Jump to content

Department of Homeland Security


qsuzi
 Share

Recommended Posts

Government employees fall into a different category here in the US. They can be in essence forced to come to work even if they are not being paid on time. Failure to show up for work could lead to dismissal though admittedly that's an extreme situation. While some government employees are covered by union negotiated "contracts" these contracts are not quite the same as a totally private corporation and its contracts with its employees.

 

Isn't forcing someone to work without financial compensation tantamount to slavery? In very the least, it sounds like indentured servitude. It's bad enough that when non-essential government employees are furloughed they are not allowed to find supplemental work in order to "make ends meet." But, apart from the immediacy of war or natural disaster, to force people to actually work without the promise of any compensation at all is highly unethical. And especially-so when those who are issuing the orders that are forcing others to work are, themselves, continuing to be paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't forcing someone to work without financial compensation tantamount to slavery? In very the least, it sounds like indentured servitude. It's bad enough that when non-essential government employees are furloughed they are not allowed to find supplemental work in order to "make ends meet." But, apart from the immediacy of war or natural disaster, to force people to actually work without the promise of any compensation at all is highly unethical. And especially-so when those who are issuing the orders that are forcing others to work are, themselves, continuing to be paid.

 

It's a mess for sure. In reality "forcing" Federal civil servants to work without immediate compensation is not quite as prevalent as the present DHS situation would imply. It also involves a rather complex and admittedly confusing set of rules and regulations that quite frankly are too long and probably not appropriate for discussion here as they have little bearing on cruising.

Edited by Randyk47
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, both of you.

I wonder how many more circus acts we can witness between now and then? :rolleyes:

 

In terms of immediate or significant impact on cruising, including such mundane aspects like flying, there shouldn't be anything until late this year. Other circus acts.....who knows? :rolleyes::eek::D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of immediate or significant impact on cruising, including such mundane aspects like flying, there shouldn't be anything until late this year. Other circus acts.....who knows? :rolleyes::eek::D

 

Considering the umbers of clowns involved on both sides of the aisle ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...

If you are already a Cruise Critic member, please log in with your existing account information or your email address and password.