Jump to content

Would you sail one of the original Royal Caribbean ship if it was in the fleet today?


Would you want to sail on any of the original Royal ships today?  

185 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you want to sail on any of the original Royal ships today?

    • Yes - I'd like to try a small ship and traditional cruising style
    • No - I prefer a larger ship with more dining and entertainment options.


Recommended Posts

Would anyone sail today on Song of Norway, Nordic Prince, or Sun Viking if they were still in service with Royal Caribbean today.

 

For frame of reference Song of Norway originally was 552 feet, 18,000 gross tons, and had a passenger capacity of 720! The ship was stretched to 638 feet, 23,000 gross tons, and had a passenger capacity of 1200. For comparison the smallest Royal ship currently is Legend of the Seas/Splendour of the Seas at 69,000 gross tons, 867 feet, and a capacity of nearly 2100 guests.

 

So, if these ships (with updated systems and decor) were still in the fleet would you want to sail on them? You'd trade off a lot of the entertainment and dining options in order to get a more traditional, intimate cruising experience. I have never sailed on a ship this small but do admit I'd love to give it a try with a first rate company.

 

199351.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beautiful little ship. I saw her docked behind us when I was on the NORWAY in 1983. Always wanted to sail on her, but never did. RCCL has always had a knack for building pretty ships. Even OASIS and ALLURE, while large, have nice lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First cruise was on the Dolphin Seabreeze in '95, similar size.

 

The man issue is lack of things to do when compared to current sailings. Since there was no kids club, you were stuck with them, and they were everywhere.

 

These days I need my solarium, entertainment, and dining venues. I'd consider any ship that had those and things to keep kids busy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sailed on Song of Norway in '84 and Nordic Prince in '86 and '89. Yeah, I'd do it again - even climb the outside stairs to the Viking Crown Lounge! That was the only way to reach it on these ships! :) And our 17-year-old son loved the teen club on the Song of Norway!

 

However, gotta say I do love all the amenities of the much bigger ships of today. Would love to see the wonderful food of those days, but we do fine with the quality nowadays. And prices are relatively low!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to sail in one of the original ships!:)

 

I agree. Our first RCI cruise was in 1983 on Song of Norway and it was also our first in an outside room. By today's standards, our room was tiny but the service was spectacular. No casino at that time and entertainment was pretty much limited to the main show room, and dining options in no way approximated what is available today. Getting to the Viking Crown Lounge involved going outside on the pool deck and climbing stairs into lounge which was set into the stack, and had about 200 degrees of visability (perhaps less). Not until the Song of America debuted was there an elevator providing inside access to the Viking Crown Lounge.

We have sailed a number of other lines since then but regularly return to RCI which offers a cruise experience best suited to us. An Azamara cruise to the Med last year came closest in many respects to our cruises on Song of Norway and Nordic Prince.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... An Azamara cruise to the Med last year came closest in many respects to our cruises on Song of Norway and Nordic Prince.:)

I'm glad to hear this about Azamara. My wife has expressed interest in trying Azamara. and now I'm intrigued.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be fun....all I need is a pool for relaxation and I am a happy camper!

 

I have no idea the size differences between those original Royal ships and Her Majesty, which is still in the fleet. Can someone give a short comparison.

 

It is hard to find pictures of ships to compare their sizes, but just to get an idea here are some random photos of the early ships. Majesty is over three times the gross tonnage of Song of Norway (stretched). And holds ALMOST three times the amount of people. Three times gross tonnage means it has three times the interior enclosed volume. After lengthening Song of Norway was 637 feet and a 76 foot beam (distance across at widest point). Majesty is 880 feet with a 110 foot beam. The total PAX and Crew capacity of Song of Norway AFTER stretching was about 1600, whereas Majesty total PAX and Crew is around 3600

 

TH11-vi.jpg

 

102050658.k4hIkvxq.jpg

hubbard.JPG

spaceout.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely! I only recently crossed the 50/50 line on sailing ships of that size v sailing on the current crop of floating resorts because of the huge gap I have in my cruising history.

 

Nothing against the current behemoths, but often less is more.

 

Sent from my SCH-I435 using Forums mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • Special Event: Q&A with Laura Hodges Bethge, President Celebrity Cruises
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail on Sun Princess®
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • Cruise Insurance Q&A w/ Steve Dasseos of Tripinsurancestore.com June 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...