qsuzi Posted February 25, 2015 #1 Share Posted February 25, 2015 (edited) Per a Yahoo article, Congress is trying to determine how to fund the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) before the agency runs out of money Friday. The article takes a by-the-numbers look at how a shutdown could affect DHS workers, as well as the day-to-day operations of some of the country’s most visible agencies, including the Transportation Security Administration, Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Potential effect on cruisers include: ----200,000 (projected) overall number of DHS workers who would continue to do their jobs without pay in the event of a shutdown. A full quarter of that number — more than 50,000 workers — would be TSA security agents tasked with screening air travelers across the country. ----40,000 — Customs and Border Protection employees would work without pay, as would 13,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Edited February 25, 2015 by qsuzi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavecreekguy Posted February 25, 2015 #2 Share Posted February 25, 2015 I was reading about this earlier. I wonder what all this will mean in the airports. What kind of sense of urgency will all those agents who aren't getting paid have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare POA1 Posted February 25, 2015 #3 Share Posted February 25, 2015 The employees receive deferred (back) pay when the funding agreement is reached. The same thing happened last time. A lot of the articles are written to make it sound like people are losing pay. While it sucks to go without pay for a period of time, it's good to know that they'll get their back pay after the funding impasse is settled. I cannot figure out why that fact is almost never mentioned in any of the articles. Reporting is getting to the point where I'm amazed they even get the sports scores right. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PathfinderEss Posted February 25, 2015 #4 Share Posted February 25, 2015 The employees receive deferred (back) pay when the funding agreement is reached. The same thing happened last time. A lot of the articles are written to make it sound like people are losing pay. While it sucks to go without pay for a period of time, it's good to know that they'll get their back pay after the funding impasse is settled. I cannot figure out why that fact is almost never mentioned in any of the articles. Reporting is getting to the point where I'm amazed they even get the sports scores right. ;) I'll drink to that.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wander Posted February 25, 2015 #5 Share Posted February 25, 2015 POA1 - you are correct about the backpay in the past. BUT, as a retired government employee I can tell you that providing back pay IS NO AUTOMATIC NOR REQUIRED. So, each time we had to work without pay (or be put on leave without pay), we never could be sure what congress would do about that. To provide back pay - it had to be voted in. Despite the history of providing the back pay (probably 4-5 times in my career), it made folks nervous. Regarding the impact on the workers.I do not know about the TSA, but in my experience with hospital employees - care levels did NOT suffer during no pay times where I worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare Gail & Marty sailing away Posted February 25, 2015 #6 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Does not sound good... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cruise Posted February 25, 2015 #7 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Good luck to the cruise lines if customs clearance gets any slower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhannah Posted February 25, 2015 #8 Share Posted February 25, 2015 They can economize by dropping half of the TSA force and conducting only REASONABLE security screenings at airports. So much of what they do is smoke and mirrors. A huge waste of money IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquahound Posted February 25, 2015 #9 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Much ado about nothing. The way the pay periods are set up, DHS workers will continue to get paid through March 16. The March 16 paycheck would be for the hours worked through Feb 27. I'm sure they will have figured something out by then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qsuzi Posted February 25, 2015 Author #10 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Much ado about nothing. The way the pay periods are set up, DHS workers will continue to get paid through March 16. The March 16 paycheck would be for the hours worked through Feb 27. I'm sure they will have figured something out by then. There has been some positive movement on this issue to support your optimism. Thanks for your information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qsuzi Posted February 25, 2015 Author #11 Share Posted February 25, 2015 They can economize by dropping half of the TSA force and conducting only REASONABLE security screenings at airports. So much of what they do is smoke and mirrors. A huge waste of money IMO. Why do you say smoke and mirrors and REASONABLE security screenings? I only fly about 4 times a year but it does seem there are many just standing around and too few checking ID before going through screening. There are really long lines at SEA Tac because of TSA related issues for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qsuzi Posted February 25, 2015 Author #12 Share Posted February 25, 2015 (edited) Good luck to the cruise lines if customs clearance gets any slower. Where have you had this issue? We are wondering how it will be at Vancouver but based on the airport website it looks like they are modernized. Edited February 25, 2015 by qsuzi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhannah Posted February 25, 2015 #13 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Why do you say smoke and mirrors and REASONABLE security screenings? TSA/FAA tests conducted at major airports around the country have shown that weapons can make it through and get on aircraft. All the hoopla surrounding TSA screening is no guarantee.http://www.wired.com/2014/08/study-shows-how-easily-weapons-can-be-smuggled-past-tsas-x-ray-body-scanners/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbisailsolo Posted February 25, 2015 #14 Share Posted February 25, 2015 not gonna happen... they wont shut it down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qsuzi Posted February 25, 2015 Author #15 Share Posted February 25, 2015 (edited) TSA/FAA tests conducted at major airports around the country have shown that weapons can make it through and get on aircraft. All the hoopla surrounding TSA screening is no guarantee.http://www.wired.com/2014/08/study-shows-how-easily-weapons-can-be-smuggled-past-tsas-x-ray-body-scanners/ I see what you mean. I now don't have to go through the x ray body scanners but previously every time I went through them it showed multiple areas that turned out to be nothing because there was nothing.:D Edited February 25, 2015 by qsuzi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisoxfan Posted March 2, 2015 #16 Share Posted March 2, 2015 I was reading about this earlier. I wonder what all this will mean in the airports. What kind of sense of urgency will all those agents who aren't getting paid have? Since there is no sense of urgency that I can see when they are getting paid I don't think it is possible to step things down much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedmondCruiser Posted March 2, 2015 #17 Share Posted March 2, 2015 If customs is not paid (though all their personal bills do no take a sabbatical) whats the incentive to work ? Imagine several people call in sick leaving one customs official to clear a ship, and they decide to do it by the book. A ship might clear and be zero'd out by 4pm. There can be real consequences to a shut down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisoxfan Posted March 2, 2015 #18 Share Posted March 2, 2015 They can economize by dropping half of the TSA force and conducting only REASONABLE security screenings at airports. So much of what they do is smoke and mirrors. A huge waste of money IMO. Are you implying that the extensive TSA (Totally Senseless Agency) search of my 85 year old Korean War wounded Marine vet father in law (where he was asked to remove his shoes, partially pull down his pants, and otherwise be groped and interrogated ) was unreasonable? Unfortunately this overzealous and ridiculous scrutiny occured on both legs of his flight. I wonder why he now refuses to fly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PORT ROYAL Posted March 2, 2015 #19 Share Posted March 2, 2015 Are you implying that the extensive TSA (Totally Senseless Agency) search of my 85 year old Korean War wounded Marine vet father in law (where he was asked to remove his shoes, partially pull down his pants, and otherwise be groped and interrogated ) was unreasonable? Unfortunately this overzealous and ridiculous scrutiny occured on both legs of his flight. I wonder why he now refuses to fly. Appalling! Add to this the obnoxious manner in which one is spoken to, it all adds up to a total disgrace to the uniform and their country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retired714 Posted March 2, 2015 #20 Share Posted March 2, 2015 The TSA employees will get fired if they don't show up to work. For those old enough, remember when they fired all the Air Traffic controllers for going on strike in 1980? In 2012, my boss (a 2nd level supervisor with 25 years federal service) was notified that if she was 'deemed essential' for furlough in Oct., and didn't show up, she would be fired. She was in the middle if a long planned cruise to the Mediterranean. Fortunately for her we we not essential. We already had 3 unpaid furlough days that year that were NOT reimbursed, then we're off work 17 days. Yes employees did get paid for end of Sept during that time, but didn't know if they would get reimbursed when they were called back to work or how long they would be off. So with that pay check they had to make a choice to pay rent/car payment/utilities - or save the money in case that was all the get for - who knew how long. And the Essential employees (TSA) had to make that decision while being required to report for work every day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Despegue Posted March 2, 2015 #21 Share Posted March 2, 2015 No pay, no work. Very simple. Nobody here in Belgium would work for even a day if salaries are not received on time. Not paying salary is voiding any contractual obligation to come to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retired714 Posted March 2, 2015 #22 Share Posted March 2, 2015 No pay, no work. Very simple. Nobody here in Belgium would work for even a day if salaries are not received on time. Not paying salary is voiding any contractual obligation to come to work. Despegue, if US Federal employees were so allowed to not work, that might make approving a budget a higher priority for our Houses of Congress! But no more politics, the crisis has been avoided for 3 weeks. Let's talk about going on a trouble free cruise!:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qsuzi Posted March 2, 2015 Author #23 Share Posted March 2, 2015 (edited) Despegue, if US Federal employees were so allowed to not work, that might make approving a budget a higher priority for our Houses of Congress! But no more politics, the crisis has been avoided for 3 weeks. Let's talk about going on a trouble free cruise!:D Here's to a trouble free cruise. Ours starts Saturday! :D Edited March 2, 2015 by qsuzi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randyk47 Posted March 2, 2015 #24 Share Posted March 2, 2015 No pay, no work. Very simple. Nobody here in Belgium would work for even a day if salaries are not received on time. Not paying salary is voiding any contractual obligation to come to work. Government employees fall into a different category here in the US. They can be in essence forced to come to work even if they are not being paid on time. Failure to show up for work could lead to dismissal though admittedly that's an extreme situation. While some government employees are covered by union negotiated "contracts" these contracts are not quite the same as a totally private corporation and its contracts with its employees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peaches from georgia Posted March 3, 2015 #25 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Despegue, if US Federal employees were so allowed to not work, that might make approving a budget a higher priority for our Houses of Congress! But no more politics, the crisis has been avoided for 3 weeks. Let's talk about going on a trouble free cruise!:D The "crisis" was avoided for only one week. The 3 week bill did not pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now