cruz chic Posted September 3, 2015 Author #76 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Well, I'm a little disappointed in the Mariner Society because they didn't get back to me as promised. I'll give it until next week and then call back. Will keep you all posted (even though we all know what the outcome will be!). Thanks for the update. They likely want people to forget. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeniEncinitas Posted September 3, 2015 #77 Share Posted September 3, 2015 My cruise that I booked on our cruise this past March for our Med cruise on The Eurodam October 9th, 2016is still the same price when we purchased it. Explore 4 did not change at all. So go figure! I checked again this am and it is still the same. hummmmm. Denise:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qsuzi Posted September 3, 2015 #78 Share Posted September 3, 2015 My cruise that I booked on our cruise this past March for our Med cruise on The Eurodam October 9th, 2016is still the same price when we purchased it. Explore 4 did not change at all.So go figure! I checked again this am and it is still the same. hummmmm. Denise:) That's great - no fare increase and get Explore 4 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaBands Posted September 3, 2015 #79 Share Posted September 3, 2015 they first quoted $750 to our TA but we said it was too much and she got it reduced to $350 and we added it to our Pdam in Nov. 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jade13 Posted September 3, 2015 #80 Share Posted September 3, 2015 If the the way it works, then it would give everyone on an Explore4 package an incentive to order all 15 drinks every day, even if they then just pour half of them down the drain. Extra immediate wasted costs for the cruise line in drinks; extra potential costs in faster promotion to higher Mariner tiers. It wouldn't make much sense. I was thinking the same thing. Seattle probably is confused with the free drinks package verses one that is paid for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxmantoo Posted September 3, 2015 #81 Share Posted September 3, 2015 I was thinking the same thing. Seattle probably is confused with the free drinks package verses one that is paid for. A company does not stay in business for as long as Holland America has by being "confused". It is always surprising when people here think the company is being run by a bunch of imbeciles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilvertoGold Posted September 3, 2015 #82 Share Posted September 3, 2015 (edited) A company does not stay in business for as long as Holland America has by being "confused". It is always surprising when people here think the company is being run by a bunch of imbeciles. Absolutely, but I think Jade13 may not be referring to the higher ups in Seattle, just the front line employees who interact with the pax. These front line employees do not seem to have correct or current info at times. Sounds like poor training on HAL's part or unengaged employees. Edited September 3, 2015 by SilvertoGold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avian777 Posted September 3, 2015 #83 Share Posted September 3, 2015 A company does not stay in business for as long as Holland America has by being "confused". It is always surprising when people here think the company is being run by a bunch of imbeciles. Great post! As usual IMO you are spot on ... to me it's even more surprising to see some posters say (or strongly imply) that such missteps are intentional and that HAL intentionally gives out bad and/or conflicting info. If I believed HAL was run by a bunch of malevolent imbeciles, I certainly wouldn't trust my safety (and that of my family) to the people staffing/running HAL's ships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilvertoGold Posted September 3, 2015 #84 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Great post! As usual IMO you are spot on ... to me it's even more surprising to see some posters say (or strongly imply) that such missteps are intentional and that HAL intentionally gives out bad and/or conflicting info. If I believed HAL was run by a bunch of malevolent imbeciles, I certainly wouldn't trust my safety (and that of my family) to the people staffing/running HAL's ships. Good post. I agree, as noted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruz chic Posted September 3, 2015 Author #85 Share Posted September 3, 2015 I think this an excellent site for information. For the life of me I can't understand why anyone would participate if they think there is nothing but poor information here. Best to go directly to Hal for everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fouremco Posted September 3, 2015 #86 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Great post! As usual IMO you are spot on ... to me it's even more surprising to see some posters say (or strongly imply) that such missteps are intentional and that HAL intentionally gives out bad and/or conflicting info. If I believed HAL was run by a bunch of malevolent imbeciles, I certainly wouldn't trust my safety (and that of my family) to the people staffing/running HAL's ships. While posters have observed that HAL employees sometimes provide inaccurate information - this thread provides an excellent example - no one is accusing HAL of intentionally giving out wrong information IMO. I'm glad to read that you don't put your trust in malevolent imbeciles, something you actually have in common with all CC members. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruz chic Posted September 3, 2015 Author #87 Share Posted September 3, 2015 While posters have observed that HAL employees sometimes provide inaccurate information - this thread provides an excellent example - no one is accusing HAL of intentionally giving out wrong information IMO. I'm glad to read that you don't put your trust in malevolent imbeciles, something you actually have in common with all CC members. :) That's it in a nutshell. I haven't seen one post suggesting that. It's a huge, huge stretch to suggest that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landlubber54 Posted September 3, 2015 #88 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Thanks for posting this. You purchased the Signature Beverage package? Or you had Explore 4? Just to make sure: this thread is about Explore 4 which is included in the price of the cruise. The SBP is what you pay for yourself separately. I may have created unnecessary confusion by being totally mistaken (wrong). As background, while on a cruise, we arranged a subsequent cruise that included the Explore 4 package. However, our plans changed. After going with another cruise, we forfeited most of the Explore 4 package, but not the SBP. So we still had the SBP, without paying for it separately. The incorrect assumption I made had to do with how we were credited with cruise days based on on-board purchases. I assumed we were getting credit for beverage purchases even though we had the SBP. That is wrong. The additional days we got were based on the excursions we purchased through HAL. Sorry about my mis-statements. Still recovering from a wonderful cruise. :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilvertoGold Posted September 3, 2015 #89 Share Posted September 3, 2015 I may have created unnecessary confusion by being totally mistaken (wrong). As background, while on a cruise, we arranged a subsequent cruise that included the Explore 4 package. However, our plans changed. After going with another cruise, we forfeited most of the Explore 4 package, but not the SBP. So we still had the SBP, without paying for it separately. The incorrect assumption I made had to do with how we were credited with cruise days based on on-board purchases. I assumed we were getting credit for beverage purchases even though we had the SBP. That is wrong. The additional days we got were based on the excursions we purchased through HAL. Sorry about my mis-statements. Still recovering from a wonderful cruise. :o Thanks for your response. I was wondering about this. I can understand getting a a bit mixed up: I am useless for days after a cruise!! Glad you enjoyed the Noordam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avian777 Posted September 4, 2015 #90 Share Posted September 4, 2015 ... For the life of me I can't understand why anyone would participate if they think there is nothing but poor information here... I wouldn't presume to speak for anyone but myself, but I come here for the entertainment the posts provide. Thanks for asking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruz chic Posted September 4, 2015 Author #91 Share Posted September 4, 2015 How very, very sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberta Quilter Posted September 4, 2015 #92 Share Posted September 4, 2015 How very, very sad. I totally agree. It is sad if one enjoys some of the bullying, inappropriate comments, etc. that goes on here and calls it entertainment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizzie68 Posted September 4, 2015 #93 Share Posted September 4, 2015 I wouldn't presume to speak for anyone but myself, but I come here for the entertainment the posts provide. Thanks for asking. That speaks volumes and is definitely not in the spirit of Cruise Critic or the intent of the site. It was not created to provide entertainment to those who can't make their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruz chic Posted September 4, 2015 Author #94 Share Posted September 4, 2015 I couldn't agree more ladies. I've learned a ton on this site. More than I ever did in years of cruising. I still learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dakrewser Posted September 4, 2015 #95 Share Posted September 4, 2015 A company does not stay in business for as long as Holland America has by being "confused". It is always surprising when people here think the company is being run by a bunch of imbeciles. There are three possibilities: 1) front line customer service people make it up as they go along if they don't have the answer in front of them. Saying "I don't know" is anathema to them. 2) Front line customer service people are deliberately provided with conflicting/confusing information 3) CC posters are very poor listeners/questioners when talking to HAL's CSRs. All of them. I personally (and from much CSR experience) pick #1, but you could choose a different answer. After all, this is just opinion, we don't have the facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dakrewser Posted September 4, 2015 #96 Share Posted September 4, 2015 I totally agree. It is sad if one enjoys some of the bullying, inappropriate comments, etc. that goes on here and calls it entertainment. The poster said they read for entertainment value, there was no mention of "bullying, inappropriate comments, etc.". Of course, some may consider that entertaining also... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dakrewser Posted September 4, 2015 #97 Share Posted September 4, 2015 That speaks volumes and is definitely not in the spirit of Cruise Critic or the intent of the site. It was not created to provide entertainment to those who can't make their own. It's quite possible to be both entertaining and informative at the same time. After all, the subtitle is "A Community of People Who Love To Cruise". Would you remove all of the entertaining posts from the boards? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaBands Posted September 4, 2015 #98 Share Posted September 4, 2015 or you don't it won't affect what you drink or whether to take the cruise or not. Just think of it as a bonus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jade13 Posted September 4, 2015 #99 Share Posted September 4, 2015 (edited) A company does not stay in business for as long as Holland America has by being "confused". It is always surprising when people here think the company is being run by a bunch of imbeciles. By "Seattle" I mean the Reps giving out the information, which as most of us know did turn out to be incorrect. Edited September 4, 2015 by Jade13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jade13 Posted September 4, 2015 #100 Share Posted September 4, 2015 (edited) There are three possibilities:1) front line customer service people make it up as they go along if they don't have the answer in front of them. Saying "I don't know" is anathema to them. 2) Front line customer service people are deliberately provided with conflicting/confusing information 3) CC posters are very poor listeners/questioners when talking to HAL's CSRs. All of them. I personally (and from much CSR experience) pick #1, but you could choose a different answer. After all, this is just opinion, we don't have the facts. Agree with you. Also think #3 is possible which is why I asked if the person calling made it clear they were asking about a "Free" drinks package that was part of their cruise fare. Of course if they paid independently for the drinks package of course they would get additional mariner credit. Edited September 4, 2015 by Jade13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now