arxcards

Maybe this is what they are investigating. Much more fun on Carnival Magic 😂 60-Person Brawl on Cruise Ship Erupts Due to Alleged Threesome (msn.com)

The above is 99% correct. If you are vaccinated, you are free to do your own tours. Currently, if you are cruising from Australia, you are required to be vaccinated, or have an approved medical exemption for being at risk of vaccination. If you have one of those exemptions, you can only do approved ship tours. From the relevant question on Princess' Australian FAQ: https://www.princess.com/plan/cruise-with-confidence/cruise-health/frequently-asked-questions/au-cruises/ What requirements are in place to go ashore for guests who have been approved for a vaccination exemption? For guests aged 12 years and older, you may not be permitted ashore in all ports and, if allowed, may only go ashore through shore excursions sold by or through Princess using tour operators who comply with our COVID-19 protocols. Self-exploration or participation in shore excursions not sold through or operated by Princess will not be permitted. Children under 12 who are not fully vaccinated will be permitted to participate in independent shore activities alongside their fully vaccinated parents/guardians.

The passengers shouldn't be too sad about not being in Newcastle today. The weather has been 99% miserable.

To have restricted karaoke in old folks homes was outrageous 😉

Yes, If you test positive after disembarking, you need to report your positive test, the same as catching it anywhere else. Your result is not linked to a location where you think you contracted the bug. As it is with the local pub, there is no contract tracing of your result. Once disembarked, you are no longer at risk of passing it on to anyone aboard the ship, and the ship numbers are gathered purely to determine the risk of an outbreak on the ship. That is why the health authorities are only interested on those that have tested positive onboard.

No, but I think it will the ship will need to return to port and remain there until it is no longer red. Disembarking the passengers takes care of one part as soon as they have departed and the ship is hosed out. If it is related to crew numbers, then they would go through their isolation and testing until it is low enough to resume. The most likely scenario to go into code red, is that there is insufficient crew (numbers or key roles affected) to maintain the safe operation of the ship, hotel or medical facilities. Red = "There are a lot of cases on board (100 or more positive cases per 1,000 people) and/or the vessel is unable to maintain critical services due to staffing or resource shortages."

Deleted. Wrong wormhole

Just remember to smile and wave to the cameras when you disembark tomorrow, or are you staying on for the 2nd leg of the split cruise? We have a couple of cruise friends aboard, and they are having a great time on their first cruise back too.

I hope you are having a great time.

They took Newcastle off them a few weeks ago. This is the cruise that was split into 2 x shorter ones. The extra turnaround day in Brisbane wiped Newcastle off the southern part of the itinerary. Good thing though. We don't want those petri dishes in Newcastle 😉😂

Unsure. If they need medical treatment, they would be looked after ashore. As they have no residence to go to, I am pretty sure they would be isolated on the ship vs a quarantine facility ashore - they would have already been disembarked at the end of the previous cruise if that was the chosen option. I am pretty sure they don't have to remain aboard, but can resume duties the same say they become negative if they are still on the ship. Yes, code red would be a shocker, but tough to hit on a short cruise. If key personnel are infected, that can also trigger a code red based on being unable to provide critical services. The bridge team are very socially distant with the rest of the crew and passengers for that reason, but the ships' medical team is on the front line of it all.

Let me know how it goes. I think I will be washing my hair then.

Also the code amber was for the previous cruise, and this one wont be determined until the new infections/still infected are reported on Friday. Hopefully the numbers are lower.

It was sold out, but all passengers were offered the chance to be refunded if they had concerns about the elevated levels of covid. There would have been some takers, but I am thinking not 4 or 5 hundred.

The issues about infections goes back to the previous cruise, where I believe there is a post in this thread saying that the passengers next door were sick, then they got sick. Maybe I misread that bit. Those sick passengers were isolating in their cabin, as the dedicated area was full, presumably of crew. I think the only reason as many as 10 have tested positive is that they were required to test to disembark in Eden and Sydney. If the cruise wasn't on amber status, most of them wouldn't have tested at all. It is only Wednesday, and all of those 10 should have been healthy on Saturday. If everything is working, the numbers should still be low when they return to Brisbane. I am curious if QLD health also wants them to test before disembarking. Apart from this blip, the protocols are all working. It is only about preventing an outbreak, not keeping the ship covid free. As the crew serve their isolation period, hopefully all the numbers drop over the next few days and we can resume a normal course.

Or Uncle Xi Jinping?

Yes.

While not essential because of their desalination unit, they usually fill up on fresh water in Noumea. They also have good access to general ship services, such as any specialised maintenance and materials. I like Noumea, as there is always something a bit different to do. It is more about calling there nearly every time you head into the Pacific, knowing there are other island stops that you don't get to stop at often. You also get the feeling that away from the market area and tourist spots, that most locals don't really want you there.

How can one be expected to shake their own martini!

We have a much higher standard of journalism in the Hunter. Backed by plenty of investigative journalism, covid is no longer the number 1 concern to the residents of Newcastle, with a much more dangerous outbreak exceeding the daily covid numbers. Check out The Daily Blue - they haven't picked on cruising .... yet.

The HEPA filters are a work in progress, and as mentioned there, are fitted in key areas of the medical centre and isolation rooms. That works great until passengers are told to isolate in their cabins, as was the case last week when the isolation rooms were full of crew members.

I wonder if our cricketers are hitching a lift back from Sri Lanka? Also spotting that Sapphire Princess is entering the Suez. She was supposed to be spending some time in WA, but is now being deployed to LA for some Mexican Riviera itineraries in September.

Pity the Quay West cam is no longer working

As long as Liz Hayes doesn't quote your figures, we will let it slide. And for all you future cruise passengers that have repeatedly wanted the covid numbers published for each cruise - the past two days is what you get when there are numbers out there. It didn't need 118, they would have fired-up if they knew there was as much as 10. They have been hiding in the shadows waiting for a number to pin to their story.

Yeah, nah. Bit like