Jump to content

A BIG BIG BIGGEST ship Not Princess thankfully


FredS

Recommended Posts

Aker Yards, the Norwegian shipbuilder, has won a new cruise ship order worth about €900m ($1.1bn) from Royal Caribbean International. The vessel to be built is the most valuable ship ever ordered in the history of commercial shipbuilding, the company said.

 

The 220,000-gross-registered-ton new vessel will be 360 metres long and carry 5,400 passengers, making it more than 40 per cent bigger than the world's biggest cruise ship now under construction for Royal Caribbean by Aker Yards in Finland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admittedly I'm a mega-ship fan (Grand class), but this is going in the category of "absurd". Just the logistics of it -- embark/disembark, tendering, being on a ship with THAT many people!?!? Could you imagine being on another ship and seeing that one pull in behind you in port? Think about it -- that is bigger than the Sapphire AND Diamond slapped together.

Someday the consumer will say enough is enough. QM2 is a masterpiece. Freedom of the Seas is simply a response. It's all about the title.

I say "WHATEVER!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a bit more info:

 

Royal Caribbean Orders 220,000 Ton Ship!

Royal Caribbean has announced it will build cruising's biggest ship ever with the development of a 220,000 ton, 5,400 passenger ship. To be developed under the project name Genesis, the first ship is planned for delivery in fall of 2009.

1,180 feet long, 154 feet wide and 240 feet high

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No -- this kind of ship won't suit everyone's fancy. I don't think they're trying to do that at Royal Carib. They *are* trying to be innovative, and the "biggest" and "coolest" ship at sea. I'm sure they are considering the logistics of loading (and unloading) 5400 passengers, and all the food, luggage, etc., and other logistics involved with the process. Perhaps they'll do a dual terminal with certain pax go to one building, and others to another, making it more like 2700 pax to deal with at a time, with separate entry dockways for each.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No -- this kind of ship won't suit everyone's fancy. I don't think they're trying to do that at Royal Carib. They *are* trying to be innovative, and the "biggest" and "coolest" ship at sea. I'm sure they are considering the logistics of loading (and unloading) 5400 passengers, and all the food, luggage, etc., and other logistics involved with the process. Perhaps they'll do a dual terminal with certain pax go to one building, and others to another, making it more like 2700 pax to deal with at a time, with separate entry dockways for each.

 

Hucc, I think that you have it down with the embarkation and debarkation of a ship that size. The cruise lines have thought this out before building something of this size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We I for one think that its a great idea. Variety and choice is a good thing, not a bad thing IMHO

While a ship this big may not appeal to many, it will to some. It wasn’t that long ago that the thought of a 100,000 ton ship was unheard of. Now it’s about the standard for the major players.

If they build them big enough the bow will be at the destination while the stern still rests at the departure point!

Bring it on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, RCCL embarkation and disembarkation is no where near as efficient as Princess so I would think it'll be a nightmare to board/disembark.

 

That said, I wonder if they're considering adding snowboarding, ski jumping or water skiing to the list of activities onboard. Maybe bungee jumping for the real daredevils. :) Heck, they already have ice skating and surfing.

 

I sure wouldn't want to be in port at the same time as this ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, RCCL embarkation and disembarkation is no where near as efficient as Princess so I would think it'll be a nightmare to board/disembark.

 

That said, I wonder if they're considering adding snowboarding, ski jumping or water skiing to the list of activities onboard. Maybe bungee jumping for the real daredevils. :) Heck, they already have ice skating and surfing.

 

I sure wouldn't want to be in port at the same time as this ship.

 

I'm not sure if your last cruise with RCI was really in 1986 or not, but we sailed them last year and in 2003 and the process was very efficient. It probably depends on the departure port more than anything else. The Grand out of Galveston is a good example.

 

I want to sail on the Freedom, but not until the novelty wears off and the prices come down. Probably 2007 or 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if your last cruise with RCI was really in 1986 or not, but we sailed them last year and in 2003 and the process was very efficient. It probably depends on the departure port more than anything else. The Grand out of Galveston is a good example.
Our last cruise on RCI was a couple of years ago, on the Nordic Empress out of Tampa. We were the first in line with the check-in Rep and it still took us 15 minutes. We were on the Explorer of the Seas the year before that and it was horrible. We were there at check-in at 2:15PM but didn't board until almost 5PM due to the slow lines and crowds. At 4PM, they closed half the check-in windows. I couldn't believe it!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QM2 is already very big, but a beautifully built ship (with some design flaws though), but this is getting ridiculous.

 

However, I might still cruise on it once just to take a look at the ship out of curiosity . . . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I think the best choice of name is Wagonmaster Family Truckster of the Seas...maybe the ship could be the location for a "National Lampoon's Cruise Vacation" with the Griswalds.

 

That's going a little bit too far :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Princess were to commission a ship this size, it would certainly be good news for this board. We’ve already got threads about crowded pools, crowded buffets, inability to tender in a reasonable amount of time – a 5400 passenger ship is only going to magnify those problems and that type of Wal-Marting of the industry will mean lower quality. The cruise lines can barely process the number of people they have now on a 7-day cruise. And I doubt that this will mean more choice for anyone – the additional room on these ships will be used to house the additional 2000 passengers. Island will be overrun – think tendering in Grand Cayman is an issue now? – and ecosystems will not be able to handle the influx of people.

Great idea, RCI. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: A Touch of Magic on an Avalon Rhine River Cruise
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...

If you are already a Cruise Critic member, please log in with your existing account information or your email address and password.