Majesty II Superior Inside - Big enough for 3??

[kelleherdl]

I saw on the floorplan that the II superior inside staterooms are 145 sf. That's pretty big for an inside stateroom. Those who have sailed Majesty II class, was it as comfortable for 3 as one might expect.

 

thanks

[raycruz3]

I have stayed in superior inside on deck three.on ncl majesty.I felt there was plenty enough room .We placed our luggage under beds after unpacking.that helped a lot.my daughter 8 slept on the lil bunk .she loved it :oand then there was two twin beds.I felt there was a lot of space.The bathroom was small.I expected that.:(our room was jj superior inside.there was plenty storage and closet space.hope this helps!:cool:

[Luv4dacruise]

Yes, there is definitely room for 3 in them. With the Majesty's cabins, what i noticed is the cabins compared to other ships have more of the square footage in the width of the room vs. the length. Kinda tricks the mind into making it feel bigger.

 

Im only talking of the superior rooms though (145 sq. ft.), the standard staterooms (108 sq. ft.) theres just no way around it, its feels small.

 

Happy Cruising!

[kathynorth]

We just stayed in an II inside on the Majesty. I would say there is enough room if the 3rd person is a young child. The 3rd berth is a pull down bed. IMO the room is too small for 3 adults unless you enjoy tight spaces.

[flashdog_1]

We had a 145 sq ft cabin on Majesty and it was the smallest cabin we'd ever had. It was well arranged & therefore it was functional, though. There were only two of us. My husband kept bumping his head on the pullman (which we never used). It just protruded into the cabin, above where he sat to watch tv.

 

We had a large suitcase that would not fit under the bed, so it had to be out in the cabin, taking up lots of room. We are both tall, 6'3 and 5'8 and had a double bed. With the suitcase there, along with a deck chair DH had snagged so we'd both have a chair, there was no walking room whatsoever. Whoever slept against the wall could not just scoot down in the bed to get out for a midnight bathroom trip. You have to crawl over the other person. If the bunk were down, anyone who had to use the bathroom in the night would have a really hard time. (Maybe no one in your party needs midnight bathroom breaks. If so you'd be okay).

 

and remember that one bathroom has to serve 3 people. If two of them are adult females, that's trouble right there.

 

Cabin was fine for 2, though.

[*Wink*]

I think your choice would be "fine," but if you could find a Superior cabin that sleeps 4, they have even more room. It's a little known secret. So the cabin you'd be looking for would have 2 bunks that fold down instead of one.

If you're not a member of a deck and cabin plan website, let us know and we'll check it out for you. :)

 

P.S. Beat you to it, iheart!! (inside joke);)

[kelleherdl]

Thanks for the thoughtful offer of looking up a cabin. I know one cabin number is 6051. Saw right off the bat that it is next to a restroom off the casino floor. May not be such a great cabin.

 

I did not know about the deck plan websites. I will think about joining on.

[iheartbda]

p.s. Beat you to it, iheart!! (inside joke);)

Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha!!!:)

Maybe we should keep our mouths shut or else EVERYONE is going to be looking for one.:p

[*Wink*]

Thanks for the thoughtful offer of looking up a cabin. I know one cabin number is 6051. Saw right off the bat that it is next to a restroom off the casino floor. May not be such a great cabin.

 

I did not know about the deck plan websites. I will think about joining on.

LOL iheart. i hear ya. ;)

 

Kelle~We enjoy staying on that deck the most. But the cabins you're talking about are for 3. If you want a little larger one for the 4 of you, try reserving a cabin port side 628 through 636 or 642. Or starboard side 643. We like cabin 645 which is set-up for 3. The higher the numbers, the closer to the Casino. Some people have complained of cigarette smoke around there, but we've never noticed that. We're not gamblers, but that area is close to the elevator/stairs. One level up and you're on the Promenade deck.

[*Wink*]

We had a 145 sq ft cabin on Majesty and it was the smallest cabin we'd ever had. It was well arranged & therefore it was functional, though. There were only two of us. My husband kept bumping his head on the pullman (which we never used). It just protruded into the cabin, above where he sat to watch tv.

 

We had a large suitcase that would not fit under the bed, so it had to be out in the cabin, taking up lots of room. We are both tall, 6'3 and 5'8 and had a double bed. With the suitcase there, along with a deck chair DH had snagged so we'd both have a chair, there was no walking room whatsoever. Whoever slept against the wall could not just scoot down in the bed to get out for a midnight bathroom trip. You have to crawl over the other person. If the bunk were down, anyone who had to use the bathroom in the night would have a really hard time. (Maybe no one in your party needs midnight bathroom breaks. If so you'd be okay).

 

and remember that one bathroom has to serve 3 people. If two of them are adult females, that's trouble right there.

 

Cabin was fine for 2, though.

Phyllis, I'm not doubting what you say, but are you sure you weren't in a 108 sq. ft. cabin? The reason I ask is the 145 sq. ft. cabin we stayed in was very roomy. Even roomier than our Carnival Paradise cabin.

I've stayed in the smaller one, and it was ridiculously small. That's why I'm asking.

But maybe I'm wrong and you're used to staying in even larger cabins. Just curious.

[ninkb]

Those small cabins are really tight. DH and I just struggled through a week in one. Couldn't even walk past each other! It was also disappointing to have only one chair in the cabin - no small sofa or any place to sit other than the floor.

 

DD and her family had one of the 145 sq. ft. cabins (Quad). Used one upper berth for the 3 yr. old and had a pack 'n play for the 9 mo. old at the foot of the parents' bed. It was cozy but it worked. The "larger" cabins also have more dresser storage, and an extra section of closet space. But still only ONE chair.:mad:

 

Fortunately, a week long cruise with Freestyle dining doesn't require a large wardrobe. It can work; just be prepared for tight spaces.

[iheartbda]

Phyllis, I'm not doubting what you say, but are you sure you weren't in a 108 sq. ft. cabin? The reason I ask is the 145 sq. ft. cabin we stayed in was very roomy.

I was wondering that also. We had the beds pushed together with a nightstand/dresser on either side and were able to walk around the bed.

[*Wink*]

I was wondering that also. We had the beds pushed together with a nightstand/dresser on either side and were able to walk around the bed.

Well, one difference I didn't think of was we always keep our beds apart. Hubby snores and I love the buffer space! I bet that's the difference.

[iheartbda]

Hubby snores and I love the buffer space! I bet that's the difference.

I just give mine a good jab in the ribs....works everytime. Maybe because I knocked out his breath as well.:p

[*Wink*]

I just give mine a good jab in the ribs....works everytime. Maybe because I knocked out his breath as well.:p

LOL.. you cheeky little broad! I'll give the ol' rib jab a try. ;)