guernseyguy Posted August 9, 2010 #76 Share Posted August 9, 2010 RCL...main restaurant meals were excelleant and if I dare say better than Cunard and the service was every bit as good as Cunard white star Fighting talk! On my one cruise on RCL I found the food very good - my only gripe was the balance - a huge chunk of protein and almost no vegetables. I guess the accountants had counted the number of returned carrots & peas and decided not to serve them in the first place! Food is so subjective, on balance I'd give the edge to Cunard, but it was pretty close (both on the other hand clearly better than Princess). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savoia Posted August 9, 2010 #77 Share Posted August 9, 2010 Food is so subjective, on balance I'd give the edge to Cunard, -NO!? Really? Shocked by that one! but it was pretty close (both on the other hand clearly better than Princess). -Odd that you say that considering Princess provides all the service on the Cunard themed vessels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithm Posted August 10, 2010 #78 Share Posted August 10, 2010 True, but will you be "allowed" to just choose one course? There have been times when I have wanted to have 2 portions of the appetizers as my main course (i.e Frogs legs with just the potatoes of that night) and I was told (in the Britannia )that it could not be done. I did not understand why, -I was not asking for something not on the menu, - just a double portion serving in place of whatever the entrees were. I think that anyone going into the Verandah will be told they only serve full meals, even though the items are priced individually. Also I would be interested to learn how many and what choice of each course will there be. Will the menu be outside for viewing? Well I suppose we will just have to wait and see how things are arranged when QE finally comes out. We've never had a problem asking for a larger portion. If you wanted Caviar in Britannia you can get it(a fee does apply)One thing we always did in Britannia(and now the Grills)was to ask for a Sorbet "intermezzo" between the appetizer & main course. It's never been refused. Always feel free to talk to the Maitre D, if you have any issues. That's part of their job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garigoun Posted August 10, 2010 #79 Share Posted August 10, 2010 I have an idea(Don’t laugh). Supposing everyone were to take the words P&O; Princess; Carnival; Cunard; Cunardival; Carol Marlowe; Light fittings Shanks and Celebrity throw in a few assorted conjunctions, oblique strokes and references to the décor of ships long past and mix them up well. Then each of us should make a post once a day containing them all in random order. Would not that save poor old Savoia a great deal of finger work posting his yawningly predictable ordure day after day? In a spirit of benevolent charity it is clearly the right thing to do. It’s not that I don’t agree with SOME of his stuff or even know whether he is right or not but he is just so damn tedious with his constant repetition. Let us therefore perform this corporal work of mercy without delay. If for no other reason than to stop the excessive wear and tear on the ‘P’ and ‘O’ keys of his machine. A Concerned Gari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salacia Posted August 10, 2010 #80 Share Posted August 10, 2010 I have an idea(Don’t laugh). Supposing everyone were to take the words P&O; Princess; Carnival; Cunard; Cunardival; Carol Marlowe; Light fittings Shanks and Celebrity throw in a few assorted conjunctions, oblique strokes and references to the décor of ships long past and mix them up well. Then each of us should make a post once a day containing them all in random order. Would not that save poor old Savoia a great deal of finger work posting his yawningly predictable ordure day after day? In a spirit of benevolent charity it is clearly the right thing to do. It’s not that I don’t agree with SOME of his stuff or even know whether he is right or not but he is just so damn tedious with his constant repetition. Let us therefore perform this corporal work of mercy without delay. If for no other reason than to stop the excessive wear and tear on the ‘P’ and ‘O’ keys of his machine.A Concerned Gari Ok, I'm game.:D Here goes: Princess Carol met Marlowe to discuss the decor and light fittings at the Carnival. In attendence was a Celebrity and more than a few Shanks. Yet no one was P.O.'d, despite one local news source referring to the festivities as a Cunardival. Fumbling her words, a local TV reporter added further humor to the story by mistakingly referring to the incident as a terrible Cunard rather than the canard it was. Humiliated, she asked her editor for a transfer. He replied "that ship has long past sailed". I think I got all the words in...how many P&O keys have I save from destruction :D -Salacia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guernseyguy Posted August 10, 2010 #81 Share Posted August 10, 2010 I have an idea(Don’t laugh). Supposing everyone were to take the words P&O; Princess; Carnival; Cunard; Cunardival; Carol Marlowe; Light fittings Shanks and Celebrity Celebrity Princess Carol Shanks-Cunardival attended Marlowe for the Carnival and was the fitting choice to name P&O's new Cunard-based cruise ship. She made light of suggestions that they were 'all the same' and said that people who'd sailed on them didn't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guernseyguy Posted August 10, 2010 #82 Share Posted August 10, 2010 There have been times when I have wanted to have 2 portions of the appetizers as my main course (i.e Frogs legs with just the potatoes of that night) and I was told (in the Britannia )that it could not be done. Did you speak to the Maitre'D about it? Seems silly to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsilverfox Posted August 10, 2010 #83 Share Posted August 10, 2010 Sadly Garigoun, I think that you may be missing the point. To avoid getting yet another posting canned I'll use a hopefully neutral analogy. I've never sailed on a Silverseas ship so I have no personal idea what they are like, how enjoyable they are or how they would suit my tastes, or how they are managed. If therefore for some very bizarre reason I wanted to keep contributing to the Silverseas forum, there is only an extremely limited number of aspects of shipboard life that I think could usefully contribute to, without resorting to recycling other peoples views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garigoun Posted August 10, 2010 #84 Share Posted August 10, 2010 Ok, I'm game.:D Here goes:Princess Carol met Marlowe to discuss the decor and light fittings at the Carnival. In attendence was a Celebrity and more than a few Shanks. Yet no one was P.O.'d, despite one local news source referring to the festivities as a Cunardival. Fumbling her words, a local TV reporter added further humor to the story by mistakingly referring to the incident as a terrible Cunard rather than the canard it was. Humiliated, she asked her editor for a transfer. He replied "that ship has long past sailed". I think I got all the words in...how many P&O keys have I save from destruction :D -Salacia No No , that will not do at all, it is amusing, and to be true to type it must be pedestrian and dull. however it may serve as an example to be followed by the aforesaid poster. Gari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garigoun Posted August 10, 2010 #85 Share Posted August 10, 2010 Sadly Garigoun, I think that you may be missing the point. To avoid getting yet another posting canned I'll use a hopefully neutral analogy. I've never sailed on a Silverseas ship so I have no personal idea what they are like, how enjoyable they are or how they would suit my tastes, or how they are managed. If therefore for some very bizarre reason I wanted to keep contributing to the Silverseas forum, there is only an extremely limited number of aspects of shipboard life that I think could usefully contribute to, without resorting to recycling other peoples views. You may be, and probably are, right. I often do miss the point. But I'm not entirely sure to which of my posts you are referring here. ?? Gari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsilverfox Posted August 10, 2010 #86 Share Posted August 10, 2010 Apologies Garigoun, Actually none of your positive entertaining posts. I was just adding my personal two pennyworth to your post# 79. Best wishes Oldsilverfox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimsgirl Posted August 10, 2010 #87 Share Posted August 10, 2010 Guernseyguy Yes I did ask the Maitre "D politely if the waiter was incorrect, he claimed it "must have been a misunderstanding" , and that was that. I let it go Frogs Legs were not worth "a war", and I mention them only because I do not think it right that if a poster writes re a bad cruise then automatically there is a spate of mail claiming the writer must be a "whinger" or someone who is "rude " to staff.and that Cunard is "wonderful" ,"super" etc etc. I favour Cunard, will soon be making my 13th cruise with them, but I am a realist, and I know that not every cruise will be the "dream " of a lifetime.and my experience in D8 will be far different to someone in the Balmoral suite. So I give the "bad cruise "writer the benefit of being accurate as far as his/her experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithm Posted August 12, 2010 #88 Share Posted August 12, 2010 Ok, I'm game.:D Here goes:Princess Carol met Marlowe to discuss the decor and light fittings at the Carnival. In attendence was a Celebrity and more than a few Shanks. Yet no one was P.O.'d, despite one local news source referring to the festivities as a Cunardival. Fumbling her words, a local TV reporter added further humor to the story by mistakingly referring to the incident as a terrible Cunard rather than the canard it was. Humiliated, she asked her editor for a transfer. He replied "that ship has long past sailed". I think I got all the words in...how many P&O keys have I save from destruction :D -Salacia Not bad at all! Jay Leno are you listening?? We've got some pretty good writers on board here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithm Posted August 12, 2010 #89 Share Posted August 12, 2010 Kudos then to P&O marketing and the one desk Cunard has in California that handles the PR paperwork from P&O. That is insane to pay that much for a ship that is handled on every level by the Love Boat comapny. Actually I think the Loveboat Co. became RCC. To put all this in "car" terms..Think of Carnival as GM..Cunard/Cadillac, HAL/Buick, Princess/Pontiac,Carnival/Chevrolet. You will have a fair amount of "blending" of the car/cruiselines. The thing to understand, is that Cunard is marketed as a more "premium" line than the rest of Carnivalcorp. Their small Seaborn group is up there with Seadream,SilverSea, Hapog/LLoyd. Cunard is THE ONLY line to cover from "Standard(inside no view)all the way to full luxury(Queens Grill suites)No other cruiseline can cover the entire spectrum the way Cunard can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salacia Posted August 12, 2010 #90 Share Posted August 12, 2010 Not bad at all! Jay Leno are you listening?? We've got some pretty good writers on board here. Thanks Keithm, but Gari pays sooooooooooo much better than Leno :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guernseyguy Posted August 12, 2010 #91 Share Posted August 12, 2010 I do not think it right that if a poster writes re a bad cruise then automatically there is a spate of mail claiming the writer must be a "whinger" or someone who is "rude " to staff.and that Cunard is "wonderful" ,"super" etc etc. I think what people react to is the poster for whom EVERYTHING was bad - and in my view, fairly, conclude that the problem may as easily lie with the poster as with Cunard. Balanced, constructive reviews,in my experience, are treated with respect - even for those whose overall experience was more bad than good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savoia Posted September 1, 2010 #92 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Savoia, I think there's a problem with your argument: If there is 'no Cunard in Cunard' (as you seem to be implying), then Cunard can't have any competition, right? Doesn't it? Being operated on nearly every level by Princess Cruises this product would therefor have competition..on a Princess level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dancer11 Posted September 18, 2010 #93 Share Posted September 18, 2010 I find this thread very interesting, as we will be on world cruise and know we will want a change from Britannia Club during such a long trip. We've only been on one QM2 cruise, in the Caribbean, and were unimpressed with Todd English. On Crystal we often dine at the excellent alternative restaurants and don't mind paying a bit extra. But on the QM2, I hated the feeling of the casual lunch buffet area, which is then transformed into the Italian and Asian restaurants in the evening. I felt that if it reminded me of a high school cafeteria in the daytime, there wasn't much hope it would be a lovely restaurant at night. Consequently, we never went there for any meals. Was I totally wrong? I hope so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray66 Posted September 19, 2010 #94 Share Posted September 19, 2010 But on the QM2, I hated the feeling of the casual lunch buffet area, which is then transformed into the Italian and Asian restaurants in the evening. I felt that if it reminded me of a high school cafeteria in the daytime, there wasn't much hope it would be a lovely restaurant at night. Consequently, we never went there for any meals. Was I totally wrong? I hope so. During the evening the Kings Court looks a lot different. The pictures are lit up and the Lotus area is screened off to make it more private. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brigittetom Posted September 21, 2010 #95 Share Posted September 21, 2010 dancer11, The Lotus in the evening is a wonderful experience and has absolutely nothing to do with KC during the day. Lights are dimmed, intimate tables, and the service is outstanding, as is the food. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bispham Boo Posted September 21, 2010 #96 Share Posted September 21, 2010 dancer11, The Lotus in the evening is a wonderful experience and has absolutely nothing to do with KC during the day. Lights are dimmed, intimate tables, and the service is outstanding, as is the food. We enjoyed the Lotus very much on our TA last year. The atmosphere was very different to daytime and the food outstanding - definitely worth trying as a change from Britannia (which we also enjoyed). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithm Posted September 21, 2010 #97 Share Posted September 21, 2010 dancer11, The Lotus in the evening is a wonderful experience and has absolutely nothing to do with KC during the day. Lights are dimmed, intimate tables, and the service is outstanding, as is the food. The tasting menu is definately worth it in Lotus. We've been in the Grills & still try to get 1 night in Lotus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dancer11 Posted November 4, 2010 #98 Share Posted November 4, 2010 That sounds great, thank you. The pictures were a big help. At noon meals I didn't like the area at all, too much like eating in the school cafeteria when I was young. But at dinner it looks very different, and of course it will be so much less crowded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.