The reporter of this piece starts out with:
“If you plan a trip with another person — a spouse, a companion, a friend — and if your travel partner has to cancel, you could be stuck with thousands of dollars in extra charges.
“We don’t mean losing the money paid for the person who can’t take the trip.
We mean extra charges, just for traveling as a single.”
And then she goes on to paint Mr. Anderson as a victim of Viking’s rapaciousness for charging a single supplement, something common in the cruise industry.
After Viking offers him additional vouchers, Mr. Anderson decides that’s proof Viking is corrupt: “I believe the fact Viking is willing to give me vouchers worth twice the value of my requested cash refund indicates they recognize that they have done something wrong.”
Damned if you do …
To be clear, I’m not a big fan of the business side of Viking for a variety of reasons. But this article is just irresponsible (and ignorant) journalism, trying to create outrage and cast themselves as Fighters for Justice Against Evil where none exists. Meh.