MamaFej

We are on an Internet forum catering to people who can afford to cruise and have the time to read and post about it. Any concern conveyed here is a First World Problem. We here are First World residents. There’s nothing wrong with that. Your concerns are entirely valid. We are also people who care about the wonderful, hard-working folks from developing nations who do so much to make our First World traveling experiences fantastically memorable. When the First World executives in Miami make decisions that deteriorate the onboard experience, especially those that have to do with tipping, it doesn’t just serve to move folks higher up in the Captains Club along to upmarket or other lines, it likely serves to reduce the amount of tip money the amazing crew receive. It also almost surely serves to make sure that crew members get berated for decisions they have no control over. I imagine we’ve all seen crew treated disrespectfully or worse by passengers. Some of us have immediately and vocally stood up for those crew when the passengers are particularly obnoxious. I hope I’m wrong in surmising that crew are in for some rough times ahead.

@zitsky, I think you missed the post before yours as it is on the previous page. My experience has been the same. And the 20 year Taylor's Tawny can be hard to find. I really miss the Tokaji!

It has nothing to do with the onboard experience, but it appears that Celebrity has also cut their advertising photo graphics editing budget. We're supposed to believe that this tail appeared without any disturbance to the surrounding water? Maybe it's just a fluke. I know, I know... go sit in the corner and think about what I've done.

Aloha! Thanks for the reminder. We just checked in. Celebrity does have some truly awesome crew members!

In the past, people have come to this board with requests to "Tell me about Celebrity" when they were considering booking with X for the first time. Lots of helpful people gave helpful answers. Celebrity is the line I've sailed with the most, and my answer to them, as well as to IRL friends who would ask, was that Celebrity was "Classy without being stuffy." It was a little upscale without being over the top. Food was good, service was very good, but not overbearing. It was an excellent fit for us. However, with increasing prices and decreasing quality and services to all but the highest suites (which are selling at prices that make my eyes water) I feel that a more appropriate current response would be that Celebrity is "Stuffy without being classy." I am not in any way saying that those who are sailing in those higest suites are stuffy, I'm only saying this is the feeling Celebrity is giving me. This is about X, not their customers.

Thanks, I figured that was the case. I should have made it clearer that I was referring to the earlier post that said that kettles are for British citizens.

And one does not have to be a "UK citizen" to enjoy tea. The idea that kettles are only provided to UK citizens seems more than a bit off-putting.

If they call to you, it would be downright rude to ignore them. Manners are important.

I think you've hit on somehting important here, Ken. Cruisers would be wise, going forward, to compare what is, not what was. The question for purposes of this forum, then, is: why wouldn't Celebrity want to make sure what is is better for their target market than what their competitors are offering, and why wouldn't Celebrity want to make sure what is is consistent from booking time to sailing time? Unless, of course, they are seeking an endless series of one and done customers rather than repeat ones.

That's what it feels like to me: sleight of hand. "Hey, everybody, look over here!" Meanwhile, raise the prices at Sushi on Five or somewhere/something else while everyone is distracted. Ugh. I hate being so cynical. I wish Celebrity would stop giving me reasons to feel this way.

And people who lack the emotional and/or intellectual capacity to scroll on by things that don't interest them will complain about the thread, thereby perpetuating it.

Maybe, just be prepared for the retroactive 20% gratuity. Have that $7 handy. Each.

I now have an image of Hugh Hefner in his pajamas in my head. Just what I needed. Not.

I hope you are correct. Those poor folks have a fairly dull time until the last two days, when folks suddenly remember: Oh! I need to go get my "free" gelato!

Sadly, the excitement added to their shift will likely come from rude passengers berating them for a policy they had absolutely nothing to do with devising.

Celebrity took away our 2024 overnight in Singapore to "enhance" our cruise experience. I'm hoping they don't take docking in Singapore away from David and his cruise mates, instead making them tender (or swim) to the ship.

I think if you read through this thread and others about concerns with the changing product, elimination of previous inclusions, and unexpected charges, you'll see who those folks are. My observations: Many people don't like it, but understand and begrudgingly support raising cruise fares while keeping the product the same. Some people don't like it, but understand and begrudgingly support lowering quality and charging extra for previous inclusions, while keeping the cruise fares the same. A few people are big fans of lowering quality and charging for previous inclusions, while simultaneously raising prices. Different people look at the same situation differently.

That's one of my favorite things about cruising with a group, including family. You can "be together" without "BEING TOGETHER!!!!" Having breaks from one another makes the communal times more special without being overwhelming.

Over and over again, I'm seeing words like "Trust," "Credibility," and "Reputation" being mentioned on these boards, and not in a positive way. Time will tell if the short-term money grabs will outweigh the loss of dependability for those who used to be repeat customers.

Exactly! It doesn't seem to matter how many times the hosts tell us it's okay to mention Facebook, we just can't promote their groups, people will continue to claim that we can't.

Indeed. "May be" "might be" "speculate..." That's not anything close to resembling actual reporting. Someone basically summarized this thread (and what Hubby says is on Facebook) and is getting paid for each view. I'm guilty of contributing. Oh, well, the author can probably afford a more than a few cookies on their next cruise.

I don't see anything in the listing to indicate that. Some of the reviews mention hanging shopping bags from the handles. I do recall that there were versions with and without the smal seat. It's certainly not a comfortable seat, as some walkers have, since it collapses so small. It did work for my son for the times he needed it between wheelchair or seat times. The seat on this walker is more for leaning, as seen in the photo, than for actual, comfortable sitting.

$11.95 +20%. You forgot to include the cost of the cookie. I never had a craving during any of my preganacies that was worth $14.34 $14.27, maybe, but certainly not $14.24.

Extra Special Posters