Jump to content

Scenic Tours case off to High Court


Recommended Posts

The prior class action against Scenic Tours for the river cruise that wasn’t is now heading to the High Court on a leave to appeal application.

 

some interesting points of law are being argued.

Edited by GUT2407
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MicCanberra said:

Wow, they will  really drag this one out.

I have heard the High Court looked set to grant leave on one of the four or five grounds of appeal, when the appellate sought time to amend the appeal.

 

a big issue was if the Civil Liability Act appls to the assessment of damages for disappointment and distress, basically if it does it is a personal injury and there needs to be a 15% loss of function to recover under that head of damages and that was the one ground two justices appeared set to grant leave in relation to.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any lawyers amongst the distressed passengers.

 

I seem to remember from the ex doing law there is some sort of precedent for holiday upset solicitors.

 

 

Perhaps Jarvis vs Someone or other.

Edited by Docker123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Docker123 said:

Any lawyers amongst the distressed passengers.

 

I seem to remember from the ex doing law there is some sort of precedent for holiday upset solicitors.

 

There’s certainly precedent for for disappointment and distress over a holiday being claimable under contract law, and that it could be a head of damages in personal injury law, in Moore v Scenic the Supreme Court was old that both parties agreed that it disappointment and damages constituted personal injury, the problem then however was that they then had to meet the 15% threshold under the Civil Liability Act, that concession may come back and bite them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of money you will spend on lawyers to recover the entire cost of one holiday will keep Mr. and Mrs Gut on annual overseas cruises for the next five years.

 

Just sayin'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Obilix said:

The amount of money you will spend on lawyers to recover the entire cost of one holiday will keep Mr. and Mrs Gut on annual overseas cruises for the next five years.

 

Just sayin'.

Hope so anyway, love a story with a happy ending, you know “the lawyers got the lot”, though some mugs are probably doing it no win no fee. It actually an interesting legal issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, GUT2407 said:

Hope so anyway, love a story with a happy ending, you know “the lawyers got the lot”, though some mugs are probably doing it no win no fee. It actually an interesting legal issue.

They always win enough to come out ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GUT2407 said:

Hope so anyway, love a story with a happy ending, you know “the lawyers got the lot”, though some mugs are probably doing it no win no fee. It actually an interesting legal issue.

Only two types of people I don't like.....lawyers and school teachers 😂😂😂😂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a lawyer, however I feel Scenic Tours has lost good will in public opinion, by not putting their passengers first.  Other river cruise lines put passengers first by giving them a choice to cancel.  What price loss of reputation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MMDown Under said:

I am not a lawyer, however I feel Scenic Tours has lost good will in public opinion, by not putting their passengers first.  Other river cruise lines put passengers first by giving them a choice to cancel.  What price loss of reputation?

Yeah sometimes a win is a loss

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MMDown Under said:

I am not a lawyer, however I feel Scenic Tours has lost good will in public opinion, by not putting their passengers first.  Other river cruise lines put passengers first by giving them a choice to cancel.  What price loss of reputation?

I agree, it (customer service after an incident) has turned me off several companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, MicCanberra said:

I agree, it (customer service after an incident) has turned me off several companies.

I frequently say it’s not companies not having things go wrong, but how they deal with the fall out when things do go wrong, that really matters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know many holiday/travel related companies that give a refund for bad weather, especially when they still deliver a substitute service, and it's also disclosed in their terms and conditions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the big issue is failing to give notice so people could decide to cancel. Same issue as the Aussie cruise that went south instead of north when the cyclone blew up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the contract covers that situation, so there isn't a leg to stand on. And no false advertising - if a cruise isn't possible due to weather then they provide a substitute, the same as other travel providers. It's not as though they guarantee that every single sector will operate. And they only substitute what is necessary.

 

All the travel businesses have wordings and procedures to cover substitution.

Edited by The_Big_M
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...