flamedic Posted November 13, 2006 #1 Share Posted November 13, 2006 I have seen mention of this on another board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bepsf Posted November 13, 2006 #2 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Among other things that have little or nothing to do with cruising... The Jones Act (aka Merchant Marine Act) is a United States Federal statute that requires U.S.-flagged vessels to be built in the United States, owned by U.S. citizens, and documented under the laws of the United States. Documented means "registered, enrolled, or licensed under the laws of the United States." In addition, all officers and 75% of the crew must be U.S. citizens. Vessels that satisfy these requirements comprise the "Jones Act fleet". The Jones Act restricts the carriage of goods between United States ports to United States flagged vessels. The Passenger Services Act is a piece of United States legislation which came into force in 1886 relating to cabotage. Essentially, it says: "No foreign vessels shall transport passengers between ports or places in the United States, either directly or by way of a foreign port, under a penalty of $300 for each passenger so transported and landed." Any vessel subject to the Jones Act counts as a US vessel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fcorey Posted November 13, 2006 #3 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Among other things that have little or nothing to do with cruising... The Jones Act (aka Merchant Marine Act) is a United States Federal statute that requires U.S.-flagged vessels to be built in the United States, owned by U.S. citizens, and documented under the laws of the United States. Documented means "registered, enrolled, or licensed under the laws of the United States." In addition, all officers and 75% of the crew must be U.S. citizens. Vessels that satisfy these requirements comprise the "Jones Act fleet". The Jones Act restricts the carriage of goods between United States ports to United States flagged vessels. The Passenger Services Act is a piece of United States legislation which came into force in 1886 relating to cabotage. Essentially, it says: "No foreign vessels shall transport passengers between ports or places in the United States, either directly or by way of a foreign port, under a penalty of $300 for each passenger so transported and landed." Any vessel subject to the Jones Act counts as a US vessel. hence the need for tha little stop in Victoria, BC on those cruises to Alaska from Seattle :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamedic Posted November 13, 2006 Author #4 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Thank you for the info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougnewmanatsea Posted November 13, 2006 #5 Share Posted November 13, 2006 The Jones Act (aka Merchant Marine Act) is a United States Federal statute that requires U.S.-flagged vessels to be Only certain US-flag vessels. There are also other US-flag vessels that do not have to comply with these rules - e.g. they can be built outside the US. The US-flag vessels that don't comply with the Jones Act are not allowed to engage in coastwise trade - in practice, this means trade between US ports. (Yes, California to Hawaii is "coastwise".) It should be noted that there are multiple "Jones Acts", some of which have absolutely nothing to do with ships. This one is properly known as the Merchant Marine Act of 1920. Nonetheless, it is universally called the Jones Act in the maritime industry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevNeal Posted November 13, 2006 #6 Share Posted November 13, 2006 What is the Jones Act? The Jones Act makes cruising to and from ports in the USA a great big pain in the butt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy_Chief Posted November 13, 2006 #7 Share Posted November 13, 2006 The Jones Act makes cruising to and from ports in the USA a great big pain in the butt. Not to mention your wallet Greg :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pam in CA Posted November 14, 2006 #8 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Only certain US-flag vessels. There are also other US-flag vessels that do not have to comply with these rules - e.g. they can be built outside the US. The US-flag vessels that don't comply with the Jones Act are not allowed to engage in coastwise trade - in practice, this means trade between US ports. (Yes, California to Hawaii is "coastwise".) It should be noted that there are multiple "Jones Acts", some of which have absolutely nothing to do with ships. This one is properly known as the Merchant Marine Act of 1920. Nonetheless, it is universally called the Jones Act in the maritime industry. It's my understanding that if the keel is laid in a U.S. shipyard, the ship can be U.S.-flagged. This is what happened with the NCL ships that were being built in the U.S. before American Cruise Lines (I believe that was the name) went bankrupt. NCL purchased the half-built ships, had them towed to Europe and completed there. NCL was allowed to get them U.S.-flagged so that they could cruise in Hawaii without violating the Jones Act/PSA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyegel Posted November 14, 2006 #9 Share Posted November 14, 2006 The hulls which NCL took over qualified as "American built" only because Sen. Daniel Inouye of Hawaii managed to secure passage of special legislation to exempt them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougnewmanatsea Posted November 14, 2006 #10 Share Posted November 14, 2006 It's my understanding that if the keel is laid in a U.S. shipyard, the ship can be U.S.-flagged. No - it requires more than that. Basically, nothing beyond the most minor of cosmetic work can be done in a foreign yard if the ship is to be engaged in domestic trade. The NCL ships required an Act of Congress and would have been illegal for domestic trade otherwise. For international trade, it's a totally different story... e.g., the US-flag APL container ships that run between the US and Asia have been built foreign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seago2 Posted November 14, 2006 #11 Share Posted November 14, 2006 The Jones Act also functions as a workman's comp for sailors/crewmembers/dockworkers. A sailor can elect one of three remedies blah blah long story short: he will elect a remedy under the Jones Act if he can prove that the shipowner (or stevedore, etc) was negligent. I used to be a maritime lawyer. There is not a lot of maritime work here any more and most of the Jones Act work is found in New Orleans, SFO, NYC, Seattle and Boston. Admiralty and Maritime falls under federal jurisdiction so a sailor can sue anywhere he wants... when you see the term Jones Act used in anything regarding cruise ships it is usually to illustrate why ships with crews subject to the Jones Act will jack up the price of a ticket. Previous posters are correct about needing that stop in a foreign country to bypass cabotage rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted November 14, 2006 #12 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Doesn't a portion of Jones Act (Passenger Carriage Act) also apply to airlines?? A foreign carrier, British Air (for example), is not permitted to fly between two U.S. Cities. Can land or take off in a U.S. city but can not travel directly to another U.S. city (absent emergency situation.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bepsf Posted November 14, 2006 #13 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Doesn't a portion of Jones Act (Passenger Carriage Act) also apply to airlines?? A foreign carrier, British Air (for example), is not permitted to fly between two U.S. Cities. Can land or take off in a U.S. city but can not travel directly to another U.S. city (absent emergency situation.) That would be the Passenger Services Act (a different piece of legislation) - which of course would have nothing to do with the Jones Act, as most foreign-flagged aircarriers fly Boeing airliners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted November 14, 2006 #14 Share Posted November 14, 2006 What does the Boeing part have to do with whether a foreign carrier is permitted to carry passengers directly from one U.S. city to another? I don't understand the connection. Sure, I know Boeing is a U.S. manufacturer but Boeing did not build every plane that every non-U.S. airline flies. Air France cannot fly an airbus between two U.S. cities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougnewmanatsea Posted November 14, 2006 #15 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Doesn't a portion of Jones Act (Passenger Carriage Act) also apply to airlines?? It's a different law - much newer - but it's the same idea. The biggest difference is that unlike ships, the airplanes don't have to be built in the US. So for example, it is perfectly legal for an American airline to use an Airbus (made in France or Germany) to carry passengers and cargo New York to Boston. But even if it is US-flag, a foreign-built ship can't carry passengers or cargo between New York and Boston. most foreign-flagged aircarriers fly Boeing airliners. What does that have to do with anything? What does make a difference is that most domestic US carriers fly Airbuses, or little Bombardier or Embraer regional jets, or other foreign-built aircraft. If they were shipping lines, that wouldn't be allowed. It is rather ironic that the US aircraft industry is still extremely strong even though our own airlines are free to choose foreign airplanes, while the US shippbuilding industry is basically dead even though our shipping lines can't choose foreign ships (for domestic trade). I should also point out that foreign air carriers do operate services within the US - but they don't sell them that way. For example, QANTAS has a flight from New York to Los Angeles, continuing on to Sydney. You can book this flight from New York to Sydney or LA to Sydney, but not New York to LA. Similarly, there is an Asiana flight from New York to Anchorage continuing on to Seoul. You can book it New York-Seoul or Anchorage-Seoul, but not New York-Anchorage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhannah Posted November 14, 2006 #16 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Our gummint at work! Ain't it grand??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruisnfool Posted November 14, 2006 #17 Share Posted November 14, 2006 All I know is the PSA is why I had to get off my beautifull Infinity and get on an old bus to ride to San Diego......now the 14 day r/t stop for 1 hr in Ensenada......arrrg! It was an ulgly end to a beautifull trip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bepsf Posted November 14, 2006 #18 Share Posted November 14, 2006 What does that have to do with anything? What does make a difference is that most domestic US carriers fly Airbuses, or little Bombardier or Embraer regional jets, or other foreign-built aircraft. If they were shipping lines, that wouldn't be allowed. That was my rather-poorly-made point. (Geez, a little snippy today, huh?) :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.