negc Posted May 7, 2006 #76 Share Posted May 7, 2006 That's okay guys... if you don't want to cruise it that could mean big discounts for me! I wonder with plans that far out if the name "genesis" isn't a code name or planning name, such that as the time draws near they can pick something more timely. For example "Liberty", "Freedom"... a theme for that class. JC I think it is more likely a planning name much as Ultra-Voyager, Advantage, and Eagle were project names for classes of ships which ultimately bore much different names. Once Freedom is in service we may begin to get some hints as to what will be new and different about the ships of the Genesis project besides their size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rachelandfamily Posted May 7, 2006 #77 Share Posted May 7, 2006 Would love to cruise (once past the 3 week check in process in Barcelona) on a Genesis class ship - even if just for the look on my kids faces when it pulls into port!!! My 8 year old watched the Freedom leave Finland with great excitement (i.e. when are we going mum??), Glad to see Royal Caribbean be the biggest and best. Rachel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayJay Posted May 11, 2006 #78 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Actually, the larger the ship the more money per passenger the cruise line makes. That is why the ships are getting bigger, not because the companies are making less per passenger. I see no difference whatsover in cruising a 70,000 ton ship vs. a 137,000 ship in terms of crowds or lines. RCCL seems to know what they are doing and do just fine accomodating passengers on the Voyager class ships. I see no reason why Genesis class ships won't follow suit. After all.........not much difference in size % change from 70,000 to 137,000 or 137,000 to 220,000. Seems this ship will be a reality in 2009. I for one can't wait to cruise on her. Go RCCL!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happy cruzer Posted May 11, 2006 #79 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Hey, I like the name Genesis. If you think about most of the names there is something negative. Empress, Princess, and Sovereign seem undemocratic. Ecstacy, Fantasy, and Conquest are a bit out there too... Some are hard to say Zuiderdam, OOOOOOsterdam The world can get a little too politically correct. Happy Cruzin!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltachi96 Posted May 11, 2006 #80 Share Posted May 11, 2006 So when can I book for it's first cruise. I am ready!!!!! Even the concept of being on something that big is just awesome!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one4cruisin Posted May 11, 2006 #81 Share Posted May 11, 2006 I'd be a little worried about cruising on a ship that size from a safety stand point. I mean they look so top heavy. Seems to me that you can only build so high and then you are risking a real "Posiden Adventure". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericknow32 Posted May 11, 2006 #82 Share Posted May 11, 2006 I'd be a little worried about cruising on a ship that size from a safety stand point. I mean they look so top heavy. Seems to me that you can only build so high and then you are risking a real "Posiden Adventure".It's not that much taller than the Voyager Class ships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EggDropErin Posted May 11, 2006 #83 Share Posted May 11, 2006 At the C&A reception, our captain spoke of ships that were already ordered that would hold 6500 people. Yikes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buchie614 Posted May 11, 2006 #84 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Bring it on. DH and I love the larger class of ships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FitzLA Posted May 11, 2006 #85 Share Posted May 11, 2006 At the C&A reception, our captain spoke of ships that were already ordered that would hold 6500 people. Yikes! Yes, that would be the Genesis class ship. You can get some info here. http://www.akerfinnyards.com/press.cfm?ID=260 http://www.akerfinnyards.com/image.cfm?i=175&s=m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruising89143 Posted May 12, 2006 #86 Share Posted May 12, 2006 It's not that much taller than the Voyager Class ships. Genesis will be three foot taller according to the Akers website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimikens Posted May 12, 2006 #87 Share Posted May 12, 2006 However, it is almost 100 feet longer at 1181 feet and 15 to 20 feet wider at 156 feet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikew0805 Posted May 13, 2006 #88 Share Posted May 13, 2006 hmmm would have to be wider than that, Freedom is 184' at its beam, according to the RCI website: Ship Facts Passenger Capacity: 3,634 double occupancy Godmother: Katherine Louise Calder Gross Tonnage: 160,000 Length: 1,112' Max Beam: 184' Draft: 28' Cruising Speed: 21.6 knots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twinmom38 Posted May 13, 2006 #89 Share Posted May 13, 2006 Imagine the elevators with that many people on board... not for me !!:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericknow32 Posted May 14, 2006 #90 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Imagine the elevators with that many people on board... not for me !!:pBut there will be more elevators to handle more people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalwhitt Posted May 14, 2006 #91 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Bring it on. DH and I love the larger class of ships. I'm with Buchie. If they build it ... I will go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimikens Posted May 14, 2006 #92 Share Posted May 14, 2006 hmmm would have to be wider than that, Freedom is 184' at its beam, according to the RCI website: Ship Facts Passenger Capacity: 3,634 double occupancy Godmother: Katherine Louise Calder Gross Tonnage: 160,000 Length: 1,112' Max Beam: 184' Draft: 28' Cruising Speed: 21.6 knots I'm sorry - in designing ports, we never refer to max beam (which is the flybridge width). We refer to beam in the water. The only bearing the fly bridge beam has is clearing perpendiculars. It doesn't help with stability. So, the RCI website is correct for max beam, but if you go to the Akers site, you will see that the (at water) beam for the FOS is less than GOS and is not 184'. You can estimate that the max beam of GOS would be 216. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.