podgeandrodge

Possibly down to varying interpretations of "entitled journey" and "store" etc. per above - somewhere in the above regulations must lie the facts, and the facts apply to all, not just certain lines.

I've done it. Got same response as posted earlier. Definitely a Group Wide party line on this right now. Whether that means they are trying to sort out the mess while they hold that line, or whether they are simply sticking their heads in the sand.........we shall see... but they are damaging the brand.

One things for sure - NCL have agreed in both US and EU given similar wordings to adopt the same message. hopefully they are planning how to fix things...

the answer must be in here somewhere!

I didn't post that!, also you've posted some comments without your own - possibly you are hitting wrong button.

Yes. Argument that at the very least NCL would have to say if you purchase you might get a drink or "may" 🙂

Ironically, "may be served" could also mean is "allowed to be served" rather than "might be" !

That subsequent response is shocking, but perhaps shows a 'company line' is being rapidly enforced. Hopefully means they are closing ranks with a view to addressing the issue.

Further to SouthamptonCruiseFan's post above, this link may provide some information, if someone has the time to go through it. (Apologies if I am posting irrelevant nonsense, but it looks relevant). To me it seems that this must be interpretational between the lines, or as SouthamptonCruiseFan said, a deliberate decision by NCL not to pay duty. Either way, NCL should not hide behind "UK customs rules" - it's a lie hiding behind a truth - yes, it's because of UK customs, but ONLY because NCL doesn't want to fix the issue, unlike other lines. Some screenshots below, but best to read the website. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/excise-notice-69a-duty-free-ships-stores/excise-notice-69a-duty-free-ships-stores

Doesn't explain why UK ports they are not allowing people with beverage package get a drink unfortunately

You're cheerleading the indefensible so much on here, I'm beginning to think you just like winding people up. Either that, or you're the type that could be sold sand before a visit to the Sahara, and suck it up when you got there and saw the desert.

It is quite clear, as of October 2022 anyway per lovemycruisetoo, that a SOLO traveller gets a Latitude "dinner for 2 with wine", "dinner for two". In a long thread, which I didn't want to open up again, ggTexasGal mentioned that "You, as a Solo traveler, have access to 2 Latitudes specialty dining meals during a cruise of 5 days or longer. Anyone with whom you choose to dine, is on their own for "how" their meal will be paid!" Others have contradicted this, and stated that they, as SOLO travellers, have been still able to treat another guest to the meal if they dine with them. Poster UKstages on here made the distinction that a SOLO TRAVELLER can treat another guest, it's just that Norwegian don't want a SOLO DINER having 2 meals, only one. The confusion seems to stem from the language Norweigan are using - """"""""Effective September 14, 2022, Latitudes Rewards members who reach a tier eligible for the Dinner for Two benefits will receive 2 Dinner for Two vouchers to be used at any specialty restaurant on sailings 5-days or longer." • 2 guests maximum – Dinner for Two vouchers are issued as a per stateroom benefit. • SOLO TRAVELLERS ARE ELIGIBLE FOR ONE DINNER FOR EACH VOUCHER."""""""" I think that NCL simply mean that solo travellers can't tuck into 2 meals if they are on their own at the table. But they can still treat another passenger. Love some confirmation please. EDIT - MORE CONFUSING LANGUAGE ON THE FAQ ON NCL WEBSITE, which states "solo travellers get two dinners for one" - I don't think this is what they mean, - they mean "solo diners". Can I still split the dinner for two vouchers if I am a solo traveller (two meals for one person)? No, this benefit is delivered as two dinners for two per stateroom. Solo travellers get two dinners for one. You cannot split the voucher in to two separate vouchers and redeem the dinners on two separate evenings. The benefit is only if there are two guests dining on the same visit.

So does Sapphire allow you to skip the line for entertainment shows, as well as dining? Is it up to the staff at the doorway i.e. could they refuse and mortify you as you walk back to the back of the line? 😲 In terms of the Behind the Scenes Tour, I'm currently Platinum (easy these days with the extra points I guess, but took me a lot of cruises), and I would suggest they leave the current BTS tour for Platinum, but perhaps give the "Paid" BTS tour to Saphire, thus adding value. Right now, I just don't see much value in progressing from Platinum.

Or the "Platinum and up" tour !

Still ok for me, but I'm doing it from the Europe site, perhaps that is different...

Yes, interesting to hear more on this, incl impact on those with beverage packages (which is probably most people these days)

Yep, works like that for me too.

I'm currently Platinum, and appreciate the couple of meals/laundry etc. for what it is. Don't see much benefit at all in progressing to Sapphire (Priority Restaurant & Entertainment Seating subject to availability and Dinner with Officers - don't see the attraction myself). Given you get to Platinum at 75 points, and then have another 75 to get to Sapphire, they could try to make it somewhat worthwhile, and perhaps give the full behind the scenes tour on reaching Sapphire. It's funny, Diamond and Ambassador are probably unattainable for most, but for those that do get there, there is f all extra given from the latitudes rewards of much consequence.

Can they charge that 10% if you're on a beverage package?

I think the coffee from the Hamilton Beach machines is pretty good. I generally bring some extra pods with me to avoid having to ask for extra pods every day - from Amazon etc. "Senseo coffee pods".

It would be helpful if NCL could post the "Port of Civitavecchia Regulations" referred to, if only to get an idea of the background/logic to such a weird rule.

Bizarre rule, don't recall being affected by that last time at that port. Logic is lost on me.

Thanks! Yes, on the Pixel I think you'll have problems replicating the Samsung set up. Seemingly Google have software disabled the functionality (known as DLP alt mode I think) to sell Chromecast! Interesting to hear if you manage it!

Works with Pixel Pro 7 too? Thanks

Thanks mking for the live review. Tech question------You mentioned at the outset that """""Pixel 7P accessing the mSD memory card via the USB-C Dongle, play video & output via HDMI""""""- I have the Pixel 7 Pro, but didn't think it had USB-C video output i.e. usb-c to HDMI cable wouldn't work to TV. Is it that the USB-C dongle allows this function as it has a HDMI port on it? (I still thought only the Samsung's had the function!). Secondly, """"s Platinum & Sapphire or Diamonds, with 15 days at sea, we get 2 free bags of laundry done...""""" - good to know, the latitude rewards page doesn't state this or I couldn't find it anyway!