Onetrufan Posted February 19, 2013 #1 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Filed today... http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/2/prweb10436918.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwjoe Posted February 19, 2013 #2 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Thanks for the link. I'm wondering how they will get around the "no class action" provision that is in CCL's ticket contract. (Sorry for the caps). http://www.carnival.com/about-carnival/legal-notice/ticket-contract.aspx 13. CLASS ACTION WAIVER THIS CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR THE EXCLUSIVE RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES THROUGH INDIVIDUAL LEGAL ACTION ON GUEST'S OWN BEHALF INSTEAD OF THROUGH ANY CLASS ACTION. EVEN IF THE APPLICABLE LAW PROVIDES OTHERWISE, GUEST AGREES THAT ANY ARBITRATION OR LAWSUIT AGAINST CARRIER WHATSOEVER SHALL BE LITIGATED BY GUEST INDIVIDUALLY AND NOT AS A MEMBER OF ANY CLASS OR AS PART OF A CLASS ACTION, AND GUEST EXPRESSLY AGREES TO WAIVE ANY LAW ENTITLING GUEST TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS ACTION. IF GUEST'S CLAIM IS SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION UNDER CLAUSE 12 (d) ABOVE, THE ARBITRATOR SHALL HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO ARBITRATE CLAIMS ON A CLASS ACTION BASIS. GUEST AGREES THAT THIS SECTION SHALL NOT BE SEVERABLE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES FROM THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 12 (d) ABOVE, AND IF FOR ANY REASON THIS CLASS ACTION WAIVER IS UNENFORCEABLE AS TO ANY PARTICULAR CLAIM, THEN AND ONLY THEN SUCH CLAIM SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yogimax Posted February 19, 2013 #3 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Simple... Negligence trumps small print! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwjoe Posted February 19, 2013 #4 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Me, too. Such provisions are usually upheld by the court. There was a California case that went up to the US Supreme Court on the issue - contract required arbitration and forbade class actions, and the Court found it to be enforceable. Indeed. And that despite a California state law to the contrary. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-27/at-t-unit-wins-arbitration-case-at-u-s-supreme-court.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare songbird1329 Posted February 19, 2013 #5 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Me, too. Such provisions are usually upheld by the court. There was a California case that went up to the US Supreme Court on the issue - contract required arbitration and forbade class actions, and the Court found it to be enforceable. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare songbird1329 Posted February 19, 2013 #6 Share Posted February 19, 2013 http://articles.latimes.com/2011/apr/28/business/la-fi-court-class-action-20110428 Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy Giard Posted February 19, 2013 #7 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Thanks for the link. I'm wondering how they will get around the "no class action" provision that is in CCL's ticket contract. (Sorry for the caps). Lawyers, guns and/or money can over ride ANY "contract". ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkNC Posted February 19, 2013 #8 Share Posted February 19, 2013 What a shock! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyn7 Posted February 19, 2013 #9 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I notice it's the same attorney who's been on every possible News Talk Show he could be on over the past week. Apart from the shipboard conditions caused by the cruise ship fire, Lipcon also points out that Carnival’s decision to tow the Triumph to Mobile, instead of the closer port of Progreso, Mexico, caused passengers to endure more time onboard the disabled vessel than was necessary, prolonging their exposure to disease, accidents and trauma. If the basis of his claim for the lawsuit is that Carnival should have towed the ship to Progresso because it would have taken less time, then I would like to see all the people who are experts in ocean currents, sea towing and the like tear him to shreds in court. I don't have disdain for all attorneys but this guy is an ambulance chaser at his finest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare songbird1329 Posted February 19, 2013 #10 Share Posted February 19, 2013 Lawyers, guns and/or money can over ride ANY "contract". ;) But not a federal court judge with a lifetime appointment in Miami. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbsteve Posted February 19, 2013 #11 Share Posted February 19, 2013 They did not name a lead plantiff in the article, I wonder if the lawyers filed the suit, hoping someone would call wanting in, in order to proceed. Without a main plaintiff, and additional ones, the case is dismissed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyn7 Posted February 19, 2013 #12 Share Posted February 19, 2013 They did not name a lead plantiff in the article, I wonder if the lawyers filed the suit, hoping someone would call wanting in, in order to proceed. Without a main plaintiff, and additional ones, the case is dismissed. I was looking to see if i could find online access to the filing, i know how to find things on my local court's webpage. Where would we go to find this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruisin' Cool CAT Posted February 19, 2013 #13 Share Posted February 19, 2013 :eek: If people are so fragile they should reconsider ever leaving their house! :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare songbird1329 Posted February 19, 2013 #14 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I notice it's the same attorney who's been on every possible News Talk Show he could be on over the past week. Apart from the shipboard conditions caused by the cruise ship fire, Lipcon also points out that Carnival’s decision to tow the Triumph to Mobile, instead of the closer port of Progreso, Mexico, caused passengers to endure more time onboard the disabled vessel than was necessary, prolonging their exposure to disease, accidents and trauma. If the basis of his claim for the lawsuit is that Carnival should have towed the ship to Progresso because it would have taken less time, then I would like to see all the people who are experts in ocean currents, sea towing and the like tear him to shreds in court. I don't have disdain for all attorneys but this guy is an ambulance chaser at his finest. I'm loving his "spin". Want to see jow far it gets. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare songbird1329 Posted February 19, 2013 #15 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I was looking to see if i could find online access to the filing, i know how to find things on my local court's webpage. Where would we go to find this? It's federal court. You need access to PACER. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare Cruisegirl6 Posted February 19, 2013 #16 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I hope all cruise lines ban these people that file! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare songbird1329 Posted February 19, 2013 #17 Share Posted February 19, 2013 They did not name a lead plantiff in the article, I wonder if the lawyers filed the suit, hoping someone would call wanting in, in order to proceed. Without a main plaintiff, and additional ones, the case is dismissed. They have to have a lead plaintiff/ class representative. But if you look at their whole site they are actively soliciting clients for the class action. I don't think they can get the class certified. The back up plan is probably to have as many clients as possible for an individual suit. Costs shared by 10-20 plaintiffs, easier for the lawyer to proceed with the suit. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holders3 Posted February 19, 2013 #18 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I'd love to see any stats on the amount of money any participant in a class action suit gets vs the monies the lawyers bill for years of litigation. Once I responded to a class action postcard just to see where it would go. Forgot all about it and got a check for $2.50 a couple years later. Firms like this disgust me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare songbird1329 Posted February 19, 2013 #19 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I'd love to see any stats on the amount of money any participant in a class action suit gets vs the monies the lawyers bill for years of litigation. Once I responded to a class action postcard just to see where it would go. Forgot all about it and got a check for $2.50 a couple years later. Firms like this disgust me. The lawyers get paid and the consumers get token settlements. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwjoe Posted February 19, 2013 #20 Share Posted February 19, 2013 The back up plan is probably to have as many clients as possible for an individual suit. Costs shared by 10-20 plaintiffs, easier for the lawyer to proceed with the suit. That sounds logical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruisin' Cool CAT Posted February 19, 2013 #21 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I'd love to see any stats on the amount of money any participant in a class action suit gets vs the monies the lawyers bill for years of litigation. Once I responded to a class action postcard just to see where it would go. Forgot all about it and got a check for $2.50 a couple years later. Firms like this disgust me. They disgust me too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyn7 Posted February 19, 2013 #22 Share Posted February 19, 2013 It's federal court. You need access to PACER. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Thanks for the info. I will have to see if any of my lawyer friends here have access. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OHCruiser Posted February 19, 2013 #23 Share Posted February 19, 2013 The lawyers who solicit for these class action suits are the scum of the earth. They know damn well that they'll reap the $$ while the "class" will get $25 vouchers--if they're lucky. I look forward to it not being certified and to all of them being dismissed. I hope that Carnival buries them under mountains of paperwork and expert reports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilmsmuffet Posted February 19, 2013 #24 Share Posted February 19, 2013 If that was him he looked like a two-bit ambulance chaser..I would be ashamed to have my name even associated with the likes of him..what a sad bunch to be following him..and I commend all the cruisers who can look back and know sometimes bad things just happen to good ppl..I think Carnival did the best they could at the time and I am sure they to have learned from this..God brought them all home safely.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyn7 Posted February 19, 2013 #25 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I won't begrudge any one who had been injured on this cruise or any cruise a fair settlement. From the reports, the only person I have heard of to this point, is the person who fell and broke her ankle that has a physical injury. I know this makes me sound mean; and I am not belittling what the passengers on the Triumph went through; but I hope all those who are just seeking to sue because they are sue happy and somebody "owes" them get nothing, not even what Carnival has offered and they are added to the "No Sail List" for all Carnival Corp. Cruise Lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.