DC2OC Posted July 18, 2007 #1 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Reports in the New London CT newspapers reports that starting in Sept 2007 that they will be replacing Newport RI on EOS cruises.Is this good/bad/no difference for the cruiser?WE are sailing 10/12...................Frank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reapfm Posted July 18, 2007 #2 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I like the idea of going to New London, CT. We have been to Newport on other cruises, and going to New London will be a new experience for us. Either port would be fine, however the fact that we don't have to tender in is much more appealing.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alphakitty Posted July 18, 2007 #3 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Personally, I would prefer Newport to New London. The town is much more picturesque and historical. There is more to do in Newport and getting around by foot and trolley bus is much easier than New London. JMO YMMV :=) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoofingPrincess Posted July 18, 2007 #4 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Report in our local paper was that the Explorer was stopping in New London on Sept 1, 15, 29 and Oct 13, and that it is scheduled to call there twice in July 2008. Didn't mention that it was replacing Newport (the focus was more on the fact that a ship was stopping in CT), so I wondered whether it was an extra stop or if it was replacing someplace else. RCCL website is not showing the New London stop yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lisas414 Posted July 18, 2007 #5 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I am on the July 2008 9 night eastern caribbean and bermuda cruise. I am from CT and I am hoping that they do not switch anything on this itinerary. I would not be happy about this one....unless it did boarding in New London. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerif Posted July 18, 2007 #6 Share Posted July 18, 2007 We're on the 8/31 voyage - already have an excursion booked in Newport, so if they're not stopping there, I hope we are advised soon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC2OC Posted July 18, 2007 Author #7 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Oct 13 is our scheduled stop in Newport so New London would be replacing Newport....................................Frank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Host Kewlguy Posted July 18, 2007 #8 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Have never been to New London but have been to Newport RI. It's a very interesting town with lots of history, wonderful Victorian architecture and plenty of activities. We enjoyed our day in Newport and would enjoy going back in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsscaptain Posted July 18, 2007 #9 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Have never been to New London but have been to Newport RI. It's a very interesting town with lots of history, wonderful Victorian architecture and plenty of activities. We enjoyed our day in Newport and would enjoy going back in the future. Well Tony when you do get back to Newport you call me! I'll take you on the real tour, and for a good REAL lobster dinner! I'm only 20 min away. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Host Kewlguy Posted July 19, 2007 #10 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Well Tony when you do get back to Newport you call me! I'll take you on the real tour, and for a good REAL lobster dinner! I'm only 20 min away. ;) Sounds good to me. Will do. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kathy130 Posted July 19, 2007 #11 Share Posted July 19, 2007 That certainly needs to be checked into further. I absolutely LOVE Newport, and for cruisers, IMHO, Newport would be the biggest draw. The ambiance of that quaint town makes it a favorite with many people. There is much to do there. Not that New London wouldn't be interesting, but comparing the two, Newport would win with me hands down. Will have to wait and see the reason. It could be because of tendering capacity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoofingPrincess Posted July 19, 2007 #12 Share Posted July 19, 2007 I suspect that the CT Tourism Board offered sufficient enducement for them to stop in New London. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixbirches Posted July 19, 2007 #13 Share Posted July 19, 2007 I heard this story on the news a couple of nights ago (I live in CT). They said New London was replacing Newport because they couldn't supply sufficient "water taxis" in Newport. Who knows if that is the real story, but I don't blame anyone for being disappointed. New London is desperately trying to sell itself as a cruise ship destination. Maasdam was there earlier in the spring, but thats pretty much it. Its not a terrible stop, but I would like Newport better, given a choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.