Jump to content

Antarctic Backpack


JMB56
 Share

Recommended Posts

I understand that I will receive a “Seabourn WaterShield Waterproof backpack” on my upcoming cruise to Antarctica aboard Venture.  Has anyone seen or received one of these backpacks? My specific question has to do with its size.  Would it be big enough to hold a mirror less camera with a telephoto lens, or should I bring my own waterproof camera bag? Thanks in advance for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are big enough to hold a large camera and a lens, BUT - they are a very flimsy plastic.  Good enough for temporary use.  I measured my husbands and it is about 24" X 14".   I threw mine out as it didn't seem worth keeping. They are the kind that you roll down, and then clip together to keep things from getting wet.  They don't have any external pockets.  It's possible they have changed them since last December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, jjs217 said:

They are big enough to hold a large camera and a lens, BUT - they are a very flimsy plastic.  Good enough for temporary use.  I measured my husbands and it is about 24" X 14".   I threw mine out as it didn't seem worth keeping. They are the kind that you roll down, and then clip together to keep things from getting wet.  They don't have any external pockets.  It's possible they have changed them since last December.

Nope, still the same when we sailed in August 🙂 My camera and my 400mm lens were always inside 🙂

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, jjs217 said:

They are big enough to hold a large camera and a lens, BUT - they are a very flimsy plastic.  Good enough for temporary use.  I measured my husbands and it is about 24" X 14".   I threw mine out as it didn't seem worth keeping. They are the kind that you roll down, and then clip together to keep things from getting wet.  They don't have any external pockets.  It's possible they have changed them since last December.

My husband disagreed with me.  He said they aren't "flimsy plastic", but "thin nylon" and that they worked well and served a purpose.  So, I stand corrected (that doesn't happen very often.)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, jjs217 said:

My husband disagreed with me.  He said they aren't "flimsy plastic", but "thin nylon" and that they worked well and served a purpose.  So, I stand corrected (that doesn't happen very often.)

your husband is a fine man with a keen eye for details 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...