Jump to content

Should cruise lines allow "no fly" passengers on long/distant cruises?


cruisemom42
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

On 3/15/2020 at 2:15 PM, Mary229 said:

Why?  The cruise lines are pretty clear that they are a hotel and transportation service.  Perhaps cruisers have been expecting too much. 

If they expect that they would might never have to fly home, than yes they have been expecting too much. If a passenger got ill on a cruise and had to be put off for treatment.  a case where the ship might have mechanical issues. A case where weather might prevent a ship from reaching its planned port.  Port change due to tsunami.  port changes due to illness.  Port change due to civil unrest.   All of these have happened prior to this outbreak.  All of them have required passengers to fly to a destination that they planned to reach by ship.

 

I can see where there might be an expectation of the cruise line getting people home by another method.  However, that method usually means flying.

Edited by npcl
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail Beyond the Ordinary with Oceania Cruises
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: The Widest View in the Whole Wide World
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...