Jump to content

Fuel Charge Increase


LeGerri

Recommended Posts

Paying more for stuff stinks, no doubt. But I feel that I can't blame the cruiselines for implementing this surcharge. Oil is out of control and the cost of it is affecting EVERYTHING.

 

I've seen a few threads with discussions on people that are cutting back on their vacationing because the economy has knocked their socks off. The cruiselines have all these MASSIVE ships either in the planning stage or already started construction on them.....I wonder how smart this is?????

 

I know not everyone is affected by this downslide in the economy as badly as others might be...but I'm curious to see how big an effect this is going to make on the cruise industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must be the only one who likes the cost broken down.

I like to see the actual fare, the port fees and the tax all seperate and having the fuel charge on it's own doesn't bother me at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must be the only one who likes the cost broken down.

I like to see the actual fare, the port fees and the tax all seperate and having the fuel charge on it's own doesn't bother me at all.

you separate the fuel surcharge so that your guests know why their fare is higher. If prices just go up, people complain at the cruise line's greed, but if we see a fuel surcharge, and we all know gas prices are out of control, we are more likely to blame our government or greedy oil companies, etc--not Carnival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must be the only one who likes the cost broken down.

I like to see the actual fare, the port fees and the tax all seperate and having the fuel charge on it's own doesn't bother me at all.

 

I agree that way if oil ever does back off we can see if the cruiselines follow suit and back the surcharges down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In general, fuel surcharges will apply from what is in effect at the time of booking. Retroactive increases will not be allowed, at least that's the way it working out so far after court challenges.

 

There never has been a court challenge, there have on the other hand been negotiated settlements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There never has been a court challenge, there have on the other hand been negotiated settlements.

no court challenges but it's been insinuated that if the cruiselines did not back down, they might end up with class action lawsuits. I would imagine the bigger risk was ticking off your guests, though, by adding surcharges that did not exist at the time of booking. With the economy the way it is, the last thing a cruiseline wants to do is alienate its frequent guests, who are the ones most likely to even take note of the fuel surcharge issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know nothing about ships...I do know that having a large car means burning more fuel than having a small one. I assume that having a larger ship means burning excessively more fuel. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

 

I saw a link on the RCI boards yesterday about a Princess ship in the works that is 450,000 gross tons. :rolleyes:

 

I don't get it.

(here is the link )

http://www.princesskaguya.com/

 

 

I don't blame the cruiselines for implementing a fuel surcharge given todays' economy...but I have to wonder what idiots are comign up with these out-of-control sized ships during this time of economical disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

old news

 

Well, if you consider yesterday old news. I booked last week and paid only $5.00 per day. My booking on CCL's website still shows $5.00 per day so I guess they aren't going to apply this increase to existing bookings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you have to balance the extra fuel use with the number of guests that the ships hold. I don't know any numbers, but they may still make more money on the larger ships despite the extra fuel. Cruiselines are also beginning to change itineraries so there are more port days and fewer at sea days, further saving money on fuel. Further, they try to place ports closer together, so the ships can travel slower and save more on fuel (thus the new interest in having ships depart directly from islands in the Caribbean--ships don't have to travel from FL to the Caribbean, which typically takes a full day, and you can tell your guests that if they are on these itineraries, their Caribbean vacation has begun the moment they get off the plane. I would imagine we will see fewer and fewer of the cruises from NYC to the Caribbean, and we have already seen huge increases in the fares to depart from NYC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if you consider yesterday old news. I booked last week and paid only $5.00 per day. My booking on CCL's website still shows $5.00 per day so I guess they aren't going to apply this increase to existing bookings.

if you read the press release, it was released April 7, 2008. That is when it was being discussed here, two weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you have to balance the extra fuel use with the number of guests that the ships hold. I don't know any numbers, but they may still make more money on the larger ships despite the extra fuel. Cruiselines are also beginning to change itineraries so there are more port days and fewer at sea days, further saving money on fuel. Further, they try to place ports closer together, so the ships can travel slower and save more on fuel (thus the new interest in having ships depart directly from islands in the Caribbean--ships don't have to travel from FL to the Caribbean, which typically takes a full day, and you can tell your guests that if they are on these itineraries, their Caribbean vacation has begun the moment they get off the plane. I would imagine we will see fewer and fewer of the cruises from NYC to the Caribbean, and we have already seen huge increases in the fares to depart from NYC.

 

That makes sense 'on paper' for the cruiselines ONLY if people will still sail. Cost of flights to the Caribbean may dissuade people from booking cruises that leave from there. Many people have already stated that they will only be able to cruise if they can now drive to the port of embark, because air, especially for families is just costing way too much.

Unless the lines are planning on filling the ships with native islanders, they may be making a mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking for the press release but unable to find it on either CCL or Carnival Corp's websites. I wanted to confirm/verify that the increase was not going to be applied to existing bookings. If anyone has a link to the press release, please post so we will have the most accurate information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...

If you are already a Cruise Critic member, please log in with your existing account information or your email address and password.