hel0013 Posted December 17, 2016 #1 Share Posted December 17, 2016 One of the accused plead guilty to smuggling 95 kilograms of cocaine into Australia aboard the Sea Princess News Article Original CC thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill B Posted December 17, 2016 #2 Share Posted December 17, 2016 One of the accused plead guilty to smuggling 95 kilograms of cocaine into Australia aboard the Sea Princess 95 kg? They must have not flown; or, have used an airline with an extremely generous luggage allowance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkmw Posted December 17, 2016 #3 Share Posted December 17, 2016 95 kg? They must have not flown; or, have used an airline with an extremely generous luggage allowance! this was posted on the Australian/NZ board, just a follow up http://boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=2432369 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griller Posted December 17, 2016 #4 Share Posted December 17, 2016 95 kg? They must have not flown; or, have used an airline with an extremely generous luggage allowance! When I read about this the other day the article mentioned one of the ports they called at was in Colombia. A common place to export cocaine. Still difficult to bring heavy packages on to a ship without it arousing some interest from security at any port except where you embark though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted December 17, 2016 #5 Share Posted December 17, 2016 95 kg? They must have not flown; or, have used an airline with an extremely generous luggage allowance! They may have picked up the drugs during the cruise from Dover where they embarked. Maybe they got them in Colombia. I found it interesting that they didn't disembark in Sydney at the end of the world cruise. They were staying on for the next cruise and getting off in Fremantle. Maybe they intended to take the drugs ashore when the Sea Princess called into Brisbane for a day visit. Checks on passengers going ashore for the day are not as stringent as passengers disembarking in Sydney. The Australian Federal Police knew ahead of time that drugs were (or were likely to be) on board. They raided the ship with drug detection dogs when it docked in Sydney. Most passengers on board were unaware of events until they heard it on the news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griller Posted December 17, 2016 #6 Share Posted December 17, 2016 They may have picked up the drugs during the cruise from Dover where they embarked. Maybe they got them in Colombia. I found it interesting that they didn't disembark in Sydney at the end of the world cruise. They were staying on for the next cruise and getting off in Fremantle. Maybe they intended to take the drugs ashore when the Sea Princess called into Brisbane for a day visit. Checks on passengers going ashore for the day are not as stringent as passengers disembarking in Sydney. The Australian Federal Police knew ahead of time that drugs were (or were likely to be) on board. They raided the ship with drug detection dogs when it docked in Sydney. Most passengers on board were unaware of events until they heard it on the news. Australian Customs are very thorough. Confiscated my rosary beads and they had been blessed by the Pope! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murphey Posted December 17, 2016 #7 Share Posted December 17, 2016 Australian Customs are very thorough. Confiscated my rosary beads and they had been blessed by the Pope! Why??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hel0013 Posted December 17, 2016 Author #8 Share Posted December 17, 2016 I haven't read it anywhere but.... I'm thinking her guilty plea is part of a plea bargain???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
easyboy Posted December 18, 2016 #9 Share Posted December 18, 2016 I found it interesting that they didn't disembark in Sydney at the end of the world cruise. They were staying on for the next cruise and getting off in Fremantle. Maybe they intended to take the drugs ashore when the Sea Princess called into Brisbane for a day visit. Checks on passengers going ashore for the day are not as stringent as passengers disembarking in Sydney. Their contacts may have known the risks of having the transaction in Sydney. Sent from my iPad using Forums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill B Posted December 18, 2016 #10 Share Posted December 18, 2016 When I read about this the other day the article mentioned one of the ports they called at was in Colombia. Cocaine? Almost certainly they brought it aboard the ship in Columbia and never flew anywhere with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill B Posted December 18, 2016 #11 Share Posted December 18, 2016 Australian Customs are very thorough. Confiscated my rosary beads and they had been blessed by the Pope! Obviously the blessing didn't work. ;) Were they wood? If you want to see something outrageous, get off a flight from China at SYD... officers are opening hundreds of suitcases and it seems as though 98% of the pax are carrying food: fruit, vegetables and meat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief02 Posted December 18, 2016 #12 Share Posted December 18, 2016 The AU Police got a good tip on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky TGO Posted December 18, 2016 #13 Share Posted December 18, 2016 I like to know how much she is going to like her vacation in one of Australia's jails. She may be there a long time. Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griller Posted December 18, 2016 #14 Share Posted December 18, 2016 (edited) Why??? They were wood. And old and very small but I now know anything wood might have insects in which could destroy the fragile ecosystem of Australia. I wonder what they do about wooden boats or ships with wooden parts which visit Australia? Or driftwood? Or insects which fly from neighboring countries? Edited December 18, 2016 by Griller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoBadKnees Posted December 18, 2016 #15 Share Posted December 18, 2016 They were wood. And old and very small but I now know anything wood might have insects in which could destroy the fragile ecosystem of Australia.I wonder what they do about wooden boats or ships with wooden parts which visit Australia? Or driftwood? Or insects which fly from neighboring countries? Too bad they wouldn't allow you to immediately seal them in a plastic bag, box it and post them back home from the inspection station. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoBadKnees Posted December 18, 2016 #16 Share Posted December 18, 2016 If you want to see something outrageous, get off a flight from China at SYD... officers are opening hundreds of suitcases and it seems as though 98% of the pax are carrying food: fruit, vegetables and meat. I thought word would get around in China not to bring such things. Enough must be getting through to warrant the risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iancal Posted December 18, 2016 #17 Share Posted December 18, 2016 (edited) The Australian Federal Police were advised by Canadian authorities that these were 'high risk' passengers. On arrival in Sydney the police, accompanied by sniffer dogs, went to a number of specific cabins and conducted searches. It was not happenstance. We saw something similar a few years ago when we were disembarking in Miami. Two people ahead passed their sea cards over for the checkout. They were both immediately shuffled over to an area where there police and some plain clothes folks. Others had previously been sent there. Dogs were active. I hope they throw them in prison and throw away the key. Unfortunately we in Canada have reciprocity with some foreign prisons so, unfortunately, they may just end up back in a Canadian prison. Edited December 18, 2016 by iancal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murphey Posted December 18, 2016 #18 Share Posted December 18, 2016 They were wood. And old and very small but I now know anything wood might have insects in which could destroy the fragile ecosystem of Australia.I wonder what they do about wooden boats or ships with wooden parts which visit Australia? Or driftwood? Or insects which fly from neighboring countries? Got it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare A&L_Ont Posted December 18, 2016 #19 Share Posted December 18, 2016 Anyone else notice the drugs were wrapped in Princess blue and white pool towels in their suitcases? I wonder, did they buy them or borrow them.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hel0013 Posted December 18, 2016 Author #20 Share Posted December 18, 2016 The Australian Federal Police were advised by Canadian authorities that these were 'high risk' passengers. Do you have a source for this? What was it that made them 'high risk' passengers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare A&L_Ont Posted December 18, 2016 #21 Share Posted December 18, 2016 Do you have a source for this? What was it that made them 'high risk' passengers? 20 year olds on a world cruise. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrak Posted December 18, 2016 #22 Share Posted December 18, 2016 News articles are saying the younger woman "may" have been unaware of the drugs even though she shared the cabin for something like 40 days. I guess if the suitcase was never opened it may be possible but I don't know that it will work as a defense. :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hel0013 Posted December 18, 2016 Author #23 Share Posted December 18, 2016 20 year olds on a world cruise. :p Paid for in cash! :eek: :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare A&L_Ont Posted December 18, 2016 #24 Share Posted December 18, 2016 Paid for in cash! :eek: :D Or bartered for.:D;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfaaa Posted December 18, 2016 #25 Share Posted December 18, 2016 Do you have a source for this? What was it that made them 'high risk' passengers? The one pleaded guilty is a porn model. Hardly low profile. Flaunting their expensive trip on FB certainly brought them more attention than they realized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now