Jota62 Posted January 21, 2015 #1 Share Posted January 21, 2015 I'm a novice photographer. I enjoy it as a hobby and would love to get some great shots in Alaska. I'm not sailing until September so have time to decide and practice to be used to any new lenses. I have a Cannon T3i and it came with a 18-35mm and theb I have a 50mm /1.8f that I love and use most of the time. Any suggestions for an affordable lens that will work well with my camera that would be great for capturing the glaciers and other great views from the boat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlxo Posted January 21, 2015 #2 Share Posted January 21, 2015 You might want to budget for a zoom lens to get the wildlife. I like 18-200mm which combines your wide and zoom. Image quality is not so great, but it makes it so much portable. This lens is a bargain until you can save up for the 70-200mm f/2.8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAHICK Posted January 22, 2015 #3 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Do a Google search for camera shops that rent lens. I have a Canon T4i and when I went to Yellowstone I rented a Canon 100 - 400 L Lens for about $140 for 2 weeks. Well worth it as lens costs over $2,000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4cats,1dog Posted January 22, 2015 #4 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I got amazing pictures with my Nikon 520 with 42X zoom. Automatic - no thinking. Just point and shoot. Also had manual mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grammyprf Posted January 22, 2015 #5 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I also am looking to purchase a new camera with better zoom. Nikon has a L830 and a p530...which has good reviews. Looking for point and shoot as I an an amateur and it's only a hobby. Anyone have any other ideas for my new camera? I got amazing pictures with my Nikon 520 with 42X zoom. Automatic - no thinking. Just point and shoot. Also had manual mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jota62 Posted January 22, 2015 Author #6 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Do a Google search for camera shops that rent lens. I have a Canon T4i and when I went to Yellowstone I rented a Canon 100 - 400 L Lens for about $140 for 2 weeks. Well worth it as lens costs over $2,000. I think my only concern is being stressed that something then would happen to the lens. I appreciate the suggestion and I am definitely going to look into this and the details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucky cal Posted January 22, 2015 #7 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I got amazing pictures with my Nikon 520 with 42X zoom. Automatic - no thinking. Just point and shoot. Also had manual mode. We are looking for a better camera in preparation for our July Alaska cruise and DIY land tour. I especially would like a good zoom in order to capture shots of wildlife on whale watching tours and in Denali National Park. But I would hate to fuss with changing lenses and lugging around a lot of gear. Your Nikon 520 sounds like it might be a great option. Did you shoot many long-distance photos of wildlife? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donaldsc Posted January 22, 2015 #8 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I think my only concern is being stressed that something then would happen to the lens. I appreciate the suggestion and I am definitely going to look into this and the details. I have rented before. All the rental places have an insurance option that you can take. DON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catr13 Posted January 22, 2015 #9 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I bought this recently for my canon http://www.eglobaldigitalcameras.com.au/tamron-16-300mm-f-3.5-6.3-di-ii-vc-pzd-macro-lenses.html Tamron 16-300mm, it's great as I never have to change lens as it goes from wide angle to telephoto and it's very light weight. I would have loved a canon 400mm but they are well over twice as much and more cumbersome to lug around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catr13 Posted January 22, 2015 #10 Share Posted January 22, 2015 (edited) You might want to budget for a zoom lens to get the wildlife. I like 18-200mm which combines your wide and zoom. Image quality is not so great, but it makes it so much portable. This lens is a bargain until you can save up for the 70-200mm f/2.8. I find 200mm not to be quite long enough for wildlife. I guess it depends on how much of a close up you want. Edited January 22, 2015 by catr13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare mskaufman Posted January 22, 2015 #11 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I went to AK with my Tamron 18 - 270 and was very happy. The introduction of the 16 - 300 has made the 18 - 270 more affordable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockdoctor Posted January 22, 2015 #12 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I use a 600mm four thirds lens. It is the size of a normal 300mm lens plus I have hand held it for pictures of Dahl Sheep and Grizzlies in Denali. Don't know if you can get four thirds lenses for Cannon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikirumata Posted January 22, 2015 #13 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I find 200mm not to be quite long enough for wildlife. I guess it depends on how much of a close up you want. I agree with this. I went to alaska with a 70-200 F4 (on my T2i) and I was wishing I had more. I was still able to get some good shots, but we went on a lot of small boat tours to get in closer (still, lots of digital zooming and cropping helped). eagle4 by ikirumata, on Flickr As far as glaciers, your 50mm would be good for that. Renting lenses is a good option if you don't want to pony up for a new/used one. 400mm seems to be about as big as I would want to lug around on an Alaskan cruise. Seems like anything bigger would either require a tripod or just be unwieldy on a small boat (or on a cruise ship with limited deck space). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAHICK Posted January 22, 2015 #14 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Jota62.....best part of the $140 was that Insurance was included!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jota62 Posted January 22, 2015 Author #15 Share Posted January 22, 2015 That's awesome. I will definitely check it out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAHICK Posted January 22, 2015 #16 Share Posted January 22, 2015 In June of 2016 we plan on going on HAL 14 Day RT from Seattle. Our 3rd trip to Alaska. I plan on renting the Canon L Lens 100 - 400. Agree it may be a little heavier than usual but the quality of shots taken with an L Lens far outweighs the weight. It was perfect in Yellowstone and Grand Tetons. I was able to get some awesome shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VermeulT Posted January 24, 2015 #17 Share Posted January 24, 2015 I went to AK with my Tamron 18 - 270 and was very happy. The introduction of the 16 - 300 has made the 18 - 270 more affordable. Definitely something to look at (for me). I was considering the Canon 75-300 Lens which I can get for about $200... but the one you mentioned has the wider angle without having to change lenses... Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlxo Posted January 24, 2015 #18 Share Posted January 24, 2015 Something to also consider with those zoom lenses.... VC/IS.... image stabilization. I am willing to pay more for image stabilized lenses for better sharpness in low light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DENNSDMNCE Posted January 25, 2015 #19 Share Posted January 25, 2015 I used three lenses on my Nikon D200 during my first cruise to Alaska. A 12-24, 70-300 f4.5-5.6, and my favorite 35 f1.8. The weather was spectacular with clear skies and brilliant sunsets. The wide angle was great for landscapes while the 35 was best for low light and walking around town. The 70-300 with VR worked reasonably well for whale watching and eagles but I still wished for a longer reach. This Spring I will be going on another cruise to Alaska but will be using a full frame camera with my old manual lenses. I don't know which yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare captain_hug99 Posted January 25, 2015 #20 Share Posted January 25, 2015 I think my only concern is being stressed that something then would happen to the lens. I appreciate the suggestion and I am definitely going to look into this and the details. I got the insurance for just this reason. I rented a wide angle lens when we went to the Grand Canyon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare mskaufman Posted January 25, 2015 #21 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Definitely something to look at (for me). I was considering the Canon 75-300 Lens which I can get for about $200... but the one you mentioned has the wider angle without having to change lenses...Thanks. Not changing lenses was the big sales point for me. For example, in Glacier Bay you might want a close up of an eagle hanging on a piece of ice and immediately go to wide angle for a glacier shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zqvol Posted January 27, 2015 #22 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Canon has a nice 70 -300 zoom that is a nice lens for your camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhmom99 Posted January 27, 2015 #23 Share Posted January 27, 2015 DH used a 17-40mm zoom lens, which works out pretty well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hard-habit-to-break Posted January 28, 2015 #24 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I agree with the Tamron 18-270mm. I bought that one just before we went yo Alaska last year and absolutely love it. Price was my thing, would have loved a canon but couldn't afford it. I live in Australia and was worried about trying to organise a rental. I am still very much learning how to use my camera to the best possible results and with the a Tamron I got some incredible pictures. I love my Canon 18-55mm that came with my camera but the Tamron is a fab walk around lens. The 18-300mm was released not long before I went away and I read very mixed reviews, so maybe check it out before committing to it. Very light and compact! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jota62 Posted January 28, 2015 Author #25 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I agree with the Tamron 18-270mm. I bought that one just before we went yo Alaska last year and absolutely love it. Price was my thing, would have loved a canon but couldn't afford it. I live in Australia and was worried about trying to organise a rental. I am still very much learning how to use my camera to the best possible results and with the a Tamron I got some incredible pictures. I love my Canon 18-55mm that came with my camera but the Tamron is a fab walk around lens. The 18-300mm was released not long before I went away and I read very mixed reviews, so maybe check it out before committing to it. Very light and compact! Thanks to you and everyone else for the great suggestions! I'm definitely going to research these lenses! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now