suznjune Posted September 15, 2014 #1 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Just received notice from HAL, thru TA that a passport is needed for our Panama Canal cruise that stops in Costa Rica, whether passenger goes ashore or not. This is a closed loop cruise FLL to FLL. Good thing my 82 yr old Mom has applied for her first passport.:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMLincoln Posted September 15, 2014 #2 Share Posted September 15, 2014 It's always a good thing to have passport in case of the unexpected. To paraphrase an old slogan, "Don't leave the country without one!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare richwmn Posted September 15, 2014 #3 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Just received notice from HAL, thru TA that a passport is needed for our Panama Canal cruise that stops in Costa Rica, whether passenger goes ashore or not. This is a closed loop cruise FLL to FLL. Good thing my 82 yr old Mom has applied for her first passport.:p Unless there has be a VERY recent change, someone dropped the ball here. I would check again - but then if you have a passport the information does not matter. It's always a good thing to have passport in case of the unexpected. To paraphrase an old slogan, "Don't leave the country without one!" While I agree that having a passport is preferred, I don't think the cruise referenced requires one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 15, 2014 #4 Share Posted September 15, 2014 (edited) It is possible it is not a U.S. or HAL rule, it could be a new Costa Rica rule. I have done that cruise several times in the past and though we had passports, we did not need them. Times have changed. Perhaps this is one of those changes? Edited September 15, 2014 by sail7seas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
momatibm Posted September 15, 2014 #5 Share Posted September 15, 2014 (edited) when we took a similar cruise this year, we also needed to have a passport to board. This is apparently a new requirement. Prior to this year, we didn't need a passport for the same cruise. Edited September 15, 2014 by momatibm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazy Kruizers Posted September 15, 2014 #6 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Zuiderdam We were looking at cruises and noticed that about the stop in Costa Rica. This is something new as we have done that cruise any never had to show our passport there. Get those passports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazy Kruizers Posted September 15, 2014 #7 Share Posted September 15, 2014 when we took a similar cruise this year, we also needed to have a passport to board. This is apparently a new requirement. Prior to this year, we didn't need a passport for the same cruise. Which ship and itinerary was that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PathfinderEss Posted September 15, 2014 #8 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Never hurts to get a passport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 15, 2014 #9 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Which ship and itinerary was that? I'm also interested which ship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 15, 2014 #10 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Which ship and itinerary was that? I'm also interested which ship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveOKC Posted September 16, 2014 #11 Share Posted September 16, 2014 I'm also interested which ship. I got the same notice at the time of booking and again last week. Zuiderdam PC cruise in Oct. DaveOKC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassyf Posted September 16, 2014 #12 Share Posted September 16, 2014 We had the same information forwarded by our travel agent. All FLL-FLL voyages visiting Costa Rica require a passport, whether planning to go ashore or not. We are sailing the Zuiderdam on October 27, 2014-Panama Canal Sunfarer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 16, 2014 #13 Share Posted September 16, 2014 I got the same notice at the time of booking and again last week. Zuiderdam PC cruise in Oct. DaveOKC We had the same information forwarded by our travel agent. All FLL-FLL voyages visiting Costa Rica require a passport, whether planning to go ashore or not. We are sailing the Zuiderdam on October 27, 2014-Panama Canal Sunfarer. Thanks. :) That's a wonderful cruise. We liked it so much we did it several times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare LAFFNVEGAS Posted September 16, 2014 #14 Share Posted September 16, 2014 We had the same information forwarded by our travel agent. All FLL-FLL voyages visiting Costa Rica require a passport, whether planning to go ashore or not. We are sailing the Zuiderdam on October 27, 2014-Panama Canal Sunfarer. This is true and actually went into effect almost 2 yrs ago. I now of people that had to get a rush passport about a year ago and I too was shocked and found where Costa Rico started to require it in early 2013. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundagger Posted September 16, 2014 #15 Share Posted September 16, 2014 CRUISE DETAILS Embark Date: Oct 17, 2014 Ship: Zuiderdam VISA NOTIFICATION: *****IMPORTANT INFORMATION***** Please be advised that a passport is required for all FLL-FLL voyages visiting Costa Rica whether they plan to go ashore or not. Each country has its own entry requirements, and guests assume personal responsibility for having the necessary documents when boarding. You may be denied boarding if you do not have the proper travel documents and in that case, you would not be entitled to a refund. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homosassa Posted September 16, 2014 #16 Share Posted September 16, 2014 Costa Rica has tighten up entry and exit requirements for tourists. Of special note for anyone traveling with children, Costa Rican officials will pay close attention to any children under the age of 16 and and will require any adults with them (parents included) that the adults have the legal right to enter and exit the country with the children. Luckily, this did not come as a surprise to a family that we met in June while on a tour in Costa Rica. The family, the parents and two sons (14 and 12), had proof of legal (parental) guardianship of the sons by the parents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarpeian Rock Posted September 16, 2014 #17 Share Posted September 16, 2014 Costa Rica has tighten up entry and exit requirements for tourists. Of special note for anyone traveling with children, Costa Rican officials will pay close attention to any children under the age of 16 and and will require any adults with them (parents included) that the adults have the legal right to enter and exit the country with the children. Luckily, this did not come as a surprise to a family that we met in June while on a tour in Costa Rica. The family, the parents and two sons (14 and 12), had proof of legal (parental) guardianship of the sons by the parents. Interesting. What kind of documentation constitutes "proof" of guardianship with respect to a married couple traveling with their biological children? Obviously in the case of post-divorce, or adoption, there are custodial agreements and related documents, but I haven't a clue how biological parents married to each other can "prove" guardianship of their own kids. Have never considered this before. Do such parents need to go to court to get a judge to declare that a couple has guardianship of their own children? A birth certificate alone wouldn't seem to prove such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 16, 2014 #18 Share Posted September 16, 2014 Interesting. What kind of documentation constitutes "proof" of guardianship with respect to a married couple traveling with their biological children? Obviously in the case of post-divorce, or adoption, there are custodial agreements and related documents, but I haven't a clue how biological parents married to each other can "prove" guardianship of their own kids. Have never considered this before. Do such parents need to go to court to get a judge to declare that a couple has guardianship of their own children? A birth certificate alone wouldn't seem to prove such. Birth certificates that have mom and dad's name on child's birth certificate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuthC Posted September 16, 2014 #19 Share Posted September 16, 2014 Birth certificates that have mom and dad's name on child's birth certificate. There is a difference between being a biological parent and a legal guardian, believe it or not. In my work we used to have to send parents to court to get legal guardianship of their own children in certain circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
internetwhiz Posted September 17, 2014 #20 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Hope other lines follow suit for all ports. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarpeian Rock Posted September 17, 2014 #21 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Birth certificates that have mom and dad's name on child's birth certificate. Not necessarily. Say a grandparent successfully sues for guardianship in a case where the biological parents prove to be incapable, abusive, etc. The biological parents can grab the birth certificate and flee the jurisdiction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 17, 2014 #22 Share Posted September 17, 2014 (edited) Interesting. What kind of documentation constitutes "proof" of guardianship with respect to a married couple traveling with their biological children? Obviously in the case of post-divorce, or adoption, there are custodial agreements and related documents, but I haven't a clue how biological parents married to each other can "prove" guardianship of their own kids. Have never considered this before. Do such parents need to go to court to get a judge to declare that a couple has guardianship of their own children? A birth certificate alone wouldn't seem to prove such. There is a difference between being a biological parent and a legal guardian, believe it or not. In my work we used to have to send parents to court to get legal guardianship of their own children in certain circumstances. Yes, of course, there is a difference but the question asks about "biological children" as indicated by the bold underline I inserted. Edited September 17, 2014 by sail7seas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted September 17, 2014 #23 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Not necessarily. Say a grandparent successfully sues for guardianship in a case where the biological parents prove to be incapable, abusive, etc. The biological parents can grab the birth certificate and flee the jurisdiction. Yes. That could happen and so could many other unfortunate events. However, in the vast majority of cases, what would you suggest would be the obvious 'proof'? The scenario you present is against the law. So is bank robbery. You cannot protect against all law breakers or we wouldn't need jails and courts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homosassa Posted September 17, 2014 #24 Share Posted September 17, 2014 In response about the proof, besides the passports, the parents had the birth certificates on which they were named, and the two boys were each questioned individually,separately from his brother and parents, on who they were traveling with. Leaving the country (at the airport), there was separate security line for anyone traveling with a child. Same procedure as upon entering the country. I was curious so I asked if the same scrutiny was given to cruise ship passengers, in reply the security officer pointed to the sign that was posted around the airport that Costa Rica was concerned about their country's children and special security procedures were in place for their protection. He said it is the same for any entry and exit from the country by any means of travel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuthC Posted September 17, 2014 #25 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Yes, of course, there is a difference but the question asks about "biological children" as indicated by the boldunderline I inserted. Giving birth does not make you the "legal guardian" of a child. To be a "legal guardian" there is a court order naming you such. If parents truly need to prove they are the "legal guardians" of a child, then they would need that court order. In most instances of daily life such is not necessary, but when traveling to other countries it's important that parents learn, and follow, the rules of the countries they are visiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now