Jump to content

sparks1093

Members
  • Posts

    27,720
  • Joined

About Me

  • Location
    Enosburg Falls, VT
  • Interests
    Cruising
  • Favorite Cruise Line(s)
    CCL, Royal, NCL
  • Favorite Cruise Destination Or Port of Call
    Aruba

Recent Profile Visitors

5,657 profile views

sparks1093's Achievements

20,000+ Club

20,000+ Club (6/15)

  • Great Review Rare

Recent Badges

  1. And as I understand it people bring extension cords and the like for two reasons- 1) there aren't enough outlets in the cabin for their needs or 2) they have a CPAP they need to plug in by the bed. To them it doesn't matter if the cord has a surge protector on it or not, they just need the outlets. There are some people who in their ignorance do bring surge protectors that are confiscated, but all they really needed was an unprotected extension cord. So this makes the number of people "clamoring" for the ability to use a surge protector to shrink even more.
  2. And you think that they don't? According to the Electrical Safety Foundation International (ESFI), over 3300 housefires are caused each year by defective or improperly used surge protectors, power strips and other electrical cords.
  3. Still, a lot of work for only a handful of people at best.
  4. The water from the dispensers on lido is cleaner than what is in the bathroom cabin.
  5. Learned something new today. I don't like ginger beer so never looked too closely at it and didn't realize it's like root beer in that it doesn't have alcohol.
  6. It is an interesting premise- retooling an industry for the convenience of a few people that want to use a certain device for one week. 😉
  7. I suspect that it will all come down to the knowledge of the security person screening it. If they recognize that the ginger beer you have is non-alcoholic they'll let it go. If they don't recognize it they will confiscate it. You might be able to point out that it doesn't contain alcohol but they aren't going to spend a lot of time on the issue- they have thousands of people to screen.
  8. I can only speak for myself but I would mind paying more if I didn't have to. It isn't just cruise ships that are wired this way- it is all ships. So I'm going to guess that to pull off what you are suggesting it would require a retool of one segment (and a small segment at that) of an entire industry. And the ultimate question is- to what purpose? Does it save money? Is it more efficient? Is it safer? What is the benefit to the industry to do things the way that you propose? (I will say here that I know just enough about electricity to be dangerous, and you obviously know much more than I, but these are the thoughts one lay person has. And I will warn you that if your response gets overly technical my eyes are going to glaze over.)
  9. While you might get a better response on the Carnival forum I believe promo codes for this are limited to targeted cruisers. I did not get one for our last sailing, but our son did.
  10. Just got back from Mardi Gras and while we haven't sailed Oasis we have sailed Anthem of the Seas and I thought that Mardi Gras was good competition for Anthem. Anthem had the bumper cars/roller skating, Mardi Gras Bolt and the ropes course. Anthem the Solarium, Mardi Gras Serenity (with a salad bar instead of a bistro). Anthem the Dog House, Mardi Gras Big Chicken and Street Eats and Guys and Blue Iguana. Anthem 270, Mardi Gras Center Stage. The only tip is go with the flow and have a great time- Carnival and Royal aren't as far apart in the product they offer as many think. Here's a link to my review. https://boards.cruisecritic.com/topic/3005559-mardi-gras-420-to-427/#comment-67313447
  11. They had digital options on Mardi Gras but it costs the same as a print. I would second doing different poses for the regular photographers. If you got the digital only one person would have to buy them, then have them printed when you got home (just make sure you get a release to do that).
  12. Possibly but you didn't allude to that in your post but I can now see where you're coming from.
  13. Actually he was investigated for his actions because every pilot is investigated for their actions when something goes wrong. And the computer models (and simulations) were correct- an immediate turn back toward the airport would have resulted in a landing on the ground (and even still the pilots in the simulators needed to practice the maneuver before they were successful). But as was pointed out (by Sully and others) no one had ever trained for dual engine loss at such a low altitude. I would think that since that fateful day this scenario is carried out in simulators regularly so pilots can be trained in this unlikely occurrence.
×
×
  • Create New...