pablo312 Posted April 28, 2005 #126 Share Posted April 28, 2005 No doubt Cathy, but what if it was in RCI's interests to have passengers cancel the cruise. Should not they be allowed to encourage people to cancel the cruise by making one a great offer and one a not great offer? There are a lot of different ways to look at this situation and we don't know what RCI views as the best outcome for them as a corporate entity. That may be correct from a strictly short term economic viewpoint, and a viewpoint that neglects marketing. Unlike oil companies, the cruise industry depends on consumer goodwill. Suppose a cruise company makes decisions that are good from a very short term financial standpoint, but will cost a significant amount of market share. Their long term profits will be adversely impacted. You will probably say the Grandeur delay is an isolated incident. I don't believe that is true. Per Dr. Gray, we will be in an active hurricane period for the next 20 to 30 years. This means delays in cruise schedules will be somewhat frequent from the June to November period. If RCL or others makes decisions that do not consider the consumer, they will lose market share to other vacation options. Not a very good business practice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare xpcdoojk Posted April 28, 2005 #127 Share Posted April 28, 2005 That may be correct from a strictly short term economic viewpoint, and a viewpoint that neglects marketing. Unlike oil companies, the cruise industry depends on consumer goodwill. Suppose a cruise company makes decisions that are good from a very short term financial standpoint, but will cost a significant amount of market share. Their long term profits will be adversely impacted. You will probably say the Grandeur delay is an isolated incident. I don't believe that is true. Per Dr. Gray, we will be in an active hurricane period for the next 20 to 30 years. This means delays in cruise schedules will be somewhat frequent from the June to November period. If RCL or others makes decisions that do not consider the consumer, they will lose market share to other vacation options. Not a very good business practice. I love those 20 to 30 year weather forecasts!:D ;) jc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pablo312 Posted April 28, 2005 #128 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I love those 20 to 30 year weather forecasts!:D ;) jc I thought you wanted thought-provoking, emotionless discussions. Your response was weak......and not very logical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terri23 Posted April 28, 2005 #129 Share Posted April 28, 2005 You know, if CC put "% poofed" under the number of posts, we'd have a better idea which members engage in objective, thought provoking, informative, etc. discussions and which posters are better avoided...;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fisherlady48 Posted April 28, 2005 #130 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I am glad this thread was started. This was an "accident". I honestly believe that RCCL did not get the full scope of damage to the ship for some time after the accident. What saved it from damaging it further was the fact that it stayed above the water line. and I have no doubt that those of you who cancelled for whatever reason will not get anything further from RCCL. Those who cruised probably did. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OBAYbee Posted April 28, 2005 #131 Share Posted April 28, 2005 You know, if CC put "% poofed" under the number of posts, we'd have a better idea which members engage in objective, thought provoking, informative, etc. discussions and which posters are better avoided...;) LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tra4 Posted April 28, 2005 #132 Share Posted April 28, 2005 See JC, try to be funny, and they want thought provoking, give them logic and thought provoking and you are picking on people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1corona4u Posted April 28, 2005 #133 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I thought you wanted thought-provoking, emotionless discussions. Your response was weak......and not very logical. Pablo, unless Dr. Gray has a psychic friend network, I doubt he is more than speculating. Which is ok, but the reality is, that the hurricanes will be driven/directed by the "Bermuda High", which is controlled/moved by weather systems that haven't even been formed yet. It is still intact from last year, but that could change. So let's just leave the hurricanes to Mother Nature, shall we?:cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare xpcdoojk Posted April 28, 2005 #134 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I thought you wanted thought-provoking, emotionless discussions. Your response was weak......and not very logical. Really a 30 year forecast is logical?:confused: I was told yesterday by the tv meteorologist before I went to the golf course that it was not going to rain. I got to the 15th hole and got drenched. :D Of course, I am sure Dr. Gray would have warned me of that thunderstorm.:rolleyes: jc<---- I am not a meteorologist nor do I pretend to play one at CC, however, I do know how to use google. Just a couple of fun sites I found. http://www.wxresearch.com/outlook/claud2003.htm and I really enjoyed this light hearted one as for me it hit the right chord about what passes for science in our world today.(below) http://www.coralsprings.com/article1/myth_of_weather_forecasting2.htm I really think everyone should check out the above link! With that the defense rests your Honor! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tra4 Posted April 28, 2005 #135 Share Posted April 28, 2005 there you go again, being logical!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terri23 Posted April 28, 2005 #136 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I don't think the point was to analyze the accuracy of long-term weather prediction models. Rather, it has been suggested that the likelihood of severe weather, such as hurricanes, can be expected to increase in the next few decades due to a variety of factors (including increases in temperature a.k.a. global warming). Naturally, any increase in hurricane frequency affects our favorite pastime and we should be prepared to deal with it (preferably at the Schooner Bar rather than in the courtroom). JMHO, natch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nosnobunny Posted April 28, 2005 #137 Share Posted April 28, 2005 Looks like you can please some of the people some of the time, but........ Give it up jc, it's a no-win situation. :rolleyes: Beth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terri23 Posted April 28, 2005 #138 Share Posted April 28, 2005 it's a slow day at the office, gotta be to debate meteorolgy. Guess I'll go check to see if RCCL's summer 2006 dates are out yet :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare xpcdoojk Posted April 28, 2005 #139 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I don't think the point was to analyze the accuracy of long-term weather prediction models. Rather, it has been suggested that the likelihood of severe weather, such as hurricanes, can be expected to increase in the next few decades due to a variety of factors (including increases in temperature a.k.a. global warming). Naturally, any increase in hurricane frequency affects our favorite pastime and we should be prepared to deal with it (preferably at the Schooner Bar rather than in the courtroom). JMHO, natch. Yeah, I read somewhere once that there is something called the hurricane season, and it seems from what I remember that it happens on a regular, perhaps even annual basis. That perhaps, while it might not always have been called "the hurricane season" by the native Americans a thousand years ago it was possible that they perceived something about an annual increase in storms that made a mess of their ocean front communities. I am not nearly bright enough to be able to intelligently discuss global warming, especially since nobody knows for a "fact" that it even exists. But then science today is pretty amazing. One day eat lots of protein, the next day eat oatmeal, the day after that don't eat meat, then the day after that we are all going to die from killer bees. I did recently read a good novel called "State of Fear" by Micheal Chrichton that hit a chord with me. Kind of like the chord that second link I provided a moment ago did. jc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Rare LauraS Posted April 28, 2005 Administrators #140 Share Posted April 28, 2005 You know, if CC put "% poofed" under the number of posts, we'd have a better idea which members engage in objective, thought provoking, informative, etc. discussions and which posters are better avoided...;) ACTUALLY....when a post is POOFED it is deducted from one's total . Play nice........ Laura Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.