Rare MicCanberra Posted January 29, 2016 #26 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Far from the truth and certainly not what I have seen. Sophisticated, well travelled and all ages is what I found. If you want old , Princess Australia beats them hands down. I do agree though that those who had to jump out of the tender and wade ashore would not be ...shall we say ..athletic., but that would apply to just about all cruisers. Agreed, although some are quite athletic as they are really good at queue jumping.:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newfarmers Posted January 30, 2016 #27 Share Posted January 30, 2016 From reading the two Amsterdam blogs people left belongings behind on the tender if they elected to wade ashore. There would have been no reason for anyone to get anything wet unless they chose to take the risk. Regarding HAL being retirement homes at sea - we've tried quite a few lines now (just got Pacific Aria) and although the average age on our Rotterdam cruise was older they were worldy and interesting. Princess average was just as old and far less worldly. So, so different to the bogans we encountered on our Sun Princess (yep, old people and bogans :)) and Aria cruises - no hideous line dancing by the pool, thongs and t-shirts in the dining room. Each to their own... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted January 30, 2016 #28 Share Posted January 30, 2016 From reading the two Amsterdam blogs people left belongings behind on the tender if they elected to wade ashore. There would have been no reason for anyone to get anything wet unless they chose to take the risk. Regarding HAL being retirement homes at sea - we've tried quite a few lines now (just got Pacific Aria) and although the average age on our Rotterdam cruise was older they were worldy and interesting. Princess average was just as old and far less worldly. So, so different to the bogans we encountered on our Sun Princess (yep, old people and bogans :)) and Aria cruises - no hideous line dancing by the pool, thongs and t-shirts in the dining room. Each to their own... They could at least wear pants.:eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted January 30, 2016 #29 Share Posted January 30, 2016 They could at least wear pants.:eek: That doesn't bear thinking about. :eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSWP Posted January 30, 2016 #30 Share Posted January 30, 2016 (edited) From reading the two Amsterdam blogs people left belongings behind on the tender if they elected to wade ashore. There would have been no reason for anyone to get anything wet unless they chose to take the risk. Regarding HAL being retirement homes at sea - we've tried quite a few lines now (just got Pacific Aria) and although the average age on our Rotterdam cruise was older they were worldy and interesting. Princess average was just as old and far less worldly. So, so different to the bogans we encountered on our Sun Princess (yep, old people and bogans :)) and Aria cruises - no hideous line dancing by the pool, thongs and t-shirts in the dining room. Each to their own... Old people and Bogans, I like the combo. But you get some of those on most cruises, irrespective of the Line. Getting back HAL, I believe in the USA the super dinosaurs are more prominent on the HAL ships. No I have not cruised HAL, but been to many ports in the world where I have seen HAL ships and their cargo, inc USA/Canada, South America, Europe/The Med. etc, etc. Edited January 30, 2016 by NSWP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newfarmers Posted January 30, 2016 #31 Share Posted January 30, 2016 They could at least wear pants.:eek: hahahahahahaha!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSWP Posted January 30, 2016 #32 Share Posted January 30, 2016 They could at least wear pants.:eek: And undies, not those 'thong' things, oh you mean 'flip flops' or Chinese safety boots? newfarmers LOL. When you mention 'Thongs' to people from overseas they get embarrassed. If you know what I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted January 30, 2016 #33 Share Posted January 30, 2016 And undies, not those 'thong' things, oh you mean 'flip flops' or Chinese safety boots? newfarmers LOL. When you mention 'Thongs' to people from overseas they get embarrassed. If you know what I mean. Yep, that is why you should always use the term with Americans, you get the best reactions.:cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Big_M Posted January 30, 2016 #34 Share Posted January 30, 2016 From reading the two Amsterdam blogs people left belongings behind on the tender if they elected to wade ashore. There would have been no reason for anyone to get anything wet unless they chose to take the risk. The things most likely to be damaged are things like electronics, including phones, that people would also probably not want to take the risk of leaving behind. Stuff gets lost, or may be damaged by poor handling so leaving it onboard also presents a risk, and some may have wanted things on hand like cameras and phones as well. So it's quite a reasonable expectation for people to take things with them - and not that they're just "taking a risk" by doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newfarmers Posted January 30, 2016 #35 Share Posted January 30, 2016 The things most likely to be damaged are things like electronics, including phones, that people would also probably not want to take the risk of leaving behind. Stuff gets lost, or may be damaged by poor handling so leaving it onboard also presents a risk, and some may have wanted things on hand like cameras and phones as well. So it's quite a reasonable expectation for people to take things with them - and not that they're just "taking a risk" by doing so. Possibly on a P&O/Princess/RCL/Carnival/Celebrity Pacific seven day cruise people wouldn't 'risk leaving things behind' because they might get 'lost' but this is a world cruise where many are repeat guests and the crew are hand-picked. I also understand people might 'want' to take camera/phone with them - I've been to Raro twice and I know how beautiful it is - but if they are advised not to then it is at 'their own risk'. Just like wearing a fancy watch in some parts of Europe or South America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted January 31, 2016 #36 Share Posted January 31, 2016 This is why I travel with a waterproof bag for tender trips.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now