Scotty G Posted April 17, 2014 #1 Share Posted April 17, 2014 http://www.seatrade-insider.com/news/news-headlines/which-brands-do-us-affluent-cruise-with-most-answer-may-surprise.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare A&L_Ont Posted April 17, 2014 #2 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Very interesting, not what I expected to read in placement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunkissed Mommy Posted April 17, 2014 #3 Share Posted April 17, 2014 I was also surprised by this. I would have expected to see some of the luxury lines rather than Royal and especially Carnival! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
time4u2go Posted April 17, 2014 #4 Share Posted April 17, 2014 I think the numbers might be skewed by the fact that there is simply a lot more capacity among the mass market lines than there is among the luxury lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyriecat Posted April 17, 2014 #5 Share Posted April 17, 2014 I can't really say that I'm surprised by the numbers. In reality, a $260K combined income isn't that "affluent." I bet if they used a starting income of $1M instead, the cruiseline choices would be different. My husband and I are not "affluent" but with some saving, we managed to take a Silversea cruise earlier this year. The itinerary was FABULOUS!!!!! and not offered by any of the "mass market" lines, which was why we picked Silversea for that particular cruise. It was fairly obvious that many of the passengers onboard were, in the words of comedian Ron White, "l-o-o-o-a-d-d-d-e-d!" There was at least one couple who made it a point to say they would never sail on a mass market cruiseline and snubbed my husband and I for being "mass market" cruisers (or in their words "filthy people"). While we greatly enjoyed the Silversea cruise experience, if a similar itinerary were offered by one of the mass market lines, I would have been fine sailing on a different cruiseline, most likely for considerably less money. The service on Silversea was exceptional, drinks were included, and overall, the food was better than mass market lines. The cabin itself was actually smaller than I have had on some of the mass market lines. I really don't think that the "luxury" experience was enough to justify the high fare, particularly since my husband and I aren't heavy drinkers, so I'll keep sailing the mass market lines with an occasional "luxury" line for a "once-in-a-lifetime" itinerary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runner2013 Posted April 17, 2014 #6 Share Posted April 17, 2014 I'm a bit surprised as well, but I agree it may be the accessibility of the mass market ships and where they go that draws people in. Sure, it would be nice to be on an 'uber rich' ship but since I'm only a blue collar worker i'll take Royal every time:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BamaGuy44 Posted April 17, 2014 #7 Share Posted April 17, 2014 I can't really say that I'm surprised by the numbers. In reality, a $260K combined income isn't that "affluent." I bet if they used a starting income of $1M instead, the cruiseline choices would be different. At 260K someone doesn't have a mansion full of servants, but that is still in the top 2% of US household incomes. There's no hard definition but most would consider more income than 98% of the US pretty affluent. (Maybe not in Manhattan or San Francisco) At that level someone's choice of cruise line would be pretty wide open, within reason. It's human nature not to think of ourselves as "rich", as most people try to be humble about their income. Usually they define rich as "someone who has a LOT more money than me" :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dz9yvr Posted April 17, 2014 #8 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Expect the cost cutting to continue. RCCL will see this as confirmation that the reduction in benefits and services doesn't matter to the passengers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Folk Singer Posted April 17, 2014 #9 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Very interesting, not what I expected to read in placement. agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksawyercruiser Posted April 17, 2014 #10 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Usually they define rich as "someone who has a LOT more money than me" :D This made me giggle as another CCer today on a different thread said that they defined "elderly" as anyone 10+ years older than them. It's all about perspective. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saurian Posted April 17, 2014 #11 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Not surprised. Most folks with this kind of income got there by living wisely and within their means. They do not drive expensive new cars, don't have debt, work very hard, and may not see the point of paying so much more for the same vacation. buying expensive cars is investing money in something that is going down in value, at an alarming rate, and a vacation is just that, a vacation. If one can unwind and recharge the same amount, if not with more peace of mind, on a cruise line that is cheaper, why not save the money and invest it in the market or in real estate, thus increasing their net worth. The richest people dont have anything to prove, only those who are dreaming of being rich do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now