sandancer Posted July 8, 2015 #1 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Had a big disappointment today when our TA called to say that Celebrity, despite, booking our b2b cruises months ago, have advised them that we cannot board in Seattle, go to Alaska, returning to Vancouver, then go on to Honolulu on the same ship. Evidently Celebrity UK did not flag this up at the time we booked. There is no way round it other than to cancel one of the cruises. Anyone got any ideas how we can deal with this without losing one of our cruises? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4774Papa Posted July 8, 2015 #2 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Repeal the Jones Act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandancer Posted July 8, 2015 Author #3 Share Posted July 8, 2015 I wish. Coming from the UK we are not exact familiar with US Maritime law. I wish I understood why going from one U.S. Port to another is not allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypercafe Posted July 8, 2015 #4 Share Posted July 8, 2015 I wish. Coming from the UK we are not exact familiar with US Maritime law. I wish I understood why going from one U.S. Port to another is not allowed. It's because the ship is not registered and flagged in the US. There are a few laws in play that were put in place to protect the US shipping industry, i believe in the 30's. There are lots of ships doing Alaska, maybe you can take one line to Alaska and then X to Hawaii. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruzzzinma Posted July 8, 2015 #5 Share Posted July 8, 2015 You can book a different ship for the Alaska leg of your trip. Going from one U.S. Port to another is allowed if you don't sail on the same ship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tunaman2011 Posted July 8, 2015 #6 Share Posted July 8, 2015 I wish. Coming from the UK we are not exact familiar with US Maritime law. I wish I understood why going from one U.S. Port to another is not allowed. Greetings It's actually the PVSA (Passenger Vessel Services Act) passed in 1886 that is the problem. And most of us in the USA don't understand why it is still around. It was passed to protect American companies from foreign competition when operating between US ports. You will be on a foreign flagged ship so you run afoul of the law if you sail your desired itinerary. In today's global world the law in out of touch with reality, but it is still on the books and still enforced. Good Sailing Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wine-O Posted July 8, 2015 #7 Share Posted July 8, 2015 There are a lot of Celebrity/RCCL cruises that go to Alaska. See if you can find one that goes from Seattle to Seattle, then transfer to Vancouver to pick up the ship to Hawaii. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandancer Posted July 8, 2015 Author #8 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Thanks everyone for your advice. My TA is investigating alternatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamloops50 Posted July 8, 2015 #9 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Had a big disappointment today when our TA called to say that Celebrity, despite, booking our b2b cruises months ago, have advised them that we cannot board in Seattle, go to Alaska, returning to Vancouver, then go on to Honolulu on the same ship. Evidently Celebrity UK did not flag this up at the time we booked. There is no way round it other than to cancel one of the cruises. Anyone got any ideas how we can deal with this without losing one of our cruises? Thanks There is no way around this combination. These are the only cruise on Celebrity from Seattle that do this. I don't think your TA is going to find solution to this problem. If you continued on to Sydney after Honolulu you be legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upwarduk Posted July 8, 2015 #10 Share Posted July 8, 2015 We fell foul of the same PVSA act when we returned from Hawaii, supposedly to San Diego- we had not visited a distant foreign port. However, everyone had to disembark in Ensenada, Mexico and be bussed to San Diego. The ship arrived in San Diego before we did. We were told it was to give the American workers jobs. Foreign aircraft are not allowed to carry passengers within the USA either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bo1953 Posted July 8, 2015 #11 Share Posted July 8, 2015 We fell foul of the same PVSA act when we returned from Hawaii, supposedly to San Diego- we had not visited a distant foreign port.However, everyone had to disembark in Ensenada, Mexico and be bussed to San Diego. The ship arrived in San Diego before we did. We were told it was to give the American workers jobs. Foreign aircraft are not allowed to carry passengers within the USA either. You got it correct... I had the same issue in the 80's and it took, literally, an act of Congress to permit me to take my ill mother on an Alaska cruise like the OP... and it is very difficult to get Congress to do something like that and some time too... it is a union job protection act along with the Jones Act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fla742 Posted July 8, 2015 #12 Share Posted July 8, 2015 If the ship makes a stop in Vancouver before going to Alaska get permission to board in Vancouver, rather than Seattle. That should satisfy the Jones Act prohibitions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare little britain Posted July 8, 2015 #13 Share Posted July 8, 2015 (edited) Had a big disappointment today when our TA called to say that Celebrity, despite, booking our b2b cruises months ago, have advised them that we cannot board in Seattle, go to Alaska, returning to Vancouver, then go on to Honolulu on the same ship. Evidently Celebrity UK did not flag this up at the time we booked. There is no way round it other than to cancel one of the cruises. Anyone got any ideas how we can deal with this without losing one of our cruises? Thanks Basically you cannot board in one US port and disembark in another US port without visiting a distant land! I'm afraid that Vancouver, albeit in a different country is not 'distant' enough. How about doing an Alaska cruise out of Vancouver, then picking up the cruise to Hawaii from there? I thought that the X booking system flagged up if cruises were contravening this law. Edited July 8, 2015 by little britain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cle-guy Posted July 8, 2015 #14 Share Posted July 8, 2015 If the ship makes a stop in Vancouver before going to Alaska get permission to board in Vancouver, rather than Seattle. That should satisfy the Jones Act prohibitions. The act requires a visit to a "distant foreign port". Vancouver has been determined to not be "distant" and therefore does not qualify. This act is the reason that "cruises to nowhere" have been stopped, as well why there is just a single major cruise line who does cruises around hawaii - that ship is flagged as US and therefore adheres to all US laws, and pay regulations - which makes it a costly ship to run, and why many cruise lines just don't do around Hawaii trips, and why one can't just do West coast to Hawaii and back, have to stop someplace else, like Ensenada Mexico as other posters have noted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAV Posted July 8, 2015 #15 Share Posted July 8, 2015 A few months ago, someone else posted about this exact same issue (see link below). They, too, wanted to sail Solstice Seattle-Vancouver-Honolulu B2B. http://boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=2177353&highlight=pvsa Their "solution" was to instead book RCCL Radiance of the Seas from Anchorage (Seward) to Vancouver, then switch to Solstice Vancouver to Honolulu. Radiance will arrive Vancouver the same day Solstice departs for Honolulu, so no overnight hotel necessary. The fact they are changing ships in Vancouver satisfies the PVSA (Passenger Vessel Services Act) because the language in that law refers only to sailing on the same ship. Changing ships was the key. It's also legal to overnight in Vancouver between sailings, however it's tough (if not impossible) to find one common ship that overnights in Vancouver between sailings. Good luck! ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wine-O Posted July 8, 2015 #16 Share Posted July 8, 2015 The act requires a visit to a "distant foreign port". Vancouver has been determined to not be "distant" and therefore does not qualify. This act is the reason that "cruises to nowhere" have been stopped, as well why there is just a single major cruise line who does cruises around hawaii - that ship is flagged as US and therefore adheres to all US laws, and pay regulations - which makes it a costly ship to run, and why many cruise lines just don't do around Hawaii trips, and why one can't just do West coast to Hawaii and back, have to stop someplace else, like Ensenada Mexico as other posters have noted. Ensenada, Mexico, is not distant, but it qualified as they bussed people to/from from San Diego. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoppyandNana Posted July 8, 2015 #17 Share Posted July 8, 2015 (edited) The act requires a visit to a "distant foreign port". Vancouver has been determined to not be "distant" and therefore does not qualify. This act is the reason that "cruises to nowhere" have been stopped, as well why there is just a single major cruise line who does cruises around hawaii - that ship is flagged as US and therefore adheres to all US laws, and pay regulations - which makes it a costly ship to run, and why many cruise lines just don't do around Hawaii trips, and why one can't just do West coast to Hawaii and back, have to stop someplace else, like Ensenada Mexico as other posters have noted. FYI The Jones Act (also known as the Passenger Services Act) prohibits ships of Non-U.S registry from embarking and debarking guests at two different U.S ports. Such travel would constitute point-to-point transportation between two U.S ports, which is prohibited on foreign flagged ships. Note: Puerto Rico and the U.S Virgin Islands (St. Thomas; St. Croix; St. John) are not in the category of U.S ports under this act. The exception to this rule is if the itinerary includes a "distant foreign port". South America and the ABC Islands (Aruba-Bonaire-Curacao) do qualify as distant foreign ports. Canada, Mexico, Central America, Bermuda and most Caribbean Islands do not qualify as distant foreign ports. Any guest who insists on embarking (due to unforeseen circumstances outside the guest’s control, for missing the ship) or debarking (for emergency reasons), which violates the Jones Act, will accept responsibility for any resulting penalties ($300 per person). Important Note: Guests cannot pre-plan or purposely embark or debark a ship in a U.S port that will violate the Jones Act Edited July 8, 2015 by PoppyandNana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAV Posted July 8, 2015 #18 Share Posted July 8, 2015 (edited) ................... Edited July 8, 2015 by BEAV post no longer applicable since PoppyandNana changed/edited their post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barwick Cruiser Posted July 8, 2015 #19 Share Posted July 8, 2015 We almost made the same mistake after we booked the Solstice this September for the final cruise to Alaska, departing Seattle and disembarking in Vancouver...we also wanted to stay on the ship to Hawaii and then fly back home from there. Sounds like that is what the OP wants to do. The only alternative we learned about to be able to keep both itineraries on the Solstice was to disembark in Victoria, stay overnight, take the ferry to Vancouver, missing Nanaimo port and then reboard in Vancouver for the Hawaii leg. We figured it was too much hassle but maybe that would work for the OP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare Cruise Junky Posted July 8, 2015 #20 Share Posted July 8, 2015 If the ship makes a stop in Vancouver before going to Alaska get permission to board in Vancouver, rather than Seattle. That should satisfy the Jones Act prohibitions. It doesn't unfortunately for the OP there is no way around this. Boarding in Vancouver would have been a solution. They'll need to find another ship for one of the itineraries. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordoncruickshank Posted July 8, 2015 #21 Share Posted July 8, 2015 FYI The Jones Act (also known as the Passenger Services Act) prohibits ships of Non-U.S registry from embarking and debarking guests at two different U.S ports. Such travel would constitute point-to-point transportation between two U.S ports, which is prohibited on foreign flagged ships. Note: Puerto Rico and the U.S Virgin Islands (St. Thomas; St. Croix; St. John) are not in the category of U.S ports under this act. The exception to this rule is if the itinerary includes a "distant foreign port". South America and the ABC Islands (Aruba-Bonaire-Curacao) do qualify as distant foreign ports. Canada, Mexico, Central America, Bermuda and most Caribbean Islands do not qualify as distant foreign ports. I presume that is why our Panama Canal cruise a number of years ago from San Francisco to FL stopped in Columbia and Aruba. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAV Posted July 8, 2015 #22 Share Posted July 8, 2015 I presume that is why our Panama Canal cruise a number of years ago from San Francisco to FL stopped in Columbia and Aruba. Correct. Those two ports are designated as "distant foreign" and qualify (make legal) the voyage between SF and Florida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoncom Posted July 8, 2015 #23 Share Posted July 8, 2015 (edited) Had same problem 2 yrs ago. I kept the Solstice repo to HA. Only Alaska leg that fit was NCL Sun. Really a marginal ship. Find another Line if thats among choices. PVSA will never be cancelled. Edited July 8, 2015 by zoncom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeaBag Posted July 8, 2015 #24 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Sorry for your troubles Sandancer. Were you on the Solstice Honolulu - Vancouver 2014? Here is the Vancouver port schedule for Sept http://www.portmetrovancouver.com/en/about/cruiseandtourism/cruiselineschedules.aspx As far as I can see a solution would be to sail on the Oosterdam (Holland America) Sept 13 - 20, Vancouver return, spend 2 nights in our lovely city and then board the Solstice. Incidentally we're looking at the Solstice too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasset Posted July 8, 2015 #25 Share Posted July 8, 2015 OK I will probably get a nerd alert but the Jones Act and the Passenger Vessel Services Act are different laws. The Jones Act regulates cargo ships. PVSA regulates, as the title says, passenger ships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now