gmarsh Posted May 16 #1 Share Posted May 16 https://phys.org/news/2024-03-panama-canal-averts-crisis.html This article summarizes the effects of conservation efforts, transits increasing but still below the usual of 38 ships per day. Official officials are expecting a good rainy season this year. Seems to me that smaller ships like us shouldn't have any problem with the transit. G 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare rafinmd Posted May 16 #2 Share Posted May 16 I'm not convinced a smaller ship uses less water, and in fact the opposite might be true. When a lock at the end level opens, a set amount of water is used, than I think some of the water involved is returned to the sea or the lake as the ship enters, returning some water to the ocean or to the lake, so a high displacement ship may actually save water. Still, I expect this is a relatively minor difference, and certainly good news about the coming season. Roy 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare ryndam Posted May 16 #3 Share Posted May 16 The Serenity is a true Panamax vessel. And a very tight fit. These photos are from our transit in January 2024. Rob 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWIVince Posted May 16 #4 Share Posted May 16 1 hour ago, rafinmd said: I'm not convinced a smaller ship uses less water, and in fact the opposite might be true. When a lock at the end level opens, a set amount of water is used, than I think some of the water involved is returned to the sea or the lake as the ship enters, returning some water to the ocean or to the lake, so a high displacement ship may actually save water. Still, I expect this is a relatively minor difference, and certainly good news about the coming season. Roy I've been trying to use that mental justification for years... The fatter I get, the more the displacement in the bathtub, the more water I'm conserving, the better for the environment. 😄 ...Or something like that. 😆 Vince 3 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenzSailing Posted May 17 #5 Share Posted May 17 3 hours ago, BWIVince said: I've been trying to use that mental justification for years... The fatter I get, the more the displacement in the bathtub, the more water I'm conserving, the better for the environment. 😄 ...Or something like that. 😆 Vince Ah, but one's buoyancy increases over time. Much safer that way. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgee Posted May 18 #6 Share Posted May 18 I learned on a recent Canal cruise that cruise ships pay for high priority due to a need to keep on schedule so shortages of fresh water to use in locks has, at least up to now, not had any effect on them. Improvement in water supply will benefit freighters which cruise through with lower priority, ...will not have to wait as long. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now