S.A.M.J.R.

Where do you get that information?

Guidelines or "suggestions"? And if they're not going to enforce their SUGGESTION, then why bother having it?

FWIW, I'm currently at an AI in DR. Their usual dress code at a couple of the restaurants is long pants and collared shirt for men. This week at least, they're allowing shorts because of the heat. Hate to think what some of these posters reactions would be if they were staying here.

So those of us with attractive legs are good in shorts! Funny, I'm guessing if someone said a woman should avoid certain clothing because of her looks, we'd never hear the end of it.

Or folks could have been in bathing suits all day, then change into fresh shorts. What's the difference?

But the crew gets to make that choice. Royal gets to decide which of their policies they enforce. YOU don't If it is so offensive to you, why put up with it?

Bottom line, the HOST, in this case Royal, gets to decide what the "minimum" is. Currently, for sailings in the Caribbean (possibly elsewhere), that's shorts and sandals (crocs). You, as the GUEST, get to decide if that minimum is acceptable to you. If not, find another vacation or don't go to MDR. Seems pretty simple to me. Why participate in something that offends and frustrates you so much (although you "enjoy every second")?

Wait, if you "enjoy every second ", then seeing folks in shorts and/or crocs must not bother you. So what are you arguing?

We were in Labadee in June 2013 also and got an OTW for $250.

While no guarantee, I think asking the doctor/surgeon for their "best guess". While they probably won't say for sure whether she should go, they could give you an idea of what limitations she'd be under. For me, unless the doctor said "no how, no way", I'd go. Even if meant renting a wheelchair.

We paid $53pp for our stop last July (booked during BF sale). $200, heck even $100, would be "sorry kiddos, not this time".

Inflation has little to do with it. The bigger issue is people will pay it. As long as people are willing to pay, why should Royal reduce the cost?

I don't have pictures, but based on my trip last year on Mariner, here's my suggestion (outlet was across the room from the bed)... 1) Reach out to special_needs@rccl.com with your cruise date and cabin number and request an extension cord for your cpap 2) Invest in some magnetic hooks https://www.amazon.com/Magnetic-Ｍaximum-Neodymium-Corrosion-Protection/dp/B0787Q54M1/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?keywords=magnetic+hooks&qid=1685984638&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUEyQ0w1NkNWTFRLMzNLJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwMzYxMzc1MkhEN0lQMjdSTENOJmVuY3J5cHRlZEFkSWQ9QTA4MzAzNzcyMTFCQVE2QzI3VlNGJndpZGdldE5hbWU9c3BfYXRmJmFjdGlvbj1jbGlja1JlZGlyZWN0JmRvTm90TG9nQ2xpY2s9dHJ1ZQ== 3) Invest in a three way outlet adapter (https://www.amazon.com/Cable-Matters-Adapter-Splitter-Multiple/dp/B098CC6W68/ref=sr_1_24?crid=1D7R57UQ8BEX4&keywords=three+prong+outlet&qid=1685984679&sprefix=three+prong+outlet%2Caps%2C115&sr=8-24... but you just need one). 4) Once on the ship, put the hooks on the ceiling on a path between the outlet and the bed. 5) Plug the extension cord in at the outlet, hang them on the hooks, until you get to the bed. 6) Plug a three way outlet adaptor into the end of the extension cord near the bed. 7) Plug each CPAP into a socket on the adapter. No tripping over cords and both CPAPs are plugged in.

There are two different issues here. One is just an "adaptor". Here's one on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/International-Universal-Worldwide-Electrical-Countries/dp/B075VQ9TTS/ref=asc_df_B075VQ9TTS/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=242168461154&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=11244708670102082015&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9014308&hvtargid=pla-424965950141&psc=1. ALL it does is convert the various plug configuration so US cords can plug into them. It does NOT change from 220V to 110V. So you should make sure whatever device you're plugging into it will work with 220V. You can also get a CONVERTER which will "step down" from the 220V and provide 110V. Here's an example: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B073J9QWKY?tag=tripsavvy-onsite-prod-20&linkCode=ogi&th=1&psc=1&ascsubtag=4797126|nb0469f0f8a8a45a5a529aff454dc598216| Note: I'm not recommending either of these products (not saying you shouldn't get them), just a sample of what's out there.

That part of the cord is generic. It will work for multiple devices. You just need to make sure the end that plugs into your power supply matches the socket.

Or for people who just know "I'm eating <early/late> in the MDR" and look for that vs thinking the menu would be the same between them.

For us, when we go to reserve an item, we can select the folks on the other reservations that are linked...

Good thing everyone knows you've added to your ignore list! My day is now complete. Back to the OP... 1) I agree, a 15' cord may not be long enough and isn't a good solution. 2) I have no experience with CPAP battery systems, but as long as a) it can run the CPAP overnight and b) get fully charged during the day, no reason why it shouldn't work. 3) I recommend magnetic hooks that you can attach to the ceiling and drape extension cords (provided by the ship) through so you're walking UNDER the cords.

How late do they offer massages though (I'm surprised they offer any on embarkation day)? Do lunch first, then the massage.

I disagree with a cruise ship being "effectively lawless". First, while I know people get attacked on ships, I'd be much more concerned with my kids being in a major city. I hope the Dad in your story followed up and reported the incident. That would also be a teaching moment for the child. Going back to the room is probably NOT the best choice. Going to an area with lots of crew... pool deck, restaurant, promenade, or even GS is the best play, IMO. Now, a pre-teen (heck, anyone) in this situation isn't going to think straight, that's why it's a teaching moment.

One could make the argument that if you DON'T trust your kids to show up at a meeting place on time or to leave a message in the room then they're not ready to be "out on their own". Again, saying "you don't need to use technology" *IS* a valid response to the OPs question. As far as your example of being uncomfortable around a group of other people, let's play this out. Your child is uncomfortable wherever they are on a ship. The right thing to do is to call their parents to do what? Come "rescue" them? I'm just not picturing it. I would tell *MY* kids to simply walk away. Separate yourself from the situation. Again, if I didn't trust them to do that, I don't trust them to be on their own. I see this totally different than being somewhere "in real life" where one could be MILES away from "safety". Do others feel more "comfortable" they can reach their kids 24/7? No doubt. Doesn't mean it's needed.

Really? Go back and read the OP. "Just do it without technology, we've done it for years" IS a valid answer to the question. All my kids have cell phones. I appreciate being able to reach them/they can reach us if there's an issue. But that's in "normal" life. Did their car break down somewhere? Did their ride desert them? Do they need picked up somewhere? But *I* view being on vacation (depending on the vacation of course), especially on a ship, as different. Yes, it's basically a small city. But a lot of concerns that I have on land are not there on a ship. I don't have to worry about them getting stranded miles away from safety. "Getting turned around on a ship"? Surely they can ask an employee (or even another passenger) for guidance. But what is "something happens otherwise" that the parents won't be notified (probably pretty quickly) UNLESS the kids have cell phones/immediate contact? Obviously everyone parents differently and has their own worries AND can do what they want.

huh. Our kids will tell us where they're going (mostly). How did us parents survive when we were teens and there were no cell phones/tracking? Do you REALLY need to be able to check in with your teens 24/7 (general, rhetorical question)? And even having a texting option doesn't mean the kids aren't doing something they shouldn't.

Or an Android.