lindajeff Posted September 7, 2006 #1 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Given that they are both "main" restaurants, I assume that the menus are identical. Any reason to go to one versus the other? Anyone actually go to both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwjax Posted September 7, 2006 #2 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Given that they are both "main" restaurants, I assume that the menus are identical. Any reason to go to one versus the other? Anyone actually go to both? Hopefully this won't double post, it didn't go through the first time I guess. We went to both the GP and Alizar. Menus are the same, the service was good to excellent in both, and so was the food. The big difference was the GP has window tables overlooking the fantail, and Alizar does not. Both have side window tables. Without my notes, I can't remember what we had, but will post that later or in my full review. JW:cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruiseandbeads Posted September 10, 2006 #3 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Given that they are both "main" restaurants, I assume that the menus are identical. Any reason to go to one versus the other? Anyone actually go to both? We went to both, the menus are identical. In our experience, Alizar had much quicker and service than the Grand Pacific. There seem to be lots of staff being trained at the Grand Pacific when we were there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.