asking that you be a little more selective as to the information you post for us Princess cruisers.  🙂 

    Two forums were merged, so this is not just a Princess forum.

  3. 8 minutes ago, Daniel A said:

    Is your Alaska cruise on Princess?  Princess has not issued any 70+ letter requirement and the new CDC order is very specific as to what conditions will need to be met.  70+ letter was not one of the conditions required by the Federal Government.  If Princess cancels the cruise, then you will be entitled to a refund of the deposit.  It was only non-refundable if you cancelled the cruise before Princess does.

     

    8 minutes ago, Daniel A said:

    No, we are on Celebrity, which requires this letter, downloaded from their site.  Norwegian has one too, but it is not so detailed.  I have spoken to Celebrity and have been told they do not know how long their requirement will last.  And no, the CDC did not order this.  It was the cruise line that put it in place.

    • Thanks 2
  4. 2 minutes ago, AF-1 said:

    mimip;  with all that's happening in the world;  we are about to see a lot of things we think unfair.  We are about to enter into the new normal.  What will it look like?  No one can tell right now.  The entire travel industry is going to go thru a full makeover

    Yes, many people are just struggling to eat and keep a roof over their heads.  So this is minor in the scheme of things.

  5. 5 minutes ago, Daniel A said:

    Right, I've seen them but does anyone know if the government is making the form a requirement?

    The government is requiring the cruise lines to come up with some safeguards.  The letter for those 70+ is one that some of the lines have instituted.  I can’t find out how long this requirement will last.  If it is permanent, many of us will not be cruising.  I have no issues but my husband has diabetes.  We have three cruises booked in 2020, and our March one was cancelled (thankful for that).

  6. 46 minutes ago, DaveSJ711 said:

    Hi, I'm Little Dave and I'm 5 years old.  My dad, Big Dave, tells me that cruising is great fun -- but only if you're old enough.  Some cruise lines don't even allow toddlers like me -- that's unfair!  And I don't get to drink what my dad calls the "hard stuff" -- that's discrimination!  I'm so angry, I would file a lawsuit -- if I only knew what that was.

    😂🤣😅😆

  7. 1 minute ago, RocketMan275 said:

    Age makes those health conditions worse.

    The fact that some think this is age discrimination does not mean the courts will agree.  The commonly applied definition is the one by the EEOC.  

    Not necessarily.  And apparently you haven’t been keeping up with the statistics.  Younger people are getting Covid 19 AND dying in greater numbers now.  

    • Thanks 1
  8. 33 minutes ago, RocketMan275 said:

    You left out the good part.  From the EEOC website:  "An employment policy or practice that applies to everyone, regardless of age, can be illegal if it has a negative impact on applicants or employees age 40 or older and is not based on a reasonable factor other than age (RFOA)."

     

    For an action to be considered 'age discrimination' you must prove it was not 'based on a reasonable factor other than age."  It is easy to argue that since age is a very significant factor in who gets the coronavirus and the health outcomes of the virus that these reasonable factors exist.  The proposed policy does not state that no one over seventy can cruise.  That would clearly be age discrimination.   It states that those over seventy with certain comorbidities, ie, reasonable factors, must have a doctor's statement that they are 'fit to cruise'.

    Again, you are referring to employment which has nothing to do with our discussion.  
    And it has now been found that it is the health condition, not the age that seems to be an issue with Covid 19. 😷

    • Like 1
  9. 20 minutes ago, nini said:

     

    "Age discrimination is the result of actions taken to deny or limit opportunities to people on the basis of age. These are usually actions taken as a result of one's ageist beliefs and attitudes. Age discrimination occurs on both a personal and institutional level."

     

    This one is from LAW.Com and their legal dictionary.

    discrimination

    n. unequal treatment of persons, for a reason which has nothing to do with legal rights or ability. Federal and state laws prohibit discrimination in employment, availability of housing, rates of pay, right to promotion, educational opportunity, civil rights, and use of facilities based on race, nationality, creed, color, age, sex or sexual orientation. The rights to protest discrimination or enforce one's rights to equal treatment are provided in various federal and state laws, which allow for private lawsuits with the right to damages. There are also federal and state commissions to investigate and enforce equal rights.

     

    👍🏻 That works!

  10. 29 minutes ago, RocketMan275 said:

    If  you want to claim that this is illegal discrimination, then the EEOC definition is the important one.  Any claim of age discrimination would have to pass muster with the EEOC.  Without the EEOC, your case would face a very large hurdle in the courts.

    Thanks for the correction:  My dictionary suggested a misspelling of comorbidity:  "In medicine, comorbidity is the presence of one or more additional conditions co-occurring with a primary condition; in the countable sense of the term, a comorbidity is each additional condition. The additional condition may also be a behavioral or mental disorder." Wikipedia.  I think my misspelling was close enough for the meaning to be apparent.  

    Obviously, it wasn’t.  That’s why I researched it and couldn’t find it.  Now, since all cruises are cancelled for another hundred days (effective today), I have plane tickets, hotels and a cruise to cancel!  Over and out!

  11. 1 minute ago, RocketMan275 said:

    Fairness isn't the issue.  Whether there is a rationale reason to treat some differently is the issue.

    At this time, more people of color and younger people are being affected.  So where is your rationale that excluding those over 70 with controlled issues is not discrimination.  And if you google discrimination there are other meanings besides those expressed by the EEOC.  We are not talking employment.  And what are cormordalities?  It didn’t show up in my dictionary.

  12. 5 minutes ago, RocketMan275 said:

    Are you saying that those states that do require an eye test after a certain age are age discriminatory?

    Since these letters do apply to both blacks and males as well as white females, your hypothetical questions are irrelevant.

    This hypothetical statement is not irrelevant.  It is just pointing out how unfair it would be to discriminate on sex and race when deciding who needs this “letter”.

×
×
  • Create New...