Jump to content

North West Newbie

Members
  • Posts

    421
  • Joined

Posts posted by North West Newbie

  1. 2 hours ago, newjoisey said:

    i know what i call a british breakfast with hot dogs n beans.........and it aint complimentary 

     

    Perhaps, an American breakfast?

     

    Certainly the English Breakfasts I have been served aboard a Cunard ship have never included a hotdog. For clarity see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_dog. An American breakfast may well include a hotdog but being British I’m not qualified to say.

     

  2. 3 hours ago, ExArkie said:

    But if we all go in together...US$16M divided by 1076 passenger capacity is ONLY about US$15k per person.

     

    And, if that methodology is extended to a timeshare model, it averages out at around US$286 a week which is a little under US$41 per person per night. Any takers?

  3. 1 minute ago, Host Hattie said:

    If employees are furloughed they are not allowed to perform any work for their employer.

     

    HH, you beat me to it.

     

    Also, as announced the Chancellor today,  wef August the furlough scheme will become more flexible to allow a phased return to work.

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Austcruiser84 said:

     

    Equating passengers with cargo like mail isn't a just comparison. Facts established are majority of passengers are destined for southern parts of UK and Europe. Southampton is closer to Heathrow, London and all the rail link to Europe. Why would a person travel an extra hour when it wasn't necessary? When someone flies, do they choose an airport that is less convenient for their travel purposes? I'd wager not.

     

    Once again keeping my comment in context, the reference to passenger/cargo was specifically in respect of the ship’s ability to navigate its way from Liverpool and around Ireland.

     

    Irrespective, the fact remains that transportation links in the North West of England allow anyone wishing to explore any part of the UK with relative ease.

  5. 23 minutes ago, tacticalbanjo said:

     

    Anyone wanting to do a chargeback should be aware that companies can and do blacklist customers for doing just that. It might be your legal right to do so but the company has the legal right not to do further business with you.

     

    I would only ask for a chargeback if I was absolutely sure that I never wanted to cruise with a Carnival Corp brand again.

     

    Really?

  6. 8 hours ago, Austcruiser84 said:

     

    Except in the early days of Samuel Cunard, transporting mail was the priority. The new railways meant easy national transportation and Liverpool was ideally situated. It wasn't about passengers, who certainly were not holidaying in the 1840s.  

     

    Southampton today remains the logical, economical choice for the holidaying purpose these ships serve. 

     

    The context of my comment was in response to navybankteacher who said Hard to say getting around Ireland.....” The ability to navigate from Liverpool [and get around Ireland] is unaffected by the ship’s passenger/cargo load.

     

    As you rightly say The new railways meant easy national transportation and Liverpool was ideally situated. That is truer today as rail links across the UK have vastly improved since the 19th century. Therefore, Liverpool remains ideally situated for anyone holidaying who wishes to visit anywhere in the UK.

     

    • Like 1
  7. 14 minutes ago, navybankerteacher said:

    But many more US types would prefer to bookend a cruise with a stay in London than in the Midlands.  Hard to say getting around Ireland would be better than directly into the Channel for going  to New York — and certainly Med, most other European destinations and southern climes generally argue for Southampton.  

     

    Liverpool is not in the Midlands and there are plenty of other options for the "US types" to visit in or from our locality. Plus London is only 2 hours away by train if they don't fancy a change. Samuel Cunard had no problem navigating his way from Liverpool to Halifax in 1840.

    • Like 1
  8. 1 hour ago, kentchris said:

    Not very attractive for US pax travelling to/from TAs though - Southampton is much better placed being comparatively close to Heathrow.

     

    Manchester Airport serves the US very well and it is closer to Liverpool than Southampton is to Heathrow.

    • Like 1
  9. 9 minutes ago, rafinmd said:

    Queen Mary 2 approaching Tenerife and looks like she might be holding for a pilot.  I hope this is a refueling stop and not a medical emergency, although Captain Hashmi had it said requests for medical assistance would likely be refused.

     

    Roy

     

    According to bluemarble on the other thread, QM2 is calling at Tenerife to disembark some guests who reside there. 

    • Thanks 1
  10. 48 minutes ago, Windsurfboy said:

    The US CDC has issue a level 3 alert, avoid all unnecessary travel to China. That's a serious response

     

    Will UK follow  suit

     

    Will this include Hong Kong 

     

    Yes. The Foreign Office has just updated its advice to warn against all but essential travel to mainland China following the coronavirus outbreak.

  11. 4 minutes ago, pully8 said:

    thanks for your reply.

    is there more room for luggage in 1st?

     

    Other than the overhead luggage racks, which are not suitable for large cases, there is no designated luggage space. Cases end up either on spare seats and/or in the vestibules.

  12. 18 minutes ago, Windsurfboy said:

    I will be behind everyone knowing my luck, try and get there before 12am.

     

    If you arrive at 12am, you will find the terminal in darkness but at least be the very first in the queue!😁

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...