liketraveling Posted May 25, 2017 #1 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Looking at Planning my next cruise. I am looking at the Eurodam to Hawaii. You can board in either Seattle or Vancouver. I am thinking of joining in Vancouver and adding the Pacific coastal cruise to San Francisco. If I get on in Vancouver I think I should be OK to add the 3 day coastal cruise. Would this work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuthC Posted May 25, 2017 #2 Share Posted May 25, 2017 I don't know the itinerary. However, if you board the ship in Vancouver, and disembark in the US, then the PVSA does not come in to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinfool Posted May 26, 2017 #3 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Yeah...you should be good unless someone who doesn't understand the law gets his grimy fingers in the mix. HAL has been at it a long time, so I wouldn't think that likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sequim88 Posted May 26, 2017 #4 Share Posted May 26, 2017 From a database and scheduling perspective I would think when the season/year schedule is first set up it would be very easy to make a cross reference table of cruises that can't be combined so that the reservations system red flags any attempt that violates PSVA. Presumably set up by someone who knows the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ2002 Posted May 26, 2017 #5 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Call HAL just to be sure. They will be able to advise you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InTheWASide Posted May 26, 2017 #6 Share Posted May 26, 2017 String the whole itinerary together as though it were one. Do you start in and end in 2 cities in the US that are not the same city? If so, this is not allowed. If it's the same US city roundtrip, again for the WHOLE THING, then you're fine If Vancouver is either the very first port or the very last port, again... WHOLE THING, then it's not even applicable and you're fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzardboy Posted May 26, 2017 #7 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Definitely talk to HAL. I asked about only doing the 7 days or so around the islands of the 16-18 day "Circle Hawaii" cruises and was told there's some Hawaiian agreement that prevents all lines but I think Norwegian from allowing passengers to start or end a cruise there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catl331 Posted May 26, 2017 #8 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Definitely talk to HAL. I asked about only doing the 7 days or so around the islands of the 16-18 day "Circle Hawaii" cruises and was told there's some Hawaiian agreement that prevents all lines but I think Norwegian from allowing passengers to start or end a cruise there.Would you be able to get on and off at the same port? If not, that's a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tallyho8 Posted May 26, 2017 #9 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Definitely talk to HAL. I asked about only doing the 7 days or so around the islands of the 16-18 day "Circle Hawaii" cruises and was told there's some Hawaiian agreement that prevents all lines but I think Norwegian from allowing passengers to start or end a cruise there. There is no such agreement. Many cruise lines start or end cruises in Hawaii. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare richwmn Posted May 26, 2017 #10 Share Posted May 26, 2017 There is no such agreement. Many cruise lines start or end cruises in Hawaii. Under the PVSA a cruise may only begin or end in Hawaii if the other end point is in a foreign country, including Canada (Vancouver) or Mexico (Ensenada), or stops at a "distant" foreign port. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catl331 Posted May 26, 2017 #11 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Under the PVSA a cruise may only begin or end in Hawaii if the other end point is in a foreign country, including Canada (Vancouver) or Mexico (Ensenada), or stops at a "distant" foreign port.Right, because even a closed loop (say on and off at Hilo) would require a stop at a near foreign port, and there aren't any. NCL used to take the 900 mile stretch down to Fanning Island and back before they got Congress to make an exception for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AV8rix Posted May 26, 2017 #12 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Right, because even a closed loop (say on and off at Hilo) would require a stop at a near foreign port, and there aren't any. NCL used to take the 900 mile stretch down to Fanning Island and back before they got Congress to make an exception for them. I don't believe that it was an act of Congress. It is simply that NCL's POA is flagged USA, so it can start and end in the USA. Same as the river cruise ships that ply the Mississippi or Columbia. They're flagged USA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmoo here Posted May 27, 2017 #13 Share Posted May 27, 2017 String the whole itinerary together as though it were one. Do you start in and end in 2 cities in the US that are not the same city? If so, this is not allowed. If it's the same US city roundtrip, again for the WHOLE THING, then you're fine If Vancouver is either the very first port or the very last port, again... WHOLE THING, then it's not even applicable and you're fine Best answer. The PVSA only looks at what port the passenger got on the ship and what port the passenger got off the ship. If both ports are the same port, or if one of the ports is a foreign port, the PVSA does not apply. If both ports are different US ports, then the PVSA applies. And any cruise that starts and ends in two different US ports must have a "distant" foreign port stop. A "distant" foreign port is any port NOT in North America, Central America, the Bermuda Islands, or the West Indies (including the Bahama Islands, but not including the Leeward Islands of the Netherlands Antilles, i.e., Aruba, Bonaire, and Curacao). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liketraveling Posted May 27, 2017 Author #14 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Best answer. The PVSA only looks at what port the passenger got on the ship and what port the passenger got off the ship. If both ports are the same port, or if one of the ports is a foreign port, the PVSA does not apply. If both ports are different US ports, then the PVSA applies. And any cruise that starts and ends in two different US ports must have a "distant" foreign port stop. A "distant" foreign port is any port NOT in North America, Central America, the Bermuda Islands, or the West Indies (including the Bahama Islands, but not including the Leeward Islands of the Netherlands Antilles, i.e., Aruba, Bonaire, and Curacao). This is how I understand it. I cruise with my elderly father and we are having a disagreement about it. I emailed my PCC for clarification. He will believe her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmoo here Posted May 27, 2017 #15 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Looking at Planning my next cruise. I am looking at the Eurodam to Hawaii. You can board in either Seattle or Vancouver. I am thinking of joining in Vancouver and adding the Pacific coastal cruise to San Francisco. If I get on in Vancouver I think I should be OK to add the 3 day coastal cruise. Would this work? Can you clairify which specific cruises you are looking at? I can see a 17 night Seattle/Vancouver cruise that goes to Hawaii. And then there's a 16 night Vancouver roundtrip to Hawaii. Nevermind, they are actually the same cruise. Starts in Seattle - one day cruise to Vancouver. Then the 16 night Vancouver round trip. That cruise B2B with the following Vancouver/San Francisco cruise is totally OK under the PVSA. One other note - not all PCCs are versed in the PVSA. It's often called the "Jones Act" but that deals with cargo, not people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuthC Posted May 27, 2017 #16 Share Posted May 27, 2017 I don't believe that it was an act of Congress. It is simply that NCL's POA is flagged USA, so it can start and end in the USA. Same as the river cruise ships that ply the Mississippi or Columbia. They're flagged USA. There was more to it than just flagging the ship as US. There was an act of Congress involved because the ship itself was not built in the US, using US-made materials. That is also part of the usual requirements to keep the PVSA from entering into the itinerary considerations. Having primarily US staff and crew was easy, but necessary, after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuthC Posted May 27, 2017 #17 Share Posted May 27, 2017 The PVSA only looks at what port the passenger got on the ship and what port the passenger got off the ship. That is correct. If both ports are the same port, or if one of the ports is a foreign port, the PVSA does not apply. That is not correct. If the passenger starts, or ends, in a foreign port, the PVSA does not apply, that is true. However, if the passenger starts and ends in the same US port, the ship must visit a near foreign port. If the passenger boards in one US port, and leaves in a different US port, then the ship must visit a distant foreign port. So, if the passenger boards in Seattle, and disembarks in San Francisco, then the ship would have to visit a distant foreign port. It does not sound like the referenced itinerary does that. But if the passenger boards in Vancouver, and disembarks in San Francisco, then the PVSA would not apply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted May 27, 2017 #18 Share Posted May 27, 2017 There was more to it than just flagging the ship as US. There was an act of Congress involved because the ship itself was not built in the US, using US-made materials. That is also part of the usual requirements to keep the PVSA from entering into the itinerary considerations. Having primarily US staff and crew was easy, but necessary, after that. Yes, the POA has an exemption from Congress to be able to trade in the PVSA trade, since it was completed in a foreign shipyard. I'm still not sure that was required, since even PVSA or Jones Act ships can have significant amounts of non-US content in their construction. Part of POA's exemption is that she is limited to trading only in Hawaii, or when transiting to/from a shipyard. Having experienced 4 years of crewing on the 3 NCL US flag ships, I would say that "having primarily US staff and crew was easy" is way off the mark. US manning requires that all crew be US citizens, but that 25% of the unlicensed crew can be legal foreign residents (green card holders). Only near the end of the time when there were 3 ships operating there, did another act of Congress allow some of those 25% to be foreign crew without green cards. There were strict rules applied as to who could be included in this (had to have worked for NCL for 10 years prior, and NCL had to vouch for the people as if they were under a B1 work visa, etc). The problem comes with the USCG's stricter requirements for crew documentation, over the other international crew. It cost NCL at that time (I don't know the cost today, but it must still be similar) about $8000 just to get a new crew member documented, trained, and standing on the pier waiting to get on the ship. Finding folks who wanted to invest the time for documentation (before actually being hired), the time for training, and then the work schedule and pay was anything but "easy". But I digress from the thread's topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSR Posted May 27, 2017 #19 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Per RuthC: If the passenger starts, or ends, in a foreign port, the PVSA does not apply, that is true. However, if the passenger starts and ends in the same US port, the ship must visit a near foreign port. If the passenger boards in one US port, and leaves in a different US port, then the ship must visit a distant foreign port. So, if the passenger boards in Seattle, and disembarks in San Francisco, then the ship would have to visit a distant foreign port. It does not sound like the referenced itinerary does that. But if the passenger boards in Vancouver, and disembarks in San Francisco, then the PVSA would not apply. Right you are! If you travel San Diego-Hawaii-San Diego, you have to stop in Mexico (usually Ensenada) as the near foreign port. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzardboy Posted May 27, 2017 #20 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Under the PVSA a cruise may only begin or end in Hawaii if the other end point is in a foreign country, including Canada (Vancouver) or Mexico (Ensenada), or stops at a "distant" foreign port. Norwegian has round trip Honolulu to Honolulu cruises. I believe they're the only one allowed to start and end in Hawaii. That's what I was referring to in my earlier post. These cruises do not visit ports other than in Hawaii To quote Dennis Miller, "That's my opinion and I could be wrong!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare richwmn Posted May 27, 2017 #21 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Norwegian has round trip Honolulu to Honolulu cruises. I believe they're the only one allowed to start and end in Hawaii. That's what I was referring to in my earlier post. These cruises do not visit ports other than in Hawaii To quote Dennis Miller, "That's my opinion and I could be wrong!" As mentioned several places in this thread, NCL's Pride of America is not restricted by the PVSA because she is US flagged. POA can move freely around Hawaii. Please see the post by chengkp75 just prior to yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzardboy Posted May 27, 2017 #22 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Thanks richwmn and chengkp75. I am guilty of selective reading/replying - one of the hazards of only being notified by CC of one in about every six posts in a thread is you sometimes miss the most important. I knew there was a quirk in the situation that favored NCL. Sometimes when you stir up enough mud it all becomes clear! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catl331 Posted May 27, 2017 #23 Share Posted May 27, 2017 However, if the passenger starts and ends in the same US port, the ship must visit a near foreign port. Except a "cruise-to-nowhere" that doesn't stop anywhere. Those don't happen often though. Eurodam did one out of NYC before heading to FL for the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinfool Posted May 27, 2017 #24 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Except a "cruise-to-nowhere" that doesn't stop anywhere. Those don't happen often though. Eurodam did one out of NYC before heading to FL for the first time. CTN's have been regulated out of existence. A US court ruled that they violate some US law or regulation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtl513 Posted May 27, 2017 #25 Share Posted May 27, 2017 (edited) deleted Edited May 27, 2017 by jtl513 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now