knittingGal Posted November 15, 2009 #101 Share Posted November 15, 2009 double posting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knittingGal Posted November 15, 2009 #102 Share Posted November 15, 2009 Yes, just a pair of 10x42 SUMMIT and a pair 8x42 VISTA. You will be all set. I thought the summit are good enough (actually, they are excellent). So I don't know how much better it can get for doubling the price on ZEN. good suggestion. we took our binoculars out at whale watching and could not believe how much more detail you could see with those binoculars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenox Posted November 17, 2009 #103 Share Posted November 17, 2009 It rained at two ports during our cruise. We got a rain coat for $5 at the dock and the binoculars have been soaked with rain without any issue. To me, it seems necessary to have waterproof feature we got 3-in-1 waterproof jackets off Amazon when it was on sale for less than $50. So the rain was not an issue for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nancyquilts Posted November 19, 2009 #104 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Maybe I missed it, but I'm looking for a good pair of compact binoculars - something that would fit in a large pocket. I can't tell from the descriptions on the binocular sites what size they are. Help?:confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NMLady Posted November 19, 2009 #105 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Maybe I missed it, but I'm looking for a good pair of compact binoculars - something that would fit in a large pocket. I can't tell from the descriptions on the binocular sites what size they are. Help?:confused: The ZenRay Vista 8x42 that I bought are about 5 3/4" high x 4 1/2"wide. The ones I bought came with a carrying case that has a strap that can be hooked to the two sides of the case and put around your waist if you wish. They also have a 1/2" wide neck strap. HTH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenox Posted November 19, 2009 #106 Share Posted November 19, 2009 The Vista is fairly compact for the amount of light it can gather. It is also light weight, which is a huge bonus for me. Of course, you can also look at some smaller binoculars 10x25. I personally feel I got eyestrain when try to center my eyes on the smaller glasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmcc Posted December 25, 2009 Author #107 Share Posted December 25, 2009 just got a pair of 10x42 SUMMIT for DH as Christmas gift. He is very happy and thinks it is better than some pairs that are few hundred dollars more expensive he saw in store. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knorrisb07 Posted December 30, 2009 #108 Share Posted December 30, 2009 for inland tour, a good 10x will be very useful to look for critters at long distance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtsm Posted December 31, 2009 #109 Share Posted December 31, 2009 The ZenRay Vista 8x42 that I bought are about 5 3/4" high x 4 1/2"wide. The ones I bought came with a carrying case that has a strap that can be hooked to the two sides of the case and put around your waist if you wish. They also have a 1/2" wide neck strap. HTH. My ZRS 8X42 was originally purchased for the cruise that never materialized. But it's been a great set to have during our recent trip through PacNW, especially on Washingston state ferries and looking for critters in Olympic National Park, Mt. Rainer, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenox Posted January 17, 2010 #110 Share Posted January 17, 2010 My ZRS 8X42 was originally purchased for the cruise that never materialized. But it's been a great set to have during our recent trip through PacNW, especially on Washingston state ferries and looking for critters in Olympic National Park, Mt. Rainer, etc. Yeah, I used my ZRS 10x42 from our hotel room in Seattle to look at the Mt Rainier. I couldn't believe how much detail I can see from such a long distance. It is even better than the blown-up picture I took with 300mm telephoto lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skierT Posted June 9, 2010 #111 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Instead of guessing 10x vs 8x, we end up getting one of each. But honestly, I don't see any problem using 10x. I do like the larger viewing angle with 8x binoculars though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron AKA Posted June 9, 2010 #112 Share Posted June 9, 2010 All ships may not be the same, but we went to Alaska in early May this year on the Carnival Spirit. This ship uses six diesel engines for power, and you can easily feel the low frequency engine vibration through the ship, although some areas were worse than others. I'm quite sure it was the engines, not the props as there was vibration even in port. I used 10X binoculars and tolerated them, but they certainly were not ideal, unless you like watching a very giggly image. On land they are fine. So if you want max magnification hand held on land I would go with 10X, and if you think most viewing will be on the ship (and it was for us), then 8X would be a better compromise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knorrisb07 Posted June 10, 2010 #113 Share Posted June 10, 2010 That's a great advice. I personally prefer 8x too, although I don't find any major issue with 10x. After all, having a pair of binoculars is better than none. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhmom99 Posted June 18, 2010 #114 Share Posted June 18, 2010 we used the 10x SUMMIT binoculars on the cruiseship to watch the birds that fly over the ocean. It took little practice to keep track of them. But eventually, we got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjroadster Posted August 3, 2010 #115 Share Posted August 3, 2010 I have a 200mm telephoto lens. Is it stronger than 8x binoculars? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whale-watcher Posted August 3, 2010 #116 Share Posted August 3, 2010 I have a 200mm telephoto lens. Is it stronger than 8x binoculars? no, much less magnification, and narrow field of view. Worth bringing, but IMO not especially useful for wildlife observation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kGCAL Posted August 4, 2010 #117 Share Posted August 4, 2010 I have a 200mm telephoto lens. Is it stronger than 8x binoculars? my husand has a 300mm lens. It's not as strong as our 8x42 VISTA binoculars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjroadster Posted August 5, 2010 #118 Share Posted August 5, 2010 no, much less magnification, and narrow field of view. Worth bringing, but IMO not especially useful for wildlife observation. We have a 8x20 compact binoculars. I never had a good experience with it since we bought it many years ago. That's why I am thinking getting a telephoto lens instead. Maybe something is wrong with that binoculars? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oceanfun77 Posted August 5, 2010 #119 Share Posted August 5, 2010 Which is lighter and more compact, the 8x42 Summit, or Vista? Any other brand smaller and more compact but comparable quality? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whale-watcher Posted August 5, 2010 #120 Share Posted August 5, 2010 We have a 8x20 compact binoculars. I never had a good experience with it since we bought it many years ago. That's why I am thinking getting a telephoto lens instead. Maybe something is wrong with that binoculars? 8x20 binoculars tend to be dark, with a narrow field of view (unless you splurge for Leica ultravids, or similar brands, costing upwards of $500). You would be better off with a larger size (such as 8x42). A telephoto lens is a GREAT thing to have, especially for wildlife, but does not provide the same viewing pleasure as binoculars... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oceanfun77 Posted August 6, 2010 #121 Share Posted August 6, 2010 Are the 2010 Zen-Ray Vista 8x42 a hunter green color? Do they offer it in black? I was doing more research and it seems like the more compact and lighter Nikon Monarch 8x36 is more expensive than the popular and stronger Nikon Monarch 8x42. Has anyone had experience with the 8x36? Do you think it is suitable for Alaska and for stage shows in a dark room? The thing stopping me from the zen-ray is its hideous color and that it's 24oz. I'm not sure how heavy my SLR camera is, but sometimes I never want to bring it out because it is heavy. The Nikons look so much cuter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjroadster Posted August 6, 2010 #122 Share Posted August 6, 2010 8x20 binoculars tend to be dark, with a narrow field of view (unless you splurge for Leica ultravids, or similar brands, costing upwards of $500). You would be better off with a larger size (such as 8x42). A telephoto lens is a GREAT thing to have, especially for wildlife, but does not provide the same viewing pleasure as binoculars... I understand this better now. It does make sense. Thank you. Are the 2010 Zen-Ray Vista 8x42 a hunter green color? Do they offer it in black? From the picture I saw, the 2010 VISTA 8x42 is black color http://www.zen-ray.com/shop/binoculars/vista8x42.html The ZRS 8x42 is green color. http://www.zen-ray.com/shop/binoculars/zrshd/zrshd8x42.html What are the difference between these two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjroadster Posted August 8, 2010 #123 Share Posted August 8, 2010 I went with 8x42 ZRS HD. I think the compact size and better glass should be well worthy the small difference. But now I am wondering whether 10x is probably better for me? After reading this thread, I do know they are their own pros and cons. Just like choosing 200mm and 300mm lenses back a few years ago. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knorrisb07 Posted August 14, 2010 #124 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I went with 8x42 ZRS HD. I think the compact size and better glass should be well worthy the small difference. But now I am wondering whether 10x is probably better for me? After reading this thread, I do know they are their own pros and cons. Just like choosing 200mm and 300mm lenses back a few years ago. lol That was a good choice. Either one should work. I personally prefer 8x better. Most of my binos are 8x: Elite, ZEN, ZRS HD. I think my next one will be Zeiss 8x. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjroadster Posted August 19, 2010 #125 Share Posted August 19, 2010 it may sound silly. But is it ok to use the waterproof binoculars in the rain? I understand the glasses seal the internal compartment of the binoculars. But will rain do any damage on the external rubber? I treat all my camera, lenses very well. Just don't want mess up the optics when using it improperly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.