atthebar Posted March 2, 2005 #26 Share Posted March 2, 2005 GOOD! Should have happened a long time ago. At least NCL won't rip-off people on this old tub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Globaliser Posted March 2, 2005 #27 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Gone to the scrap heap!I suspect you misunderstand. The latest news is at least a month's reprieve, and the French government possibly getting its act together to save her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atthebar Posted March 4, 2005 #28 Share Posted March 4, 2005 :) NORWAY Readied For Removal February 25: The latest reports indicate that if NORWAY (ex FRANCE) is not sold for $20 Million USD by Monday, 28 February, she will, indeed, go for scrap. Meanwhile, at Bremerhaven, where NORWAY has sat for over two years, fittings are being removed and transfered to containers. Some reports indicate there may be an auction and others suggest these fittings may well be incorporated into a rebuilt UNITED STATES or INDEPENDENCE, or both. As her sale for scrapping seems imminent, it now must be decided whether the ship will be towed via the expensive Suez Canal or the long, somewhat risky route around Africa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoreguy Posted March 4, 2005 #29 Share Posted March 4, 2005 According to "LE FIGARO" a French daily newspaper, Norway was sold on Tuesday to an Indian scrap merchant for 15 million euros. From the first farewell cruise Sept. 2001. I would gladly give up the Norway if the Towers were still in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lizf Posted March 4, 2005 #30 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Shoreguy- Were you on that Farewell sailing? My husband and I were and we were by the Trade Towers on the 6th of Sept, I believe, then headed out and were in the middle of the Atlantic when the announcement came over the TVs. The rest of that cruise was a real downer, of course. I hate to see the Norway end up like this, but I agree wholeheartedly with you on the trade towers. Liz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoreguy Posted March 4, 2005 #31 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Shoreguy- Were you on that Farewell sailing? My husband and I were and we were by the Trade Towers on the 6th of Sept, I believe, then headed out and were in the middle of the Atlantic when the announcement came over the TVs. The rest of that cruise was a real downer, of course.I hate to see the Norway end up like this, but I agree wholeheartedly with you on the trade towers. Liz Liz I was not but if you have not seen it the link below will take you to a great travel log from that cruise. Just click on the link at the bottom of the In Memoriam page. http://www.thewaywewent.com/norway.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Globaliser Posted March 17, 2005 #32 Share Posted March 17, 2005 FWIW, I offer this, apparently from LinersList:- Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:39 am Subject: Norway and United States. At NCL's Seatrade press conference today, Colin Veitch had several interesting comments on the future of these two ships. Re Norway, he indicated there were three possibilities: a future in Star Cruises; sale for further service;and scrap. He stated that there was no deadline for this decision, but that he wanted to get the vessel off NCL's books in a few weeks. Regarding the explosion, he stressed that they still don't know what caused the boiler to explode, perhaps from causes still latent in the ship's remaining boilers. The future of the United States depends on whether NCL America finds it possible to make adequately profitable operation with an American crew; whether the ship can be made to meet the new IMO stability standards; and the economic viability of the vessel rebuilt as a cruise ship. He seemed enthusiastic and quite positive about the prospect of having the ship back in service, but stressed that it all depended on these factors. Next year, the ship will probably be moved to an as-yet unselected shipyard for drydocking and further inspection. Economic studies on the viability of the ship's operation (as many of you know) are now in progress. The route would not be in Hawaiian waters, but on a variety of other services. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kalamari Posted March 18, 2005 #33 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Photos were taken in October 2000, wow, what memories (and especially of the towel closet!) :) Menina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeymars Posted March 18, 2005 #34 Share Posted March 18, 2005 "He stated that there was no deadline for this decision, but that he wanted to get the vessel off NCL's books in a few weeks." Is it just me, or is this politely called "talking out of both sides of your mouth?" No deadline to decide the fate of the ship, but stating he wants it "off his hands" within "a few weeks!??" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoreguy Posted March 18, 2005 #35 Share Posted March 18, 2005 "He stated that there was no deadline for this decision, but that he wanted to get the vessel off NCL's books in a few weeks." Is it just me, or is this politely called "talking out of both sides of your mouth?" No deadline to decide the fate of the ship, but stating he wants it "off his hands" within "a few weeks!??" Not exactly - They could transfer the burden to the parent company (Star) the expense is still there but not on his books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeymars Posted March 18, 2005 #36 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Not exactly - They could transfer the burden to the parent company (Star) the expense is still there but not on his books. Granted, but those of us in the financial community see behind that sort of shell game and would still be pressuring the "enterprise" to do something to stop the expenses surrounding a non-productive asset. Or stated differently, a balance sheet shuffle doesn't lower the possibility that this classic vessel is increasingly at risk for destruction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoreguy Posted March 18, 2005 #37 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Granted, but those of us in the financial community see behind that sort of shell game and would still be pressuring the "enterprise" to do something to stop the expenses surrounding a non-productive asset. Or stated differently, a balance sheet shuffle doesn't lower the possibility that this classic vessel is increasingly at risk for destruction. Don't get me wrong my bet the ship will be in pieces on a beach in India. Colin wants it off his watch and his results for NCL. The pressure is still on it is just not his problem anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smeyer418 Posted March 19, 2005 #38 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Doesn't sound good. http://www.cnn.com/2005/TRAVEL/03/16/queen.mary.reut/index.html If the QM can't make it can the Norway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rman738 Posted March 19, 2005 #39 Share Posted March 19, 2005 We were supposed to cruise on the Norway in early June of 2003, a week after the tragedy. Our disappointment was second to the sorrow of losing those crew members that perished. It seems doubtful that the Norway or the SS United States will ever sail again. Each of us mortals meets the end of our days sooner or later. That end will probably be the same for these two great ships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.