Gettingwarmer Posted January 8, 2022 Author #326 Share Posted January 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, wowzz said: Can't speak for P&O, but not on our Princess cruise. I believe P&O only offer testing if a negative test is required by the next port to be visited. 2 minutes ago, wowzz said: Can't speak for P&O, but not on our Princess cruise. I believe P&O only offer testing if a negative test is required by the next port to be visited. So what was the reason for the mass testing for the ship before reaching Madeira over Christmas. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yorkshirephil Posted January 8, 2022 #327 Share Posted January 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, Gettingwarmer said: So what was the reason for the mass testing for the ship before reaching Madeira over Christmas. Madeira comes under Portugal's regulations so a negative test is required to go ashore. Anything beyond that would suggest it was a P&O requirement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gettingwarmer Posted January 8, 2022 Author #328 Share Posted January 8, 2022 3 minutes ago, yorkshirephil said: Madeira comes under Portugal's regulations so a negative test is required to go ashore. Anything beyond that would suggest it was a P&O requirement. So if P&O did it why only on that cruise. All the people on board were tested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobstheboy Posted January 8, 2022 #329 Share Posted January 8, 2022 10 minutes ago, Gettingwarmer said: So what was the reason for the mass testing for the ship before reaching Madeira over Christmas. I have read elsewhere that at least two compulsory tests were done on the Canary Isles cruise on Iona. Very confusing mixed info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare Megabear2 Posted January 8, 2022 #330 Share Posted January 8, 2022 This is Molecrochip's post on the Cunard board a few minutes ago and the last paragraph may well give a clue ... "Posted 23 minutes ago I think one of the most contentious points is that the Cunard text does not explicitly say that the traveller will be liable for the costs if the insurer won’t pay. Thus implying the cruise line will pay. @Megabear2 @Interestedcruisefan If I was aware of a family friend who was offloaded by Spanish authorities and were not covered by their insurance for the negative parter, I would like to think the cruise line had assisted. If this had happened and the cruise line had dipped into their own pockets, when they believe contractually they don’t have to, it would almost certainly be and a case by case basis snd subject to a NDA to avoid media/social media coverage. Therefore, I couldn’t tell you, even if I categorically knew. I can tell you that the care team in Cunard/P&O are at full stretch and additional staff from across the organisation are being trained in the necessary protocols to assist affected customers (and crew)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yorkshirephil Posted January 8, 2022 #331 Share Posted January 8, 2022 15 minutes ago, Gettingwarmer said: So if P&O did it why only on that cruise. All the people on board were tested. It wasn't only on that cruise, P&O also sent an email to passengers on the Ventura 3rd Jan 35 night cruise we were booked on stating that extra testing would be carried out before reaching Madeira. I can only guess that this would be so they could disembark any positive cases before the six day run to the Caribbean. There is no info currently posted from the facecloth groups for that cruise to say whether anyone was or wasn't disembarked. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dermotsgirl Posted January 8, 2022 #332 Share Posted January 8, 2022 48 minutes ago, Gettingwarmer said: So if P&O did it why only on that cruise. All the people on board were tested. Perhaps they did it because they knew whey had an outbreak onboard and wanted to know how far it had spread ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gettingwarmer Posted January 8, 2022 Author #333 Share Posted January 8, 2022 7 minutes ago, Dermotsgirl said: Perhaps they did it because they knew whey had an outbreak onboard and wanted to know how far it had spread ? They had only just been tested at Southampton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dermotsgirl Posted January 8, 2022 #334 Share Posted January 8, 2022 6 minutes ago, Gettingwarmer said: They had only just been tested at Southampton. But we know by now that if the person had only recently been infected it wouldn’t show on a LFT. Four days to Madeira is plenty of time for these new infections to show up, to try to contain the situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowzz Posted January 8, 2022 #335 Share Posted January 8, 2022 18 minutes ago, Dermotsgirl said: Perhaps they did it because they knew whey had an outbreak onboard and wanted to know how far it had spread ? No, because passengers were told in advance tgat they would be tested prior to arrival in Madeira. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobstheboy Posted January 8, 2022 #336 Share Posted January 8, 2022 I hope Moley can let us know if routine compulsory testing has been stopped. I understand in certain circumstances testing may be necessary, but routine compulsory testing as a matter of course is the big question. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yorkshirephil Posted January 8, 2022 #337 Share Posted January 8, 2022 21 minutes ago, Dermotsgirl said: Perhaps they did it because they knew whey had an outbreak onboard and wanted to know how far it had spread ? Unlikely unless it was amongst crew, everyone is tested before embarkation and must test negative, however it is quite clear that some people who test negative before embarkation go on to be positive later. So a further test after a few days should catch some of those, however the speed at which Omicron spreads may mean it is too late, it will be interesting to hear from Ventura passengers once they reach the Caribbean 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowzz Posted January 8, 2022 #338 Share Posted January 8, 2022 14 minutes ago, bobstheboy said: I hope Moley can let us know if routine compulsory testing has been stopped. I understand in certain circumstances testing may be necessary, but routine compulsory testing as a matter of course is the big question. I was of the opinion that there never was routine compulsory testing, over and above that required by port authorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobstheboy Posted January 8, 2022 #339 Share Posted January 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, wowzz said: I was of the opinion that there never was routine compulsory testing, over and above that required by port authorities. What port authorities ? Portugal require a test if you want to go ashore, not if you stay onboard. Spain, as seen in Alicante, don't seem to be insisting on one. I have been following social media for months and there has been random compulsory testing. I just want the confusion cleared up by someone who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Anarchy Posted January 8, 2022 #340 Share Posted January 8, 2022 15 minutes ago, bobstheboy said: I just want the confusion cleared up by someone who knows. Reminds me of the X Files - The truth is out there. Maybe..... The whole situation appears to have been and continues to be so fluid, it's all a bit difficult to keep track of. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gettingwarmer Posted January 8, 2022 Author #341 Share Posted January 8, 2022 @molecrochip said this on the Cunard board. QM2 was routed back via the Azores too this past week. Very specifically. I would imagine that QM2 will stick to its planned route but there will be a covid test required ahead of calling at Madeira. Any positive cases may likely to cause QM2 to miss Tenerife. That said, whether there is a different negotiation position when you're homeward bound, I'm not sure. On other cruises, Tenerife has been the first of a number of Spanish territories visited, not the last. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobstheboy Posted January 8, 2022 #342 Share Posted January 8, 2022 Just asked the question re routine testing on another site, person who was on Christmas cruise, Iona, which visited Canary Isles, said the passengers were all tested twice and told it was a P & O requirement. Have they now changed that policy ? Time will tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dermotsgirl Posted January 8, 2022 #343 Share Posted January 8, 2022 3 minutes ago, bobstheboy said: Just asked the question re routine testing on another site, person who was on Christmas cruise, Iona, which visited Canary Isles, said the passengers were all tested twice and told it was a P & O requirement. Have they now changed that policy ? Time will tell. If I were to go on a cruise at the moment, I would go with the mindset that testing could be required at any time - 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tring Posted January 8, 2022 #344 Share Posted January 8, 2022 (edited) 26 minutes ago, bobstheboy said: Just asked the question re routine testing on another site, person who was on Christmas cruise, Iona, which visited Canary Isles, said the passengers were all tested twice and told it was a P & O requirement. Have they now changed that policy ? Time will tell. Sounds an excellent idea to test everyone at times as it stops any infection spreading and will greatly reduce the number of contacts who need to isolate. I would be concerned if extra testing was not done fairly regularly at present. I would not expect to be charged for a test if it is a cruise line requirement. Fred have been doing mid cruise tests on their two week cruises, but no cost to passengers. Edited January 8, 2022 by tring 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purplesea Posted January 8, 2022 #345 Share Posted January 8, 2022 We're due to sail next Saturday and our first port of call is Maderia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tring Posted January 8, 2022 #346 Share Posted January 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, purplesea said: We're due to sail next Saturday and our first port of call is Maderia. I thought Portugal always required a test before cruise visits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Anarchy Posted January 8, 2022 #347 Share Posted January 8, 2022 17 minutes ago, Dermotsgirl said: If I were to go on a cruise at the moment, I would go with the mindset that testing could be required at any time - 2 minutes ago, tring said: Sounds an excellent idea to test everyone at times as it stops any infection spreading and will greatly reduce the number of contacts who need to isolate. I would be concerned if extra testing was not done fairly regularly at present. Taking into consideration that our next cruise goes in less than five weeks and is a 35 night TA, I would be surprised if there wasn't extra testing irrespective of what the ports of call stipulate. Especially after ports of call. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gettingwarmer Posted January 8, 2022 Author #348 Share Posted January 8, 2022 1 hour ago, tring said: I thought Portugal always required a test before cruise visits. Only if going ashore. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristaltips Posted January 12, 2022 #349 Share Posted January 12, 2022 It seem that the protocol for offloading of passengers at foreign ports has changed again. The P&O seem to backing off and putting the onus solely on the passengers insurance company. They will fund a phone call to the said insurance company! This is from the FAQ today 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare Interestedcruisefan Posted January 12, 2022 #350 Share Posted January 12, 2022 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Cristaltips said: It seem that the protocol for offloading of passengers at foreign ports has changed again. The P&O seem to backing off and putting the onus solely on the passengers insurance company. They will fund a phone call to the said insurance company! This is from the FAQ today Don't think thats backing off or anything new Think thats cruise line speak to try and let customers know quarantine abroad is the insurance companies remit/problem and nothing to do with P and O And if you don't have enough insurance it's a passenger problem and not a P and O problem We already know negative cases for close contacts aren't covered by insurance In which case P and O passengers won't have "adequate insurance" in P and O's words But thats not to be P and Os problem That becomes,a problem for the passenger and the insurance company It is what it is Not good Edited January 12, 2022 by Interestedcruisefan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts