Rich_NY Posted August 21, 2017 #1 Share Posted August 21, 2017 We just cruised on the Victory. We met someone on the ship whose neice and nephew had their birth certificates in their checked luggage. When they found the luggage the ship had left. They got charged $300 per person to get on in Key West. To me that seems ridiculous.....they already paid, incurred stress, and extra costs. This doesn't seem right to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ocean Dancer Posted August 21, 2017 #2 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Whether they were charged or not, why would anyone put their ID in their checked luggage?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich_NY Posted August 21, 2017 Author #3 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Whether they were charged or not, why would anyone put their ID in their checked luggage?? Thats not the point.....they messed up.....I assume it was accidental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purvis1231 Posted August 21, 2017 #4 Share Posted August 21, 2017 (edited) There are some strange federal laws related to change of embarkation ports. Call your congressman about this one. See 2e of the cruise contract. Edited August 21, 2017 by Purvis1231 typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meatloafsfan Posted August 21, 2017 #5 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Because it was a different US port, they had to pay a fine under the Passenger act (often mistaken as the Jones act). Why should Carnival pay the US government fine for their passengers error? Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swscruiser Posted August 21, 2017 #6 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Because you can not join a cruise that has left from another U S port at another U S Port on a closed loop cruise and If Carnival or any Cruise line allows this to happen they will be fined by Gov't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beachbum6264 Posted August 21, 2017 #7 Share Posted August 21, 2017 It's not Carnival - it's the Passenger Services Act - something about foreign flagged vessels not being allowed to transport passengers from one US port to another US port without a stop in a distant foreign port without incurring a large (there's the $300) fine. If the Cozumel stop had been first there wouldn't have been a fine. It's just because the 1st port was Key West. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pms4104 Posted August 21, 2017 #8 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Perhaps this was a gov't mandated fine to waive the PVSA rules ... further, since they no longer were on a closed loop cruise, they are lucky to have been able to board with a BC and without a passport. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320A using Forums mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich_NY Posted August 21, 2017 Author #9 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Thanks for clarifying....I was wondering why they charged them almost $1000 (3 people) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdGuyMG Posted August 21, 2017 #10 Share Posted August 21, 2017 It has nothing to do with Birth Certificates in their luggage. The $300 per person fine was being passed along to the passengers for putting the cruise line in violation of the PSVA. The PSVA prohibits foreign flagged vessels such as the Victory from transporting people from 1 United States port to a different United States port with out stopping at a " Distant Foreign Port." Here in the US on the East Coast the closest Distant Foreign Ports are typically the ABC Islands of Aruba/Bonaire/Curacao or Cartegena Colombia. A round trip "closed loop" cruise is exempt from this. The ship only has to visit a foreign port. So typical 3/4 day trip on the Victory like Miami>Bahamas>Miami or Miami>Key West>Cozumel Mexico>Miami is fine. But by getting on the ship in Key West and getting off the ship at the end of the cruise in Miami, the passengers were transported from 1 US city to a different US city without the distant foreign port visit. So just like Government Fees, Port Expenses and Taxes that are passed along when paying the cruise fare, the PSVA fine is passed along, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich_NY Posted August 21, 2017 Author #11 Share Posted August 21, 2017 It has nothing to do with Birth Certificates in their luggage. The $300 per person fine was being passed along to the passengers for putting the cruise line in violation of the PSVA. The PSVA prohibits foreign flagged vessels such as the Victory from transporting people from 1 United States port to a different United States port with out stopping at a " Distant Foreign Port." Here in the US on the East Coast the closest Distant Foreign Ports are typically the ABC Islands of Aruba/Bonaire/Curacao or Cartegena Colombia. A round trip "closed loop" cruise is exempt from this. The ship only has to visit a foreign port. So typical 3/4 day trip on the Victory like Miami>Bahamas>Miami or Miami>Key West>Cozumel Mexico>Miami is fine. But by getting on the ship in Key West and getting off the ship at the end of the cruise in Miami, the passengers were transported from 1 US city to a different US city without the distant foreign port visit. So just like Government Fees, Port Expenses and Taxes that are passed along when paying the cruise fare, the PSVA fine is passed along, too. Based on what you wrote, they were getting on in Key West, went to Mexico (Cozumel), then Miami....why is that no good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamloops50 Posted August 21, 2017 #12 Share Posted August 21, 2017 We just cruised on the Victory. We met someone on the ship whose neice and nephew had their birth certificates in their checked luggage. When they found the luggage the ship had left. They got charged $300 per person to get on in Key West. To me that seems ridiculous.....they already paid, incurred stress, and extra costs. This doesn't seem right to me. They contravened the PVSA law. Under this law foreign flagged carriers can't carry passengers between two US ports without visiting a foreign port. If they where on a closed their boarding was illegal. the $300 is what the goverment fines the cruiseline and they just charge the passengers involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coevan Posted August 21, 2017 #13 Share Posted August 21, 2017 We just cruised on the Victory. We met someone on the ship whose neice and nephew had their birth certificates in their checked luggage. When they found the luggage the ship had left. They got charged $300 per person to get on in Key West. To me that seems ridiculous.....they already paid, incurred stress, and extra costs. This doesn't seem right to me. Sorry, but I'm not following. did they fly to the port? Did they bring the bags to the ship? Wouldn't the luggage been on the carousel at the airport, or if they drove in the trunk of the car. What do you mean "when they found the luggage" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ocean Dancer Posted August 21, 2017 #14 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Sorry, but I'm not following. did they fly to the port? Did they bring the bags to the ship? Wouldn't the luggage been on the carousel at the airport, or if they drove in the trunk of the car. What do you mean "when they found the luggage" I'm guessing that the luggage was handed over to a porter at the ship. When they went to check in, they did not have the necessary ID. When their luggage was found, the ship had departed with the luggage. They were very lucky that they did not have to fly to Cozumel as they would have needed a passport. Getting to Key West, they needed nothing if they drove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich_NY Posted August 21, 2017 Author #15 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Sorry, but I'm not following. did they fly to the port? Did they bring the bags to the ship? Wouldn't the luggage been on the carousel at the airport, or if they drove in the trunk of the car. What do you mean "when they found the luggage" The bags were checked onto the ship. The Aunt who we met searched for the bags on the ship already which had her neice and nephews passports in the luggage. A few family members were cruising. The Sister was on the ship with her husband....the other sister and her kids had to get on in Key West. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coevan Posted August 21, 2017 #16 Share Posted August 21, 2017 but, the luggage was ON the ship, did they get to the ship 1/2 hour before departure? Sorry but this makes no sense. Get an officer or security person, and retrieve the luggage. Most people arrive several hours early. This is why we never leave U.S. soil without a passport which is either in my computer bag or my wife's purse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare BlerkOne Posted August 21, 2017 #17 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Based on what you wrote, they were getting on in Key West, went to Mexico (Cozumel), then Miami....why is that no good? In that case, it would have had to be a distant foreign port - like in another hemisphere. Cozumel would not count. Aruba would. Or they could have flown to, and boarded in Mexico and there would not have been a fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perditax Posted August 21, 2017 #18 Share Posted August 21, 2017 They contravened the PVSA law. Under this law foreign flagged carriers can't carry passengers between two US ports without visiting a foreign port. If they where on a closed their boarding was illegal. the $300 is what the goverment fines the cruiseline and they just charge the passengers involved. It looks like this intierary goes Miami > KW > Cozumel > Miami. So even if they got on in KW, they still visited a foreign port (Mexico) before going back to Miami. So I don't think the PVSA applies. (I know people are enjoying feeling superior over people making mistakes with their ID, but I don't think the $300 fee has actually been explained yet.) Edit: so going from Miami to Cozumel counts, but going from Key West (in the same state) doesn't count? That sounds like some arbitrary law-making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ocean Dancer Posted August 21, 2017 #19 Share Posted August 21, 2017 It looks like this intierary goes Miami > KW > Cozumel > Miami. So even if they got on in KW, they still visited a foreign port (Mexico) before going back to Miami. So I don't think the PVSA applies. (I know people are enjoying feeling superior over people making mistakes with their ID, but I don't think the $300 fee has actually been explained yet.) Edit: so going from Miami to Cozumel counts, but going from Key West (in the same state) doesn't count? That sounds like some arbitrary law-making. Because the ship left from and returned to Miami. The three other passengers did not, so their cruise was not a closed loop and went under different laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coevan Posted August 21, 2017 #20 Share Posted August 21, 2017 "I know people are enjoying feeling superior over people making mistakes with their ID" It's not superior it's being responsible. I still contend the scenario makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perditax Posted August 21, 2017 #21 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Because the ship left from and returned to Miami. The three other passengers did not, so their cruise was not a closed loop and went under different laws. Ah ok, got it now. The emphasis on "foreign port" got me. Thanks. So the problem isn't a lack of foreign port, but rather that they didn't return to the same US port they departed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ocean Dancer Posted August 21, 2017 #22 Share Posted August 21, 2017 "I know people are enjoying feeling superior over people making mistakes with their ID" It's not superior it's being responsible. I still contend the scenario makes no sense. They were no longer on a closed loop cruise. By not having proper ID to board, they were forced to leave from a different port, not Miami where they returned to. Different laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ocean Dancer Posted August 21, 2017 #23 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Ah ok, got it now. The emphasis on "foreign port" got me. Thanks. So the problem isn't a lack of foreign port, but rather that they didn't return to the same US port they departed. Correct! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpdog42 Posted August 21, 2017 #24 Share Posted August 21, 2017 They contravened the PVSA law. Under this law foreign flagged carriers can't carry passengers between two US ports without visiting a foreign port. If they where on a closed their boarding was illegal. the $300 is what the goverment fines the cruiseline and they just charge the passengers involved. Have you been on Carnival Yet??? mpdog42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sh1035 Posted August 21, 2017 #25 Share Posted August 21, 2017 I would of taken that $900 and rented a car, driven the keys and have fun with family for the day, then spent the balance on a fun keys and Miami trip. Problem solved! Plus being the off season car rentals and hotels are cheap. I'd rather drive down 7 mile bridge, etc then take a boat. Plus you don't have to leave before sunset! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now