Jump to content

Alaska back on


Eli_6
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, BlerkOne said:

Which Feds are you referring to? The Carnival brands will be requiring vaccines and I don't see them objecting to much else.

CDC, and EPA appear to have a bias against cruising.. Again I hope cruising resumes soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, eroller said:

The President of Carnival Cruise Line made a big deal about proclaiming CCL would not require vaccinations because no other industry requires them, and Carnival carries so many children.  Looks like she is eating those words with these Alaska cruises.  Honestly I don't think any of the lines know what is up or down right now.  It's not entirely their fault of course because much is out of their control, but they may want to refrain from making broad statements that they will regret later.  They end up losing credibility.  

I'm guessing that Alaska cruises carry very few families, especially since they are much more expensive. Probably mostly couples. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ontheweb said:

Yes, another passed by unanimous consent.

 

When was the last time that happened? I don't even think that there would be 100% consensus that the moon landing was real!!

 

Tom

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think backpedaling is needed.

 

Carnival isn't requiring the vaccine, the ports are.  They will do what the ports require, just as they've always done.

 

But we're just back to waiting on the CDC 

Edited by Sinbadssailors
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, eroller said:

The President of Carnival Cruise Line made a big deal about proclaiming CCL would not require vaccinations because no other industry requires them, and Carnival carries so many children.  Looks like she is eating those words with these Alaska cruises.  Honestly I don't think any of the lines know what is up or down right now.  It's not entirely their fault of course because much is out of their control, but they may want to refrain from making broad statements that they will regret later.  They end up losing credibility.  

That's not correct. They have not said they would not require vaccines. They have have said hopefully not and they shouldn't be required to.

Edited by regoodwinjr
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, regoodwinjr said:

That's not correct. They have not said they would not require vaccines. They have have said hopefully not and they shouldn't be required to.


Certainly reads rather definitive to me.  
 

https://www.seatrade-cruise.com/environmental-health/duffy-indicates-no-plan-vaccine-mandate-carnival-cruise-line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, eroller said:

 

Not a correct interpretation in my view.  What Ms. Duffy actually said was that CCL was continuing to negotiate and thought it unfair that cruising had been singled out as an industry.  Of course they don't want a vaccine mandate (or alternatively, crippling restrictions) when no other industry has one. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, eroller said:

That was days ago, before the Alaska bill passed. But the ticket contract is clear - the protocols change and it is the customer's responsibility to check.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, lizord said:

I wonder what Princess and Hollands plans are for guests already booked who can't or won't get the vaccine. I don't think any cruiseline has gotten "permission" from the CDC to sail out of the US.

Simple: their reservation will be canceled without penalty if they do not fulfill the requirements to sail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BlerkOne said:

That was days ago, before the Alaska bill passed. But the ticket contract is clear - the protocols change and it is the customer's responsibility to check.

The vaccination requirements for Alaskan cruises were probably negotiated prior to Carnival announcing the redeployment of the Miracle.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, regoodwinjr said:

The vaccination requirements for Alaskan cruises were probably negotiated prior to Carnival announcing the redeployment of the Miracle.

I think likely to avoid having to do test cruises in Alaska. The season will be short enough without having to do non-rev cruises. It might also allow Canada a way to allow some cruise stops, if they want some cruise bucks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Purvis1231 said:

Many so called environmentalist believe cruise ships are ruining the oceans.

They are, but they are far outnumbered by commercial ships. At least Carnival got rid of a number of older ships and are now building LNG ships 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Purvis1231 said:

Many so called environmentalist believe cruise ships are ruining the oceans.

 

27 minutes ago, BlerkOne said:

They are, but they are far outnumbered by commercial ships.

The main potential source of ocean pollution from cruise ships is "caused" by the pax they carry: gray/black waters "accidentally" dumped, trash/food waste "accidentally" dumped, etc.

 

Cargo ships have such a small crew their impacts are low in comparison, even if there are so many more cargo ships, plus better implementation of waste controls, apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Lee Cruiser said:

I'm guessing that Alaska cruises carry very few families, especially since they are much more expensive. Probably mostly couples. 

I was planning on booking an Alaskan with kids and husband, but then didn't because of the part about the vax requirement. My husband and I are vaccinated, but my kids are only 7 and 8 so they can't be vaccinated yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back when my husband used to work as a chemical engineer, he would say, "The solution to pollution is dilution."  I really don't think the treated water they release in the gulf of Mexico is hurting anything given its size.  The gulf of Mexico has 643 quadrillion gallons of water and is 12,000 feet deep in places.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ProgRockCruiser said:

 

The main potential source of ocean pollution from cruise ships is "caused" by the pax they carry: gray/black waters "accidentally" dumped, trash/food waste "accidentally" dumped, etc.

 

Cargo ships have such a small crew their impacts are low in comparison, even if there are so many more cargo ships, plus better implementation of waste controls, apparently.

Besides water pollution there is also air pollution, and more. Cargo ships pollute the air more than most countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Eli_6 said:

Back when my husband used to work as a chemical engineer, he would say, "The solution to pollution is dilution."  I really don't think the treated water they release in the gulf of Mexico is hurting anything given its size.  The gulf of Mexico has 643 quadrillion gallons of water and is 12,000 feet deep in places.  

BP did their best to kill it.

 

Treated water is on thing, but dumping untreated or insufficiently treated is another. But water pollution isn't the only concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BlerkOne said:

BP did their best to kill it.

 

Treated water is on thing, but dumping untreated or insufficiently treated is another. But water pollution isn't the only concern.

The Deep Water Horizon incident involved an oil well pumping over 200 million gallons of oil into the gulf non-stop from April to September.  (I practice law in Houston and actually know the attorney who defended BP and did a CLE with him.)  That is not at all comparable to a ship dumping their treated poop water or even someone's plastic straw blowing off the deck.  The Deep Water Horizon situation is considered the worst environmental disaster in US History and substantially bigger than any prior spill anywhere.  Not to mention that 10 or 11 people were killed. There are laws that prevent the cruise ships from dumping untreated water and notably Carnival has paid hefty fines so I suspect at this point they are probably being careful to comply with those laws.  I have lived on the gulf coast for most of my life. I grew up within sight of the water.  I can tell you that unequivocally the water and beaches are substantially cleaner now than they were in the 80s and 90s. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Eli_6 said:

The Deep Water Horizon incident involved an oil well pumping over 200 million gallons of oil into the gulf non-stop from April to September.  (I practice law in Houston and actually know the attorney who defended BP and did a CLE with him.)  That is not at all comparable to a ship dumping their treated poop water or even someone's plastic straw blowing off the deck.  The Deep Water Horizon situation is considered the worst environmental disaster in US History and substantially bigger than any prior spill anywhere.  Not to mention that 10 or 11 people were killed. There are laws that prevent the cruise ships from dumping untreated water and notably Carnival has paid hefty fines so I suspect at this point they are probably being careful to comply with those laws.  I have lived on the gulf coast for most of my life. I grew up within sight of the water.  I can tell you that unequivocally the water and beaches are substantially cleaner now than they were in the 80s and 90s. 

Ships also pollute the air. Light pollution. Sonic pollution. Sun glass pollution. Beaches may be cleaner, sea life may never be the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...

If you are already a Cruise Critic member, please log in with your existing account information or your email address and password.