sweby Posted September 29, 2014 #1 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Anyone got any ideas on this? The cruises out of the UK always seemed to sell out without major price cuts. Maybe in 2016 Thomson could do new cruises to France and Spain from the UK and alternate with the favourites to Baltics, Iceland and Norway. Also I am still waiting for them to get a ship in the far east, sailing out of Singapore or Thailand. I am sure I'm not the only one. Sweby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheila49 Posted September 29, 2014 #2 Share Posted September 29, 2014 I understood it was due to their ships not meeting new regulations on engine emissions and/or port docking charges becoming more expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kruzseeka Posted September 29, 2014 #3 Share Posted September 29, 2014 (edited) I understood it was due to their ships not meeting new regulations on engine emissions and/or port docking charges becoming more expensive. I believe this is the case too. Here is an extract from an article which highlights the economic impact (and pointing out the adverse impact on the industry and knock-on side effects - written from the industry point of view, but I think their case is lost - it's happening): The economic impact will be massive – increasing the cost of bunker fuel by, potentially, 87% for ships operating in Emission Control Areas (ECAs). This will mean, from 2015, up to £3.6bn additional annual cost for shipping within 200 miles of the UK. The energy required to refine the fuel that shipping will use in the European ECAs alone will add 12 million tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year. This will include reduced shipping activity in ECAs, affecting ports and road infrastructure, and causing job losses. A recent UK study concluded that as many as 2000 jobs will be lost. The cruise industry will lose tourism and port revenues. The ferry industry will see closure of longer routes and price increases, which will encourage a shift of passengers, who will not want to travel long distance to the shorter ferry crossings, to less environmentally air travel. Both will lose investment and jobs. When we had the Q&A with Fraser, I asked the question about how this might affect Thomson's operation from the UK as I'd just heard an item on our local news about the devastating effect it is likely to make on P&O's ferry services along the South Coast. Fraser replied on the lines of he could see why it would have a huge impact on P&O ferries but didn't see it affecting Thomson. Now I can only square that answer with 'P&O ferries are stuck in that region for their ferrries across the Channel - we can move out of the UK'. Otherwise it would seriously affect them in terms of swingeing additional fuel levies too making routes to Scandinavia, Baltics and round the UK less profitable if not no longer commercially viable. Thomson are affected more than other cruise lines because of the age of their ships (less efficient engines, dependency on fuel with higher pollution issues?). The big question is when regulations tighten further from 2020, I believe it is, what are they going to do then? New ships? We wish! ;) Edited September 29, 2014 by kruzseeka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kruzseeka Posted September 29, 2014 #4 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Found the link. It was Kalos who asked the question but quoted another post of mine - about Brittany Ferries not P&O although their routes will be badly affected too. I think in hindsight, Fraser said it all. Cruise ships can move around!! I.e. move away from the UK! I can't see Thomson back with ex-UK any time soon. :( http://boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=1738979 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweby Posted September 29, 2014 Author #5 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Thanks for explain that, now I understand the logic behind the decision to move out of the UK. I hope they look to get new ships in future. I think this is the way forward for them. After all, they have invested in new hotels. As more and more people look to other cruise lines, I think they need to take the plunge and invest in new, or they will be squeezed out altogether. Sweby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kruzseeka Posted September 29, 2014 #6 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Thanks for explain that, now I understand the logic behind the decision to move out of the UK. I hope they look to get new ships in future. I think this is the way forward for them. After all, they have invested in new hotels. As more and more people look to other cruise lines, I think they need to take the plunge and invest in new, or they will be squeezed out altogether.Sweby I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeholiday2 Posted September 29, 2014 #7 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Aside from the fuel regs issue, Thomson have planes and Hotel beds to fill. I think their strategy is to grow the cruise and stay market, they have a good infrastructure already in place to do this. Much better than any other cruise line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtt Posted September 29, 2014 #8 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Also they aren't going to spend money updating engines on ships thatthey only lease when 2 are only leased til 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRUISIN LINDA Posted September 29, 2014 #9 Share Posted September 29, 2014 I agree with Joe and Michelle. Some of Fred's ships are older than Thomson :eek: but they own their ships. It is the same difference as renting or buying your house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kruzseeka Posted September 29, 2014 #10 Share Posted September 29, 2014 I agree with Joe and Michelle. Some of Fred's ships are older than Thomson :eek: but they own their ships. It is the same difference as renting or buying your house. All comes back to the investment Thomson are prepared to make in the UK market. Sadly, it seems not a lot, certainly as compared with their competitors! :rolleyes: It may all come home to roost in 2020! :eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happy v Posted September 29, 2014 #11 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Of course all this could have a rather favourable outcome in that we may get to Thailand :rolleyes: I doubt their pollution laws will be as strict. I think I'm as upset as anyone over the lack of northern port cruises. I do however agree with trying to control the emissions especially with the number of cruise ships now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geomagot Posted September 29, 2014 #12 Share Posted September 29, 2014 All comes back to the investment Thomson are prepared to make in the UK market. Sadly, it seems not a lot, certainly as compared with their competitors! :rolleyes: It may all come home to roost in 2020! :eek: we will all be cruising on virgin galactic by the time thoms upgrade their fleet::rolleyes::D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malch_uk Posted September 29, 2014 #13 Share Posted September 29, 2014 I agree with Joe and Michelle. Some of Fred's ships are older than Thomson :eek: but they own their ships. It is the same difference as renting or buying your house. And Fred aren't pulling out of UK sailings next year - I've just been looking at their brochure for ideas. Thomson did miss a year or two of UK sailings a few years ago but soon came back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kruzseeka Posted September 29, 2014 #14 Share Posted September 29, 2014 And Fred aren't pulling out of UK sailings next year - I've just been looking at their brochure for ideas. Thomson did miss a year or two of UK sailings a few years ago but soon came back. Better profit margins or prepared to pay the extra tax do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtt Posted September 30, 2014 #15 Share Posted September 30, 2014 fred are more known for uk cruises though, and they will no doubt spend money on their ships rather than loose their customers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now