Gutenberg Posted September 25, 2008 #1 Share Posted September 25, 2008 Maybe I missed seeing a thread on here for this, but we received our cruise documents today for the Nov. 7 cruise on Noordam. Tucked in the back was a notice that the Hotel Service Charge will be raised from $10 per day per person to $11, beginning Oct 8, 2008. Is this old news to everyone else and just new news to me? I know the crew works very hard and the staff on HAL is superior, but if HAL feels they need a raise, why don't they take the money out of the fuel surcharge to pass onto them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMorris Posted September 25, 2008 #2 Share Posted September 25, 2008 Here you go... it fell to page 2... they just raised the charge. http://boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=848049 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimVrhovac Posted September 25, 2008 #3 Share Posted September 25, 2008 They earn it so no problems with us. We still tip above and beyond that anyway.. Ruth & Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazy Kruizers Posted September 25, 2008 #4 Share Posted September 25, 2008 The fuel surchage is to pay for the fuel. REMEMBER -- HAL has signed a contract to buy fuel -- they cannot break that contract. I don't know when the lastest contract ends -- but HAL is stuck paying the price that was agreed upon. As far I am concerned -- the crew earns those few extra pennies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gutenberg Posted September 25, 2008 Author #5 Share Posted September 25, 2008 Ruth and Jim, I love your cruise itinerary. I only wish I was retired to have the time to build one like that. I talked to a travel agent and asked her when she thought the fuel surcharge would be dropped and her response was "Never". She thought it was the cruise industry's way of getting more money on the top without having to give the travel agents a percentage. Apparently there seemed to be some bitterness among the agents about this whole fuel surcharge issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Williebill Posted September 26, 2008 #6 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Everyone charges a fuel surcharge now; it's just the way business is done. As far as an extra dollar for good service, I'll pay it and more! Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruce-r Posted September 26, 2008 #7 Share Posted September 26, 2008 I know the crew works very hard and the staff on HAL is superior, but if HAL feels they need a raise, why don't they take the money out of the fuel surcharge to pass onto them? Isn't the fuel surcharge meant to pay for the fuel? :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMorris Posted September 26, 2008 #8 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Isn't the fuel surcharge meant to pay for the fuel? :confused: I thought it was... does someone know something I don't? :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 26, 2008 #9 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Imagine that........ a whole $7 more per week. Hope they don't spend that extra dollar all in one place!~ :rolleyes: :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazy Kruizers Posted September 26, 2008 #10 Share Posted September 26, 2008 About 6 weeks ago we had to have some work done at the house. At the bottom of the bills -- there was a fuel surcharge for coming out to the house!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMorris Posted September 26, 2008 #11 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Alot of companies are adding a fuel charge to the bill. Our shredding company just came to pick up our recycleables and on the bottom of the invoice was a $3 fuel charge. It is the sign of the times for now unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowPrincess Posted September 26, 2008 #12 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Yup, I'm just doing up a notice to my clients that I have to raise prices because of fuel costs :( Hate to do it, but can't afford to stay in business if I can't recover the increased costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mary Ellen Posted September 26, 2008 #13 Share Posted September 26, 2008 I know the crew works very hard and the staff on HAL is superior, but if HAL feels they need a raise, why don't they take the money out of the fuel surcharge to pass onto them?Lets see, the actual increased costs to the cruise lines was about 10X the fuel supplement passed on to the passengers. With this logic, the crew would owe HAL. :eek: Sorry, this won't fly (or sail ;) ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 26, 2008 #14 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Lets see, the actual increased costs to the cruise lines was about 10X the fuel supplement passed on to the passengers. With this logic, the crew would owe HAL. :eek: Sorry, this won't fly (or sail ;) ) Huh :confused: I don't understand what you are saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaBear67 Posted September 26, 2008 #15 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Yup, I'm just doing up a notice to my clients that I have to raise prices because of fuel costs :( Hate to do it, but can't afford to stay in business if I can't recover the increased costs. I think I'm gonna charge my boss a fuel surcharge for having me come in to work.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mary Ellen Posted September 26, 2008 #16 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Huh :confused: I don't understand what you are saying. They (the op) want the 'extra' tips to come out of the fuel surcharge. HAL is in the hole with the fuel surcharge (as they only passed on 1/10th of the additional costs). There isn't any 'extra' money in the fuel surcharge fund. Thus, following that 'logic' the crew would owe HAL. :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 26, 2008 #17 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Thanks. See what you are saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh0906 Posted September 26, 2008 #18 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Lets see, the actual increased costs to the cruise lines was about 10X the fuel supplement passed on to the passengers. With this logic, the crew would owe HAL. :eek: Sorry, this won't fly (or sail ;) ) Mary Ellen, I believe that most folks believe as you do. First, Cruise ships run on the lowest grade oil that is left over after everything of value can be distilled from a barrel. Top dollar for that oil reached the $36 area per barrel in July of 2008. NOT $136.00 but only $36.00. Folks often complain of soot on their balconies in the aft section, a sympton of the use of that low grade fuel. It is my thought that when all things are known, that CCL Corporate is doing just dandy, and pushing lots of costs forward as fast as they can to maintain that fuel surcharge. Kind of like the trim packages sold on new cars, added dealer markup. If they ran the USED oil out of the deep fat fryers, it would be an improvement in quality. Islands in Hawaii are starting to complain about the volume of cruise ships that they are seeing for the above reason. Every day there is one in port, it is like having an belching power plant move in next door. Hugh in Dallas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ekerr19 Posted September 26, 2008 #19 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Even Fed Ex charges a fuel surcharge. The crew deserve the extra buck - which is split a kazillion ways - no doubt. I wouldn't mind seeing them raise it to $20 per person, per day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 26, 2008 #20 Share Posted September 26, 2008 Like you, 'ekerr'........ we always leave extra envelopes anyway. If they want to make the automatic hotel service charge higher, fine with us. Those crews deserve adequate thanks!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.